Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2017, 06:29 PM   #11 (permalink)
ScanGauge <3
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: CID
Posts: 289

Winter Sacrifice - '96 Subaru Outback
Subaru
90 day: 25.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 153
Thanked 92 Times in 66 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by luckyfool View Post
I am considering installing cold air intake on my 2007 Honda Civic LX for my first mod. I am planning to order the K&N cold air intake kit that I saw on 4wheelonline. Is it a proven way to improve a vehicle's fuel consumption and horsepower?
It can certainly help increase the car's fuel consumption, yes.

__________________



Best tank (so far): 32 MPG
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-06-2017, 06:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,134

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 49.6 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 32.81 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 34.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 243
Thanked 262 Times in 197 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by stovie View Post
I did, but like I said I live in a mountainous region and the lack of power caused it to loose mpg will the cold air increased my mpg due to not having to downshift from fifth anymore!!
I think at altitude it's not so much the temperature but the density of the air. You don't want to do anything that reduces the density of the already thinner air.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2017, 09:04 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,923

Gaptooth - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 69.77 mpg (US)

Work Van - '16 Chevy Express 2500
90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 600
Thanked 687 Times in 438 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
I think at altitude it's not so much the temperature but the density of the air. You don't want to do anything that reduces the density of the already thinner air.
Except when you do.

Warmer air = thinner air = wider throttle plate, which is good in every situation except where the throttle is wide open and you need to downshift for a bit more power. At part throttle loads, colder and denser air will cause economy to drop. Warmer air also (generally) helps with combustion efficiency.

Fun bit, I seem to remember some of the old Honda CRX's having a factory flap which fed the engine warm air under light loads, and colder air as the throttle opened up. This gave the best of both worlds - economy when you need it, and power when you nee it.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com