Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-15-2011, 02:51 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Deltona, FL, U.S.
Posts: 29

tow vehicle - '97 4runner limited

none - '09 civic si

none - '91 crx dx

sleepy - '91 CRX dx
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
drafting semi's

okay, first off I know it is dangerous...

I recently discovered that you can be 50 to 100 ft back and still see a benefit?

I heard mythbusters found a pretty significant increase all the way back to 100ft?
Or did i hear wrong?

I am pretty confident that i can still be safe at 50-100 ft back, and was wondering if anyone with scangauges have done any informal tests with this?

In the past I've drafted within 10-15 ft off semi's with little problem.
However, i dont drive with that kind of risk level anymore...

but 100 ft is quite safe in my opinion

thoughts?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
1991 honda crx dx
1993 honda civic hatch
1997 toyota 4runner
2006 honda civic si
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 02:59 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
99metro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Briggsdale, Colorado
Posts: 291

putt-putt - '99 Metro Base
Team Metro
90 day: 58.76 mpg (US)

Dusty - '89 Bronco XLT
90 day: 13.89 mpg (US)

Cowboy - '90 Bronco XLT
90 day: 17.42 mpg (US)

HayHauler - '06 3500 ST
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 12 Posts
Well, 65-70 feet or so is about 1 of their length. Too close for me. I like to be 3 of their lengths behind and no more than 55 mph. I love slow trucks!

PS Yes, I use the scanguage to confirm this - AND it depends on wind speed and direction. Side winds - forget it. Head winds - nice benefit.
__________________
2006 3500 Dodge QC/FB 5.9 handshaker
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 03:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Deltona, FL, U.S.
Posts: 29

tow vehicle - '97 4runner limited

none - '09 civic si

none - '91 crx dx

sleepy - '91 CRX dx
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99metro View Post
Well, 65-70 feet or so is about 1 of their length. Too close for me. I like to be 3 of their lengths behind and no more than 55 mph. I love slow trucks!

PS Yes, I use the scanguage to confirm this - AND it depends on wind speed and direction. Side winds - forget it. Head winds - nice benefit.
okay, so a full semi truck length back you are seeing an increase?

i understand about the side winds...been there done that

so 65-70 ft back, what kind of increase are we talking here?
__________________
1991 honda crx dx
1993 honda civic hatch
1997 toyota 4runner
2006 honda civic si
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 03:38 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
99metro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Briggsdale, Colorado
Posts: 291

putt-putt - '99 Metro Base
Team Metro
90 day: 58.76 mpg (US)

Dusty - '89 Bronco XLT
90 day: 13.89 mpg (US)

Cowboy - '90 Bronco XLT
90 day: 17.42 mpg (US)

HayHauler - '06 3500 ST
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 12 Posts
I can get roughly 10-20% from drafting. Over 55 mph the benefits decrease. In my little car, I can feel the difference like night and day. I get back a little too far and I have to stay squarely behind him to stay in the draft. A little to the left or right can throw me back out of the envelope. I get way too far behind and I can feel the buffeting which tells me I am out of the envelope, plus the scangauge confirms this. After 65 mph, I give up and fall back to my grandpa driving. This is just my informal findings.
__________________
2006 3500 Dodge QC/FB 5.9 handshaker
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 06:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Deltona, FL, U.S.
Posts: 29

tow vehicle - '97 4runner limited

none - '09 civic si

none - '91 crx dx

sleepy - '91 CRX dx
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99metro View Post
I can get roughly 10-20% from drafting. Over 55 mph the benefits decrease. In my little car, I can feel the difference like night and day. I get back a little too far and I have to stay squarely behind him to stay in the draft. A little to the left or right can throw me back out of the envelope. I get way too far behind and I can feel the buffeting which tells me I am out of the envelope, plus the scangauge confirms this. After 65 mph, I give up and fall back to my grandpa driving. This is just my informal findings.
wow, well 10-20% is a lot.
Damn, I need to bite the bullet and buy a scangauge...with xmas time here, we have been spending and spending and spending, lol

I hate to sound like I'm beating a dead horse...but WHY do you think over 55 there is a decrease in benefit? If find most of the semi's in my area are doing 65 or so....
And how far, that you have found personally, is usually too far away? A full truck length? Less or more?

I will get a scangauge soon, and try and do some testing and report what I find.

I'm just so intrigued as I thought I would never draft again until I found that you can do it from so far away. To me, this is a safe enough distance...100ft that is...
__________________
1991 honda crx dx
1993 honda civic hatch
1997 toyota 4runner
2006 honda civic si
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 06:46 PM   #6 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 1,924
Thanks: 750
Thanked 135 Times in 84 Posts
So I saw this gasoline tanker and decided to give chase....
__________________
"You don't fail until you give up. You learn, and move on." - Christ

" Hypermiling is not going slow, it's driving with more intelligence." - UFO
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 08:43 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Steaming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lynchburg, Va
Posts: 28

Apollo 11 - '02 Ram 1500

Saphire - '06 Insight
Thanks: 14
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Last time I drove down the highway in the rain, I observed the spray in the air comming off the back of a semi in front of me.

I'm guessing it must be a rough indicator of the proportions of the hole they punch through the atmosphere and may give an idea of where the sweet spot is for drafting in other conditions. (Although I suspect the weight of the water vapor would tend to show a smaller clear pocket than in dry conditions.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 09:22 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ashland, WI
Posts: 247

Nameless - '06 Canyon
90 day: 33.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 37 Times in 28 Posts
I drafted behind a Greyhound bus on a motorcycle once. The turbulence was like getting between two guys boxing each other wearing pillows for gloves. It was on one of those California 12 lane freeways with heavy traffic.

I did not save any gas, and got beat up in the process.
__________________
34.9 MPG summer 2011. Winter 2011-2012 was warm, so only dropped to 30.1 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 09:28 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 225

Grasshopper - '011 Fiesta SES
Team Ford
90 day: 50.37 mpg (US)
Thanks: 64
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattbatson View Post
wow, well 10-20% is a lot.

I hate to sound like I'm beating a dead horse...but WHY do you think over 55 there is a decrease in benefit?
Over 55 the benefit of the cleaner air is overcome by all the other factors of increased speed.

I'm a big fan of minimum safe following distances. Two seconds is good three is better. The faster the truck is going the further back you should follow. 65-75 feet at 55 is way closer than what is safe. At 65+ that distance is plain stupid. I don't like people riding my butt, why would I do it to others?

Kirk
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2011, 09:53 PM   #10 (permalink)
Intermediate EcoDriver
 
Mustang Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Arizona - It's a DRY cold..
Posts: 264

White Pony - '07 Mustang V6 Premium Coupe
Team Ford
90 day: 29.98 mpg (US)

Big Red - '89 F-250 4WD Custom
90 day: 15.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 24 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Over 55 the benefit of the cleaner air is overcome by all the other factors of increased speed.

I'm a big fan of minimum safe following distances. Two seconds is good three is better. The faster the truck is going the further back you should follow. 65-75 feet at 55 is way closer than what is safe. At 65+ that distance is plain stupid. I don't like people riding my butt, why would I do it to others?
I agree. Safety is more important to me than miniscule increases in fuel economy.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Fuel economy is nice, but sometimes I just gotta put the spurs to my pony!


Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguitarguy View Post
Just 'cuz you can't do it, don't mean it can't be done...
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com