Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2011, 07:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: northeast Illinois
Posts: 218

sc1 - '98 sc1
90 day: 46.37 mpg (US)

Tour bike - '011 Carp line Tour
Thanks: 1
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
cam timing

I am sure this topic has been hashed around, but for a single cam engine:

Which would get better mpg, advancing cam timing or retarding cam timing.

Advancing cam timing will make the engine have the lowest brake specific fuel consumption at a lower rpm, so one can drive in a higher gear.

Retarding the cam timing will cause some of the mixture to be pushed back into the intake manifold, thus lowering the pumping losses. The exhaust valve opens later, thus providing some extra force on the piston.

It seems to me that for lugging around town, an advanced setting would be better and for highway a retarded setting would be better.

Anyone have experience?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 06:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have an 09 Denali. I have been playing with the tune. I can tell you that with my L92 VVT motor (cam advance and retard) at cruise, the cam is retarded. I get right at 19mpg highway which is pretty good for a 5600+lb box that is AWD and has over 400hp. Of course I am on eco modder looking for more.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com