Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-07-2009, 09:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
My Goal: 35 MPG
 
RandomFact314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 395

HAPPY - '00 Neon
90 day: 27.72 mpg (US)

G/F's Car - Kyan - '01 Rio
90 day: 25.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Car loosing weight

Do you think a car can be too light weight? A crx stripped is like 1900 pounds and you can get carbon fiber hoods, hatches, fenders, rims, and tons of other stuff. Is there ever a point where you think your car is just too light to get on the highway safely? *not that I ever expect to spend all that money on c/f for a crx )


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 10:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Relevance is irrelevant!
 
bluetwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 121

Civic EX - '00 Civic EX
Thanks: 9
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to bluetwo
Too light?.... I think the only potential danger is in having less protection, not that a CRX came with that much to start with. There's certainly very little danger of the car taking flight even at the highest speeds. Lol....
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 10:45 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 493

Jeep Offspring - '97 MPV Allsport 2wd
90 day: 19.05 mpg (US)

Geeeoooh - '93 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 46.86 mpg (US)

Truckwez - '04 Dakota SLT
Thanks: 7
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Short answer, no.

Last edited by MadisonMPG; 08-07-2009 at 10:52 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 11:36 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 4,428

Cara's Work Log - '00 Caravan
90 day: 28.21 mpg (US)

Cara - '00 Caravan Base
90 day: 29.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 70 Times in 63 Posts
Yeah, it can be too light if you don't do something about the power/weight ratio.

You don't want a 1400 lb CRX (It's been done) with 200 HP on the street (The obvious B-swaps only have 160 at most, stock... H's go into the 200's easily, K's start higher.)

I'd honestly be wary of anything that light with even a 10:1 PWR. (That's 140HP and 1400 lbs.) The lighter the car is, the less grip (comparatively) the tires have, all else equal. That's not saying that the car has to be heavy to drive well, because we all know that's not true, but you have to re-learn how to drive within your means if you go too light. With my 4th Gen down to ~1700 and with 130 HP at the crank, it was kinda squirrely at times, not wanting to keep traction with high-RPM downshifts. Brake bias became an issue as well, as the car became lighter. The rears wanted to lock up under hard braking.

Frankly, the car was actually faster before I pulled all the weight, or started making more torque. It had enough torque to keep the tires spinning through 2nd gear, and high RPM 2nd gear pulls out of corners would inevitably understeer like crazy, whereas with the stock engine, I could walk the throttle through all but the tightest turns, and never lose traction.

It became a large issue of balance when I started losing serious weight and getting more power. Hitting the gas too hard put the front end straight, and hitting the brakes too hard brought the rear end around... couldn't win.
__________________


"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
Because bean counters always win, that's why.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2009, 11:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Ol' Skooler
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 64

Trailer Queen - '67 Mustang
90 day: 16.52 mpg (US)

Nightie - '09 XL1200N Nightster
90 day: 44.75 mpg (US)

Nightie + Mustang - '67 Combined FE index
90 day: 22.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I don't think so. When I get around to building my Model T hot rod, we're talking probably a 1000lb car stripped down (curb weight was ~1200lbs with the 20hp 177" 'Banger), and that's with a heavy cast iron motor out front, and they don't seem to have any trouble staying on the road even with stupid amounts of HP being sent to the back wheels.
__________________
'67 Mustang - Real cars aren't made out of plastic and computers.
'09 Harley Nightster

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 12:29 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 2,363

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 17.21 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 75 Times in 59 Posts
My cars are all loosssing weight. It's called the Rust Belt.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2009, 01:02 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
McTimson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 258

The Turkel - '93 Tercel
Team Toyota
90 day: 45.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
There's not much to worry about as far as stability and staying on the road, but structural integrity and safety come into play when you start removing too much stuff from the car. But if you're only removing or replacing the 'visual' things, then there's not much to worry about.

When you start drilling holes in the frame of the car trying to save weight, then you might need to worry.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2009, 01:11 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: French Louisiana
Posts: 123

Yaris - '07 Yaris Liftback
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
*loose = to unbind
*lose = to own something and then fail to keep its possession

Sure. A car that the wind could blow into the air would be too light.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2009, 01:28 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 2,363

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 17.21 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 75 Times in 59 Posts
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2009, 02:43 AM   #10 (permalink)
My Goal: 35 MPG
 
RandomFact314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 395

HAPPY - '00 Neon
90 day: 27.72 mpg (US)

G/F's Car - Kyan - '01 Rio
90 day: 25.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
....
Lol frank lee, I have never seen that video before, funny
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Tags
carbon fiber, crx, honda, pounds, weight

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electric car conversion: Project ForkenSwift MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 857 11-16-2009 01:33 PM
EcoModding for Beginners: Getting great gas mileage. SVOboy EcoModding Central 52 07-20-2009 11:26 PM
Magazine: Green Car Journal cfg83 General Efficiency Discussion 4 03-02-2009 12:14 AM
Win $100.00 in Free Gas! Design Contest: Ecomod my Ride XFi EcoModding Central 114 09-09-2008 03:41 AM
CRX vtec weight reduction !? chipX EcoModding Central 24 09-05-2008 09:17 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com