Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-17-2012, 11:27 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: hesperia
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i have thought of the tdi cars, but being a mechanic i wouldn't want to own one. The engine will last forever, everything around it will fall apart.
i plan on redoing the interior some to make the car a much nicer ride for sure, the rest of the car i know can handle the drive. a first gen has crossed my mind.

the top chop would focus mainly on the back of the car, i want to drop the deck lid about 3 inches, almost the height of the rear tail lights. it would essentially be the same as adding a boat tail as there would be less area behind the car. i wish i could use photoshop better i could show you


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 01:29 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 2,878

honda cb125 - '74 CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Civic VX
Thanks: 390
Thanked 222 Times in 191 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3gd16 View Post
If you want to go and destroke to a 1.3 liter engine why not get a first generation crx they came 1.3 carby on the HF models and are lighter then second gen rex.
1.3L engine was only in the 1984 CRX 1.3, 1985 was the first year of the HF and the HF had a 1.5L engine, the 1.3L is apparently hard to find parts for and is a rare car to find at all.
If you search around there are newer Honda engines that were only sold in Japan that are 1.2L and 1.3L fuel injected engines, I think there was a V-tec in that size and there was another design of the 1.2L that was sold in the JDM Honda Fit that that seemed pretty slick, if you can find an importer that is willing to get an odd engine like that, it might be worth while.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 05:35 AM   #13 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 579

Princess - '92 MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
90 day: 33.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 113 Times in 79 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
Originally Posted by rx191 View Post
the top chop would focus mainly on the back of the car, i want to drop the deck lid about 3 inches, almost the height of the rear tail lights. it would essentially be the same as adding a boat tail as there would be less area behind the car. i wish i could use photoshop better i could show you
Changing the angle of the rear slope might actually worsen things.
__________________



Remember, even if you win the rat race - you're still a rat.

2010: 454.92L for 5313.90km => 8.56L/100km (27.5MPG US) (5 months)
2011: 606.11L for 7754.04km => 7.82L/100km (30.1MPG US) (Full year)
2012: 170.10L for 2405.00km => 7.07L/100km (33.3MPG US) (In progress)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 09:01 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: williamsburg, virginia
Posts: 2,061

Vulcan - '05 Vulcan 500 LTD
90 day: 60.08 mpg (US)

Mag Pearl - '011 Fiesta SE Hatch
90 day: 45.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 108
Thanked 309 Times in 228 Posts
It seems like you appreciate the TDI engine but not the rest of the car. I think someone here put a TDI engine in a CRX, another put a VX engine in a CRX.
Probably the best setup would be the 1.3 IDSI engine in the Honda Civic Hybrid.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 03:31 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 233
Thanks: 11
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rx191 View Post
i have thought of the tdi cars, but being a mechanic i wouldn't want to own one. The engine will last forever, everything around it will fall apart.
i plan on redoing the interior some to make the car a much nicer ride for sure, the rest of the car i know can handle the drive. a first gen has crossed my mind.

the top chop would focus mainly on the back of the car, i want to drop the deck lid about 3 inches, almost the height of the rear tail lights. it would essentially be the same as adding a boat tail as there would be less area behind the car. i wish i could use photoshop better i could show you
Now I see what you mean about chopping it. That would be relatively easy compared with chopping the entire roof which would be a PITA.

I think it would clean up the aero some. I think a much easier and probably cleaner, aerodynamically speaking, way would be to just tack on a boat tail. Not much weight, really and it would give you the option of restoring to original later on if the economy ever picks up and people aren't forced to drive ridiculous distances for a paycheck.

Good luck, whatever you do.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 03:33 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 233
Thanks: 11
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
Changing the angle of the rear slope might actually worsen things.
I understand what you are saying, but, I think it would help, as it would get rid of that big flat wall on the back which is aerodynamically horrible.

I do think keeping the existing line and adding a boat tail is the way to go.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 06:13 PM   #17 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 579

Princess - '92 MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
90 day: 33.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 113 Times in 79 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
pete c: It may be counterintuitive, but a flat bit in the rear is not the worst possible thing. In fact, the latest rage in car aero design is to shape your car like the template, and when you reach a point where you no longer wish to have car, you simply cut it off.
__________________



Remember, even if you win the rat race - you're still a rat.

2010: 454.92L for 5313.90km => 8.56L/100km (27.5MPG US) (5 months)
2011: 606.11L for 7754.04km => 7.82L/100km (30.1MPG US) (Full year)
2012: 170.10L for 2405.00km => 7.07L/100km (33.3MPG US) (In progress)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2012, 06:49 PM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
HydroJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
You'll actually want to raise the rear of the car up to better follow the template for attached flow. I'd definitely consider adding a boat tail that follows the curve of the template.

examples:

Aerodynamic Streamlining Template Overlay for ZX2?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com