Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-30-2017, 05:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 60
Thanks: 31
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Clean vs Dirty car aero

I have heard that a dirty car gets better mileage than a clean car because the dirt creates a rough surface, kind of like a golf ball. But Mythbusters tested that and found thhat a dirty car reduces mileage, but then again they sprayed a half inch thick mud coating on it, which is not at all indicative of a "normal" dirty car, unless you go offroading lol. What do you think, and how big could the difference actually be? Thanks

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EcoCivic For This Useful Post:
aerohead (08-05-2017)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-30-2017, 05:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Stubby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 758

Topoff (RIP) - '92 Geo Metro LSi
90 day: 48.54 mpg (US)

'91 Miata - '91 Mazda Miata
90 day: 27.11 mpg (US)

'86 Fiero GT - '86 Pontiac Fiero GT

Purple Penny Pincher - '95 Pontiac Firefly Base
90 day: 43.68 mpg (US)

Jett-Black - '01 Volkswagen Jetta
90 day: 39.32 mpg (US)

Firefly EV - '98 Pontiac Firefly EV
90 day: 107.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 228 Times in 167 Posts
You'll get a lot of suppositions with a question like that...but hopefully someone comes along with some hard evidence one way or the other.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2017, 06:15 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 34
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
I'd guess any aero gains are offset by losses caused by extra weight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2017, 07:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,823

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 856
Thanked 475 Times in 357 Posts
Consider safety instead. Bright & shiny seen better by others.

Glass so clean in & out that new cars look bad.

Vision by others::Vision by driver.
__________________
2004.0 DODGE Ram QC/LB 2500 2WD/NV-5600 305/555 ISB. 7,940-lb. Stock. 200,000 miles/5000-hrs @ 40-mph average.
1990 35' Silver Streak TT 7,900-lb.
8-cpm solo & 11-cpm towing; 21-mpg average past 54k-miles
Sold: 1983 Silver Streak 3411
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2017, 10:11 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 60
Thanks: 31
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jez77 View Post
I'd guess any aero gains are offset by losses caused by extra weight.
I don't think that the dirt weighs that much lol. But then again the difference in aerodynamics would not be much either.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2017, 10:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
me and my metro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 262

Economy Saturn - '02 Saturn L200
Thanks: 85
Thanked 69 Times in 53 Posts
I don't know, I removed a couple hundred pounds of dirt from my company's backhoe yesterday just so I could service it. LOL
__________________
02 Saturn L200 5 speed
84 Gmc 6.5 na diesel K30 4x4
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2017, 11:52 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 34
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
A few years ago one of the world rally championship cars had the dirt they cleaned off it after 1 dirt stage weighed. It came in at 23ish kg if I remember right.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 02:33 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gumby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Butte, Montana
Posts: 530

little jona - '91 Dodge D 250 first gen cummins LE
Team Streamliner
Last 3: 24.65 mpg (US)

Little Jona airo modded - '91 Dodge RAM 3/4 TON D 250 24 AUTO
Pickups
Team Cummins
90 day: 22.62 mpg (US)

The Salted Hound Jenny. - '87 Dodge Ram 50/D-50 5sp 4X4
Thanks: 159
Thanked 262 Times in 178 Posts
Depending on the part of the world/ country you are in ,not washing the road grime off is a shure way to get rust started and that will cut your mileage and safety.
__________________
1st gen cummins 91.5 dodge d250 ,16cm turbo housing ehxsost manafulld wrap, Aero Tonto
best tank: distance 649gps mi 24.04 mpg 27.011usg
Best mpg : 29.3mpg 97mi 3.311usg 7/27/16


Former
'83 GMC S-15 Jimmy 2door 2wd O/D auto 3.73R&P
'79 Chevy K20 4X4 350ci 400hp msd custom th400 /np205. 7.5-new 14mpg modded befor modding was a thing
87' Hyundai Excel
83 ranger w/87 2.9 L FI2wd auto 18mpg on the floor
04 Mitsubishi Gallant 2.4L auto 26mpg
06 Subaru Forrester XT(WRX PACKAGE) MT AWD Turbocharged 18 plying dirty best of 26mpg@70mph
95Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 14-18mpg
04 Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 16-22mpg


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 12:19 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 9,082
Thanks: 1,969
Thanked 2,951 Times in 2,308 Posts
Authoritative enough?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
surface friction drag
Skin friction drag on a car is associated with air viscosity and local pressure.The car could be made of glass and have no lower drag than if painted with flat,camo paint.The only way you can reduce this friction drag is to not drive the car.
Permalink #26 in Clean vs Dirty Car / Much difference? in 2015.07
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2017, 01:35 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 8,378
Thanks: 10,314
Thanked 4,406 Times in 2,447 Posts
clean vs dirty

Quote:
Originally Posted by EcoCivic View Post
I have heard that a dirty car gets better mileage than a clean car because the dirt creates a rough surface, kind of like a golf ball. But Mythbusters tested that and found thhat a dirty car reduces mileage, but then again they sprayed a half inch thick mud coating on it, which is not at all indicative of a "normal" dirty car, unless you go offroading lol. What do you think, and how big could the difference actually be? Thanks
Aeronautical engineer and creator of the Litestar/Pulse,100-mpg vehicle of the early 1980s claimed Cd 0.18 'clean' ,and Cd 0.20 'dirty'.
It suggests that the vehicle had a laminar body.
Sighard Hoerner,who was with Messerschmitt in WW-II,claimed that the rough,olive drag,flat-primer-like paint on their fighter aircraft made no difference to performance.
Rough,clay,full-scale wind tunnel models appear to generate the same Cd as a production,OEM,lustrous paint-finished model of the same car.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (08-10-2017)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com