Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
07-11-2011, 03:41 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ˙
Posts: 5,032
Thanks: 156
Thanked 259 Times in 203 Posts
|
Tested: hatch spoiler vs. vortex generators vs. stock hatch, 1996 Ford Aspire
Random lumps attached to your vehicle are not likely to have any positive effect. Vortex generators used on airplanes cause more drag but allow more effective control surfaces. Vortex generators on cars seem to cause more drag, and they don't have control surfaces.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
Last edited by dcb; 07-11-2011 at 03:50 PM..
|
|
|
|
07-11-2011, 05:06 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
"Inconceivable"
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mancelona, MI
Posts: 252
Thanks: 1
Thanked 55 Times in 33 Posts
|
Yes, it will keep burglars and cats from climbing on your car.
__________________
moorecomp
Mancelona, MI
|
|
|
|
07-12-2011, 05:00 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Tenderfoot
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bozeman Montana
Posts: 437
Thanks: 127
Thanked 169 Times in 88 Posts
|
Mo, the only thing you can do to improve your aero here is to make your car longer in the back. It already is a very aerodynamic shape, it is just very short. Doing anything aero in the back part of your car, other than building a plan taper rear extension, will in all likelihood hurt your mileage, or waste your time, money & effort.

|
|
|
|
07-12-2011, 12:09 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
DieselMiser
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 678
Thanks: 16
Thanked 79 Times in 62 Posts
|
MoMoris,
The airtabs inventor actually tested them in a wind tunnel on a hatchback. He showed a 4% reduction in drag. This however was done by a professional and not an amateur.
they have some of the results in a pdf but no photos of the placement http://www.airtab.com/MicrosoftWordHondaWTReportV6.pdf
They can work. You may need a wind tunnel to get it right however.
__________________
|
|
|
|
07-12-2011, 12:21 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ˙
Posts: 5,032
Thanks: 156
Thanked 259 Times in 203 Posts
|
This thread inspired me to dredge up another concept, I see these were only tested on the sides, and would like to have an understanding of why rounded sides are everywhere when perhaps a sharp transition would be better. If the sides should be sharp for best aero (once the efficiency/handling compromises are understood) then that would seem a less complicated mod or one more likely to give results. A clear strip of plexiglass glued to the rear sides might suffice. Mini-boattail
But we don't know for sure if these specially designed VG would help on the top, the author speculates there.
Why so many rounded corners on the TE?
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
|
07-12-2011, 03:51 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,956
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
|
So far, nobody on here has been able to get better fuel economy with vortex generators.
They do help to smooth the airflow, but seem to also introduce extra drag canceling out their positive effect.
|
|
|
|
07-12-2011, 06:15 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,975
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 807 Times in 469 Posts
|
Hucho
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb
This thread inspired me to dredge up another concept, I see these were only tested on the sides, and would like to have an understanding of why rounded sides are everywhere when perhaps a sharp transition would be better. If the sides should be sharp for best aero (once the efficiency/handling compromises are understood) then that would seem a less complicated mod or one more likely to give results. A clear strip of plexiglass glued to the rear sides might suffice. Mini-boattail
But we don't know for sure if these specially designed VG would help on the top, the author speculates there.
Why so many rounded corners on the TE?
|
dcb,if you can snag a copy of Hucho's book ( any ) you'll find a very lengthy discussion on edge radii.And I think you'll find that it's not a 1-size-fits -all sort of technology, when comparing squareback,notchback,and fastback bodies.
|
|
|
|
07-12-2011, 06:40 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 12
DGC - '08 Grand Caravan SXT 90 day: 17.39 mpg (US) Buick - '01 LeSabre Limited 90 day: 18.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb
This thread inspired me to dredge up another concept, I see these were only tested on the sides, and would like to have an understanding of why rounded sides are everywhere when perhaps a sharp transition would be better...[/url]
|
Mainly because its the look the public has been going for. You have to remember that most people, however simple minded they may be, buy cars based on how they like they look first and foremost and car manufacturers are well aware of this. Plus, if it "looks" aerodynamic to the untrained plebeian eye, they assume it is. Most people assume smooth curves = aerodynamic when we here know this to not necessarily always be the case. Curves are good and have their places - just not everywhere. (I can think of several places I really like curves....hahaha....but I digress.)
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pnambic For This Useful Post:
|
|
|