Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-04-2011, 01:18 AM   #1 (permalink)
True performance
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 13

The Lude - '92 Prelude Si 4ws
90 day: 25.99 mpg (US)

Angel - '92 Camaro RS
90 day: 22.58 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Cutting fuel to cylinders

I've read about people putting kill switches on to cut the signal to the injectors momentarily to kill the engine for coasting. I got to thinking, what if you cut one or two of the cylinders (more for larger engines like a v8 or v6) and run the car at highway speeds - just a steady pace. My car uses about 20hp at 70 mph. I'm sure 3 cylinders would carry it easily and I would hardly notice that 1 cylinder is missing - and 2 cylinders would probably still carry the car just fine.

Has anyone tried anything like this? It would be more convenient than pulse & glide and could have comparable results. I've gotten the wiring figured out I believe so my only question is this: Is there going to be any damage caused from cutting the signal to the fuel injectors for extended periods of time? I would assume that if one cylinder never had combustion take place, it would be in better shape than the other cylinders which had the extra stress of the combustion heat and pressure. So I would think there would NOT be any long term damage caused by doing this but please, correct me if I could be wrong - I cannot afford to blow my engine right now.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 02:03 AM   #2 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,877

Svietlana - '05 307 SW
Diesel
90 day: 55.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 668
Thanked 361 Times in 229 Posts
Cylinder deactivation discussion
Cylinder deactivation attempt
Killing individual cylinder ignition
idea, 4 cylinder to 2 cylinder engine conversion
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell

Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 03:01 AM   #3 (permalink)
Blow stuff up
 
phunky.buddha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: DFW Metro, TX
Posts: 62

S2000 - '03 S2000
Team Honda
90 day: 24.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Without clicking through to the links- just from an engineer's perspective- it would be a VERY bad idea to just cut fuel to one or two cylinders. You don't want to upset the balance of your engine like that. Cutting 1 cylinder out of 4 if you're talking about the Prelude in your profile would mean something like this:

1 - 3 - 4 - 2 <-- normal firing order

1 - 3 - x - 2 <-- really lumpy

It would feel like your laundry machine with a huge weight stuck on one side during the spin cycle... which in an engine means lots of vibration -> dead bearings -> oops I need a crankshaft. Or something along those lines.
__________________
Intercrew Auto Salon
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 11:09 AM   #4 (permalink)
True performance
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 13

The Lude - '92 Prelude Si 4ws
90 day: 25.99 mpg (US)

Angel - '92 Camaro RS
90 day: 22.58 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
See, I knew someone would think about something that I wasn't. Thanks a lot - glad I didn't try that! I guess I'll just install the kill switch to cut fuel to all cylinders for pulse & glide.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 02:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Was MI, then IN, Now SC.
Posts: 49

Moostange - '07 Mustang GT
Last 3: 21.8 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The bigger issue to me would be the emissions equipment and fuel control. Without shutting off the non-firing cylinder completely, it is pumping air into the exhaust. That will throw the O2 sensor for a loop and the computer will dump fuel in to try to burn the extra Oxygen it is detecting.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2011, 01:08 AM   #6 (permalink)
True performance
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 13

The Lude - '92 Prelude Si 4ws
90 day: 25.99 mpg (US)

Angel - '92 Camaro RS
90 day: 22.58 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I had thought about that and I figured it would be a pretty big issue - burning rich and throwing check engine codes. The fresh air would definitely mess with the computer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2011, 01:43 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
vskid3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 88

Civic DX - '97 Civic DX
90 day: 34.15 mpg (US)

GTO - '04 GTO
90 day: 22.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
What about using two separate computers? Have a V8 that is treated like two 4cyl, have an intake and exhaust dedicated for each side. Then you can just kill the fuel to one side (and open that side's throttle to reduce pumping loses), and the other computer doesn't have a clue. Kind of a roundabout way of doing it, but probably the easiest DIY solution.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2011, 08:09 AM   #8 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,421

Vegan Powa! - '91 CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 81 Times in 67 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy Send a message via Skype™ to SVOboy
Quote:
Originally Posted by vskid3 View Post
What about using two separate computers? Have a V8 that is treated like two 4cyl, have an intake and exhaust dedicated for each side. Then you can just kill the fuel to one side (and open that side's throttle to reduce pumping loses), and the other computer doesn't have a clue. Kind of a roundabout way of doing it, but probably the easiest DIY solution.
This doesn't sound like a very good solution, as not only would you have to somehow decode and reprogram your car's fuel injection programming, but you'd also have to design and build a set of dual intakes to accomodate these sorts of things.

Either way, I wouldn't bother with trying to shut off fuel to certain cylinders. Unless the engine is designed for it from the git go, it won't work out too well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2011, 10:38 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
vskid3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 88

Civic DX - '97 Civic DX
90 day: 34.15 mpg (US)

GTO - '04 GTO
90 day: 22.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I was thinking 2 Megasquirts for ease of modification. By no means would it be easy, it might not even work, but its the way I would go if I were to try it.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2011, 09:32 AM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 75

turquoise - '97 Starlet
90 day: 41.46 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why not relocate the 02 Sensor to the header runner that won't be connected to a deactivating cylinder?

You may still have an Engine balance issue, but Oil pressure would remain normal so I doubt bearings would die prematurely...



(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com