Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-13-2008, 10:25 AM   #51 (permalink)
Veggiedynamics
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 680

Extreme CRX-HF - '87 CRX custom areo
90 day: 50.8 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I had a turismo, had the same nose as the rampage, was a very fuel efficient car, and looked decent too, I had a buddy with a 2.2 turbo Shelby like the one above that he had went through the motor and beefed up a bit, he was the fastest guy in town... there muscle cars would want to race him at stop lights and he'd race, then and after launching and beating the muscle car a bit, he let them pull up on him then he'd get back into it and pull ahead again just to annoy the led sled drivers.. totally insane car.. was basically the Honda civic of its day.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 11:43 PM   #52 (permalink)
Believe the HYPErmiler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Downhill
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Back to this "fastback crap"....I've been wondering what the deal is with the Kammback since I saw AndrewJ glue one on his buggy...

From Wikipedia: "Kamm showed that a better drag-reducing tail-end design for a car is a tapering teardrop shape that cuts off abruptly.

Prior to his thesis, the teardrop tapering smoothly to a point was considered optimal. Kamm showed that an abbreviated teardrop actually worked better; the air still flows as if the entire teardrop were still there, but without the surface drag of the long point."

Also more reading at http://homepage.mac.com/christopher....backStory.html


Gleaned from my research, apparently the optimal shape is a teardrop that's cut off where the cross-sectional area of it is 50% of the maximum of the whole drop. To me, that means that the truck-fastback would be right on the money, it seems like the top part of the cab is half and the tailgate is half. The only bad thing (apparently) is that the slope back is actually a bit too shallow. A shorter bed would be better for a bit until you start looking like a CRX, then you're good.

So oddly enough to me, what Smoky says is correct except the part that it wouldn't work....he notes that the aero experts want an abruptly truncated tail like the CRX, 300ZX, etc....but not a fastback truck. Yet, I look at a fastback truck, it has the truncated tail like those cars, just a bit longer in the tail.

The truncated thing fascinates me...not necessarily in a good way. Why the heck would that be BETTER than a full tail? I read why, but it still seems counterintuitive to me.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.php/easy-aero-fix-modding-pickup-313.html
Posted By For Type Date
For Sale: 1987 GLHS $1,100 by 12/30/09 This thread Refback 07-28-2011 12:39 PM
For Sale: 1987 GLHS $1,100 by 12/30/09 - Turbo Mopar Forums This thread Refback 12-15-2009 05:04 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com