Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-09-2012, 11:56 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 491
Thanks: 17
Thanked 41 Times in 31 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
I would really appreciate some real numbers from the real world from real members on this site.

For instance, vehicle weight, vehicle size, mileage with AC and without, and city or highway driving.
Thank you much.
On my vehicle the fuel difference is about 0.5 ltr / 100 klm for air on and off.

Steady highway running is around 7.2 and with the air on it is around 7.7 l / 100 klms. (US mpg: from 7.2 (32.6) to 7.7 (30.5) so about 2 mpg) at around 90 kph (US 55 mph) which is just under the legal max of 100 kph (62 mph)

The car is a GM variant (Holden 2003 Acclaim sedan) with the 3.8 engine and the 4L60E trans. Weight is around 1600 kgs (3200 lbs US approx).

Peter.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 12:04 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 1,362

The Q - '02 Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 331
Thanked 183 Times in 127 Posts
I would really appreciate members posting there vehicles under their avitar.......

just sayin.....
__________________
ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First, Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Second, Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

third, rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip! http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 01:08 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 590

Ladogaboy - '011 Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.18 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '011 Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 57 Times in 46 Posts
I almost never run my A/C anymore, but when I did, I only noticed about a 2-3 mpg (10%) decrease.

At this point, I've mostly weened myself off of using the A/C. We've had a pretty mild year, and in addition, my car is white and most often parked in the shade. I'm thinking I might get a UV reflective tint at some point, but I haven't really needed it yet.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 01:30 AM   #14 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Should I drop a note to the lab telling them they are full of crap?

I don't use a/c enough to get any data.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 04:28 AM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 134

The Truck - '02 GU Patrol ST
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Just did a big trip, about 3,000km, air con on all the time, 30-36C outside, virtually no change in the FE.
I think this is an issue that shows up more with smaller vehicles, mine is a big diesel 4x4, smaller vehicles still have the same needs for auxillary load, whether it be alternator, aircon etc., but as a percentage on the fuel economy it is much bigger on smaller vehicles than on a larger vehicle.
I could delete all my auxillaries and not see much change, but if I keep the weight down and streamline the box, I can get major improvements.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 08:20 AM   #16 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
...I've "measured" drops in MPG ranging from 10% to 14% on my Vibe with A/C, but back-to-back A-B-A testing was NOT exactly 100% "repeatable"...LOT's of variation.

...hence, I 'rule-of-thumb' A/C at 10%-15% for my car...others will obviously get different values, but probably close.
__________________
• 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
• 2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
• 2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
• 2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

• 1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
• 1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
• 1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
• 1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
• 1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2012, 06:01 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,956

Hδgar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Should I drop a note to the lab telling them they are full of crap?
Nah, it's just that the cycle during which they measure these differences, isn't representative of normal everyday driving.


The problem I have to filter out the AC use, is than I mostly use it under conditions that don't make up most of my normal driving.
When the AC is on, I'm usually also carrying passengers - and when carrying passengers, I'm usually also driving faster, both of which affect FC.
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2012, 10:10 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 491
Thanks: 17
Thanked 41 Times in 31 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesla View Post
I think this is an issue that shows up more with smaller vehicles... smaller vehicles still have the same needs for auxillary load, whether it be alternator, aircon etc., but as a percentage on the fuel economy it is much bigger on smaller vehicles than on a larger vehicle.
Tesla,
Thats is my thinking as well.

I remember my brother's Nissan Micra had aircon and you could have cool air or more performance...but not both at the same time.

Interestingly he traded to 4.0 litre Falcon and gets about the same economy.

I suspect he doesn't have to drive the Falcon nearly as hard.

Peter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2012, 02:00 AM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 178
Thanks: 16
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
For really small four-pots and three-pots I've had and tested, it seems to be about a 10-15% penalty in traffic, depending on how weak the engine was and how big the compressor was.

We did this on the dyno (a hell of a long time ago) and got about a 10-15 horsepower drop on a standard 1.6 liter engine at idle... which just happened to have 400 horsepower and a turbocharger, but it's the same for most small engines... and the turbo didn't make boost at idle.

Worst I had was a compressor conversion when the Calsonic compressor clutch on my Nissan went kaput for the fourth time. Stuck a bigger compressor with an indestructible rubber clutch on it, instead... on there and you could feel about 25 to 30 ponies go south every time it turned on.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com