Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-28-2012, 08:30 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Newb
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,813

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 29.58 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Camry - '98 Toyota Camry
90 day: 27.09 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 66.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 635
Thanked 484 Times in 318 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve05ram360 View Post
whats ABA testing?
The A test is the control. Data is gathered before the mod is added to the vehicle.

The B test gathers the data collected after a modification has been performed.

The last A test undoes the modifications and brings the vehicle back to the same condition it was in when doing the control test. This should confirm the original A test data. If it does not, then some condition has changed which should cause the B test to be questioned.

An example of why the second A test could be significantly skewed is changing wind conditions. If the wind changed during testing, then the B data is invalid.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-28-2012, 10:38 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
yeah that makes sense...
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 02:16 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: los angeles, ca
Posts: 136
Thanks: 2
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Grille block, electric fans, and driving slow were worth the most for me.

1997 Dodge Ram 3500 Dualie Cummins - Diesel Power Magazine
__________________
1989 Dodge Diesel 972rwhp, 27mpg.
1971 Nova tubbed, solid cam 355 w/nitrous, 8mpg (sorry).
1960 Nash DIY Hybrid Project
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 01:59 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Update... did the grille block, 2nd air dam, tonneau & tailgate spoiler and got a consistent 20.2 mpg on my test run. Then went to the Smarty UDC for engine control and got that up to 22.2 on that same run and it is repeatable. I expect that with a 22 mpg on tap doing 65 I should be easily able to get the 20 mpg on the hiway I was shooting for.

Truck still has the 3" lift, 34" tires and a 180* t-stat. I may test further with a hotter t-stat once I get a new radiator (mines leaking)

Thanks to everyone for their input! (greatly appreciated)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 08:18 PM   #15 (permalink)
halos.com
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cibolo, TX
Posts: 495

ECONORAM - '07 Dodge RAM 1500 QC SLT flex-fuel
90 day: 18.16 mpg (US)

the Avenger - '08 Dodge Avenger SXT
90 day: 27.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 345
Thanked 79 Times in 68 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ECONORAM
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve05ram360 View Post
whats ABA testing?
Good how-to here: How to properly test modifications (AKA: don't believe every MPG claim you read)

I always thought turbos like large exhausts...

You might want to look at my garage picks for some aero ideas. Check Big Dave's truck also.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 09:34 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
just read the link you provided, I pretty much did just that. Always the same time of day, out & back on the interstate at a part of the day where traffic would be dropping off, let cruise control handle the throttle over the route as much as possible (95% of the way if not more). Didnt do ABA testing because of the costs involved (unemployed ATM) but I did find that during the testing I was able to get repeatable runs. I picked days that were similar in temps and forecasts and avoided windy rainy days. I also logged each run for various parameters in case I wanted to pick thru the data (using LabView to analyze/pick it apart).

I wish there was a way to give a good measure of the city mpg so I could check out the rest of the tune I modified. Would be sweet to get into the 17's in the city but I wont hold my breath.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 01:27 AM   #17 (permalink)
V8 guy
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 2,984

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 12.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 58
Thanked 461 Times in 349 Posts
Turbo diesels love wide open exhausts.

Unlike a N/A gas engine a turbodiesel is trying to put its full displacement or more out the exhaust every 2 crank rotations.

You don't really want a 180'F thermostat in a diesel.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1985 chevy camaro mostly stock.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 09:05 AM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Turbo diesels love wide open exhausts.

Unlike a N/A gas engine a turbodiesel is trying to put its full displacement or more out the exhaust every 2 crank rotations.

You don't really want a 180'F thermostat in a diesel.
Wide open exhausts are best for competition use in my experience, no restrictions equal great top end power and lower mpg. I have had both an unrestricted intake & exhaust and just the exhaust and both times fe sucked. I have found that anything that reduces part throttle low end torque will reduce mpg...

Since blocking the grille i have seen coolant temps rise approx 5-8*f overall, i tried to get a definite answer thru searching the web & forums to find out if a hotter stat was worth swapping in and could not find anything. Any personal experience with it on a diesel? I have a leaky radiator that i will need to swap out with an all aluminum one soon and plan on fitting the truck with a couple of taurus fans so i can ditch the oem fan. I could probably go experiment with the hotter tstats before i do and get my own answer before i get it done...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 03:39 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
DieselX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Travel Trailer
Posts: 26

X - '02 Ford Excursion Limited
Thanks: 18
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
http://www.dieselsite.com/dieselsite203thermostat.aspx

Here is some info on the themostat. This is for Ford but it gives you an idea of the temp range diesel trucks prefer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 03:59 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks I saw & read that. Researched part numbers and found a 200* stant that should be a drop in. I may go try it sooner rather than later.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com