Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-03-2009, 02:06 AM   #21 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
Christ -



Oooooh, lots of combos here :

1 - Lower the front by 2 inches.
2 - Lower the front by 1 inch and raise the rear by 1 inch.
3 - Reduce the diameter of the front wheels by 1 inch and increase the diameter of the rear wheels by 1 inch. You'd get the 2 inch net and you could *claim* you were going for a classic race car look.

The first is the probably the best, but there's room for more choices.

CarloSW2
Doing the highlighted option would only get you 1/2" lowering in the front, and 1/2" raise in the rear. You'd need to double your lift/lower in tire diameter to net the same gain as altering the suspension.

I'm sure you know that, but I'd like to make it clear for others.

(Increasing the Radius by the same number as a suspension mod would create the same overall lift/lower, but the diameter is R2, which is to say that R = 0.5*D.)


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 03:55 AM   #22 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 380

Silverado - '03 Silverado W/T
Pickups
90 day: 17.89 mpg (US)

Ninja 650R - '06 Ninja 650R
90 day: 52.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
Carlos - Downforce. They use them in NHRA/IHRA as well.

I don't remember the whole reason they work, but I think I remember something about Bernoulli in there, or maybe I was day dreaming during that lecture. Either way, they're there to produce downforce.
Land speed racing is a whole different animal than drag racing. That spoiler is undoubtedly designed to reduce drag as well as reduce lift. At Bonneville, reducing Cd is the number one goal of body design. Often ballast will be added instead of spoilers to add downforce for traction since you have a long distance to get up to your top speed.

I've got a book called Competition Car Aerodynamics that discusses the effect of angle and spoiler length in some detail. According to it, on a typical stock bodied car, a spoiler with an angle less than 20° can both reduce lift and reduce drag.

Mike
__________________
2003 Silverado:
Aero Mods


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 04:02 PM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,607
Thanks: 870
Thanked 636 Times in 372 Posts
help?

without endplates it's already been emasculated by GM.It's not large enough to effect much change even if it was "complete",and without the car or a set of blueprints for the car, it would be hard to calculate anything.---------- If it were mine I'd keep it.If I were going to investigate drag reduction in that region of the car,I suspect the final spoiler would be quite different.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 12:24 AM   #24 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 80

Deceptive - '98 Neon R/T
90 day: 44.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
Land speed racing is a whole different animal than drag racing. That spoiler is undoubtedly designed to reduce drag as well as reduce lift. At Bonneville, reducing Cd is the number one goal of body design. Often ballast will be added instead of spoilers to add downforce for traction since you have a long distance to get up to your top speed.

I've got a book called Competition Car Aerodynamics that discusses the effect of angle and spoiler length in some detail. According to it, on a typical stock bodied car, a spoiler with an angle less than 20° can both reduce lift and reduce drag.

Mike

awesome book, even if its more related to racing, some of the stuff in it can still help here


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.php/do-rear-spoilers-wings-help-any-10434.html
Posted By For Type Date
Do Rear Spoilers / Wings Help Any? - Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com This thread Refback 10-30-2009 01:39 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to decide whether to remove rear spoiler to decrease drag, improve mileage MetroMPG Aerodynamics 91 07-05-2011 02:59 PM
Tuft Testing - "Vortekz" vortex generators on 2003 Jetta Rear Window Deezler Aerodynamics 22 09-04-2010 02:10 PM
Dual Fuel, electric rear wheel drive, gasoline front wheel drive bucknmusky DIY / How-to 36 07-15-2009 11:45 AM
Rear Alignment: Drivability vs Economy Southcross EcoModding Central 11 04-22-2009 10:40 PM
tigra AERO PROJECT rear end question fabrio. Aerodynamics 19 03-31-2008 01:01 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com