The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists

[NeilBlanchard]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

If it were real they wouldn't be working so hard, organizing and conspiring to fake it.

That's a mighty nice self-confirming conspiracy theory you have there ...

[oil pan 4]

Not a conspiracy theory at all.
Climate gate 1, 2 and 3.
The only thing they have proven is how much they are willing to lie to make it look like man made climate change is happening.

Only some one who can't come up with a good excuse would try to call it a conspiracy theory and sweep it under the rug and pretend like it isn't happening.
Sorry something you believe in is a lie.

[freebeard]

Climategate[n] was a drum-beat to rally support for a Global Carbon Tax[ing Authority].

Now that someone has pointed at the Paris Accords lack of clothes, everyone can see it. The drums should die down.

[Frank Lee]

https://newatlas.com/ozone-hole-reco...9e053-90350850

Human activity can and does **** up the environment. AND when there is global consensus, human activity can fix it. Harder to fix when there are dumb*** deniers throwing wrenches in the gears.

[redpoint5]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

I time traveled back to 2007 for about an hour (I searched and read some old forum posts).
Remember how I said man made global warming is mass hysteria, a few pages back.
Go back and poke around circa 2007 to 2010

Any threads in particular you can link to? I'd be interested to see the conversation then compared to now. I wasn't a member that far back.

I will point out that the hysteria is based on 50-100 year time-frames, and not a decade. The inconvenient part is that most of us won't be around when doomsday arrives. Maybe that's the convenient part?

It does seem absurd to think humanity will not have adjusted to whatever environmental conditions gradually take shape over the next 4 generations. If seas rise a couple mm per year, I can plan accordingly.

[oil pan 4]

It's impossible to fix something after beening caught 3 times falsifying the data that supports the cause.
Because if they had to falsify data, then obviously they never had anything to begin with.

I like how the "deniers" get blamed for the man made global warming movement self destrucing.
How did the deniers cause the believes to get caught falsifying temperature data 3 different times at the organizational level?

That's the kind of insanity I'm talking about.

[redneck]

.



>

[Frank Lee]

Soooooo... Obama funded a global consensus. And it was only studied from 2009-2016. I see.

Did you know congress allocates funding? The mainly CON congress Obama had?

"Liberty Alliance"- LMAO. Should I be getting my scientific data from Bartfart and Faux?

[Xist]

I do not remember anyone denying the hole in the ozone layer or anyone getting caught falsifying data.

[redneck]

.

"Liberty Alliance"- LMAO. Should I be getting my scientific data from Bartfart and Faux?

Maybe...


Report: 485 Scientific Papers Published In 2017 Undermine Supposed


Someone has to put out information regarding these inconsistencies to the public.



The alarmists won't...






>