Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-10-2013, 01:04 AM   #11 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
There are plenty of instances where steel wheels can be lighter than alloy show off wheels.
Also if you get the light forged wheels and happen to slide into something immoveable the wheels tend to break, saving you from bending or breaking an axle.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-10-2013, 02:50 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 17
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Smaller wheels will usually save fuel I've found on bigger trucks. My buddy went from 20" wheels to 17's on his diesel pickup and gained like 2mpg. Same size overall just the smaller and lighter wheels. Rotating mass is much more important than overall weight.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Superdutytd For This Useful Post:
t vago (01-10-2013)
Old 01-13-2013, 06:51 PM   #13 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
In order to provide some small amount of data for this debate, I have purchased a set of stock steel wheels for my Magnum. Today, I swapped out my stock alloy wheels with the steel wheels, and tomorrow I will top off the tire pressure and verify lug nut torque and do my daily commute thingy.

The steel rim weighs 23 lb 7 oz, and the alloy wheel weighs 22 lb 2 oz.

Stock alloy (10.035 kg):


Stock steel (10.660 kg):


On a side note, I got a really good deal. Normally, steel wheels go for about $60 per wheel in my neck of the woods. However, I found somebody who was willing to sell his wheels for $50 for the entire set.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to t vago For This Useful Post:
ECONORAM (01-15-2013)
Old 01-14-2013, 06:26 AM   #14 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Don't forget that tires have a HUGE variation in rolling resistance. If you are going to do A-B-A testing, the tires have to be indentical for both sets - and that includes the amount of wear.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
ECONORAM (01-29-2013)
Old 01-14-2013, 01:01 PM   #15 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
Don't forget that tires have a HUGE variation in rolling resistance. If you are going to do A-B-A testing, the tires have to be indentical for both sets - and that includes the amount of wear.
Well, the tires themselves are identical. They're the same tires. Only the wheels have changed. ("the wheels have been changed to protect the innocent...")

Now, I'm not quite sure the tires remained in their same positions when I had the wheels changed. That might affect the results, but very likely not in a statistically significant way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 10:25 PM   #16 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
Were you considering doing warm air intake or more EGR or cooled EGR on your diesel?
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 03:59 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
There are loads of dodge trucks with 5x5.5 alloys in junkyards up here. Fords too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2013, 09:29 PM   #18 (permalink)
halos.com
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 528

ECONORAM - '07 Dodge RAM 1500 QC SLT flex-fuel
90 day: 18.16 mpg (US)

the Avenger - '08 Dodge Avenger SXT
90 day: 27.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ECONORAM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller88 View Post
There are loads of dodge trucks with 5x5.5 alloys in junkyards up here. Fords too.
I have considered that. I almost bought a set from the Classifieds on the DodgeTalk forum, but shipping was too expensive. They were OEM 17s and he weighed them at 28# each. Not as light as Centerlines, but certainly lighter than my 20s.

[edit] I've held off from pursuing 17" wheels because I am still looking to do a manual tranny swap. The factory 6-speed has a .78 top gear, and NV3500s (prior to the 6-sp) have a .73 top gear. The auto's top is .67, 4th is .75...and the truck doesn't do so great with the .75 on the highway. I've tried it a few times. I figure with 17" wheels the tires would be so short I'd regret it after the tranny swap. Typical size for my truck is 265/70R17, which is 31.6 inch diameter. My factory tires are 33 inch. With some math ratio MS Excel work, it looks like the 17s would make the engine turn another 100 rpms at 70 mph, with no other changes. But the .73 NV3500 5th adds another 170 rpm. Yuck.

All that said, I think she who must be obeyed is going to force my hand and make me buy new tires, and that means OEM size...
__________________

Last edited by ECONORAM; 01-31-2013 at 10:15 PM.. Reason: after thought
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2014, 04:19 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ECONORAM View Post

So with 20s, the truck would lose 14# a wheel, or 64# total. With the 18s, the truck would lose 20# a wheel, or 80# total. The 18 inch tires are also about $30 cheaper each, and the wheels are $20 cheaper each.

Hmmmm
I can see how 20 X 4 = 80# total
but I do believe 14 X 4 = 56# total
Not 64# total?
Right?

I mean it seems like basic math.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2014, 10:46 PM   #20 (permalink)
halos.com
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 528

ECONORAM - '07 Dodge RAM 1500 QC SLT flex-fuel
90 day: 18.16 mpg (US)

the Avenger - '08 Dodge Avenger SXT
90 day: 27.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ECONORAM
Steve, you are right. Now I'm even more disappointed. 16x4=64. Bummer. What's even better (or worse, depending on how you look at it) is the fact I discovered the OEM 20" wheels weigh 36# each if painted (like mine), 37# each if chrome plated. So, even less weight change per wheel. I still may go with some 17s like tvago if I can find a set for less than $110/wheel that don't look like ragged crash survivors...

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com