Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-11-2011, 09:10 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Alien Observer
 
suspectnumber961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I flitter here and there
Posts: 270

highcountryexplorer - '86 720 KC 4x4 ST with fiberglass cap
90 day: 20.51 mpg (US)

Elroy - '03 Focus ZX3 w/Zetec DOHC engine
90 day: 33.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
Car Aerodynamics Have Stalled?

Browser Warning

"Pundits were suggesting that in the near future there would be plenty of cars with 0.25 and lower drag numbers. It seemed like a win/win change: since at speed by far the majority of power is used to push air out of the way, slipping more easily through that air results in more power available for acceleration and less overall fuel usage. And what with the huge investment in wind tunnels, the experience that aeronautical engineering could bring, and a new crop of stylists schooled in aerodynamics, well, it was all going to happen.

Except, it hasn’t."


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Carry on humans...we are extremely proud of you. ..................

Warning: There are unicorns about...DO NOT throw anything unusual into their enclosure...they might stomp it and also you if you are not quick enough.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to suspectnumber961 For This Useful Post:
autogyro (09-11-2011)
Old 09-11-2011, 09:13 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 3,940

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.22 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 30.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 501 Times in 306 Posts
We'll see about that! ;-)
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 10:03 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / SC
Posts: 658

1 Ton - '94 C3500
90 day: 19.7 mpg (US)

Big White Brick - '03 Express Van
90 day: 15.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 70
Thanked 42 Times in 39 Posts
There was a recent thread here about how car manufactuers used to post their cd #s.
Now it seems they stopped caring.
__________________
Support Bennelson !

I can't understand why my MPG's are so low..........
16000lb, 41' Toy Haulers are rough on FE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 10:54 AM   #4 (permalink)
Tenderfoot
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bozeman Montana
Posts: 437

MagMetalCivic - '04 Civic EX
90 day: 37.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 127
Thanked 169 Times in 88 Posts
This article you link to is from 2006. Having just returned from Europe, I can assure you aerodynamics are very much a concern there, many cars have slippery shapes. Here in the States, I think changes are not far behind.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 12:06 PM   #5 (permalink)
Schwinning!
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 990

The Anal Probe - '92 Probe GL
Team Ford
90 day: 35.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 310
Thanked 237 Times in 133 Posts
I'm a senior in Transportation Design at CCS in Detroit. Let me tell you in the past three years I have not heard but a few sentences about aerodynamics from any of the instructors' mouths. It's just not on America's radar. I imagine a lot of the reason for posting Cd numbers with prototypes was that gas was expensive back then. Nowadays with the neo horsepower race we as a country really don't care. We just want cars that look flashy. It's sad but true.

Edit: Let me add that it'll be at least an eight year wait if we start teaching students about aero this year. It'll take them four years to complete school and four years for the company to design and engineer the car.

That is, unless the current designers start doing aero. Then it could be 3-5 years.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Spotter View Post
Nothing fell off so that is good.

Last edited by Sven7; 09-11-2011 at 12:22 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 12:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern CT, USA
Posts: 1,074

Lean Burn Civic - '97 Civic HX
Team Honda
90 day: 51.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 87 Times in 63 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonG View Post
There was a recent thread here about how car manufactuers used to post their cd #s.
Now it seems they stopped caring.
I think the manufacturers - and more importantly the ad and TV commercial writers - don't think the buying public cares or understands. In fact most writers likely don't understand or care; they mostly were literature/arts/communications students.

But, as ChazInMT wrote, designers outside the US certainly seem to be moving in the direction of better aero. Some of their stuff eventually makes it over here.

Plus, as soon as I get my planned aero rear spoiler built, and a big sign on the car "50 mpg", EVERYONE will want one! Right now I have a "48 mpg" sign on the driver's side rear window, and I've been asked how I do it by total strangers.
__________________
Check your tire pressure - keep it up !!

We've learned that diet has a closer relationship to cancer than we ever thought. Please see this Wikipedia article on The China Study.

Driving Lean Burn '97 Civic HX, lotsa mods by now! '89 Volvo 240 is semi-retired. I did love that car though!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 02:24 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 65
Thanks: 15
Thanked 22 Times in 10 Posts
I found this to be the most compelling pice of data in the link:

http://autospeed.com/cms/gallery/art...w=0&a=2455&i=7

33% of the total drag (based on a soon to be produced Volvo) is produced by the cooling system. That's 2% more than the total exterior!

Of course this isn't a problem (pointed out to me in rebuke by an illustrious member of this forum), since this was completely solved by Korff a half century ago.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 02:37 PM   #8 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
"...the pundits have punted!.."
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 02:46 PM   #9 (permalink)
Schwinning!
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stillwater, MN
Posts: 990

The Anal Probe - '92 Probe GL
Team Ford
90 day: 35.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 310
Thanked 237 Times in 133 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by autogyro View Post
I found this to be the most compelling pice of data in the link:

http://autospeed.com/cms/gallery/art...w=0&a=2455&i=7

33% of the total drag (based on a soon to be produced Volvo) is produced by the cooling system. That's 2% more than the total exterior!

Of course this isn't a problem (pointed out to me in rebuke by an illustrious member of this forum), since this was completely solved by Korff a half century ago.
Perhaps it's time for variable grille slats that close when not needed, as seen on this Stutz.


Stutz by Tyler Linner [Ft. Corporate Insect Masters], on Flickr
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Spotter View Post
Nothing fell off so that is good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 03:43 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,101

The Red Baron - '00 F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 37 Posts
There are some realities that intrude on aero design.

The human body has a finite number of positions you can bend it into and expect it to tolerate.

Mechanical components need space and only come in a limited number of arrangements.

Auto fashion is for ridiculously large-diameter wheels set at the corners.

Unibody design imposes its own set of limitations.

You probably have hit the limits.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Hard Tonneau and Rugged Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com