Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

View Poll Results: Do you think people would buy a diesel-powered 60s American Classic?
Yes, they'd be lining up to pay $8k or more 9 17.65%
Sure, there'd be a few people interested in paying $6k-8k 15 29.41%
Good luck, I'm sure someone would pay $4k-6k 10 19.61%
It's your dream, but you might be alone on this one 17 33.33%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-27-2011, 07:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Diesel Swaps into 50s/60s Classics

Hey all, new to the forum.

I'm considering swapping diesel engines into 50s or 60s American cars and was referred to a post on this forum by someone over at the Benzworld.org forums, particularly to the V8 6.5L diesel Corvette thread.

My dream car is a diesel '66 or '67 Mercury Comet, but I'm also considering the profit potential of converting these classics and selling them.

I was originally considering swapping a Mercedes OM617 3.0L turbo engine and transmission, but was told that the 6.2 and 6.5L Detroit diesels might be direct bolt-ons to the older GM transmissions. Since they're V8's they also would fit better into the engine bay. The mpg's reported on the vette are also much higher than I expected.

What do people think of doing such a swap?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-29-2011, 09:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 668 Times in 410 Posts
I don't see classic car guys wanting diesels. They're usually more interested in factory correct engines and gas power. Also, speed is usually more important than fuel economy. It might be worth asking around to people in the classic car community before you invest any money into this.

Not to say you shouldn't do this, but I've been attending summer car shows multiple times a week for a few years and have not seen a single diesel conversion.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 09:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
People have that kind of money these days?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 10:13 PM   #4 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,443

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,209
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
I don't think the idea is crazy, but I also can't see there being a lot of interest, for reasons Sven elaborated on.

I'd be happy if I could just buy a modern diesel Japanese car.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 10:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
As far as classic car guys being interested in the "correct" engines, the midwest guys at least seem to want to stick a 350 Chevy into everything from a Radio Flyer wagon to a school bus.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Gasoline Fumes (01-16-2012), rmay635703 (01-19-2012)
Old 12-29-2011, 11:32 PM   #6 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacolocho View Post

but was told that the 6.2 and 6.5L Detroit diesels might be direct bolt-ons to the older GM transmissions. Since they're V8's they also would fit better into the engine bay.
The 6.2L and 6.5L share the same transmission bolt pattern as the small block and big block chevy. The chevy diesels and SBC, BBC all share the same motor mounts too.

What else do you want to know about the 6.2 and 6.5 diesels?
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 11:42 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
the 6.2 and 6.5 are not very good diesels in the grand scheme of things. In particular, the 6.5 computer controlled engine is a HORRIBLE candidate for a swap.

If you want to do a diesel swap, do a Kubota or Perkins swap into a small car. Use Kennedy for the adapters.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 11:54 PM   #8 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
If some one were to swap a 6.5L they likely would not use the electronic controlled injector pump.
The early 6.5L and all 6.2L injector pumps would be the best choise. The stanadine 4911 pump was the best all mechanical pump they made, it is most favored for 6.5 and 6.2 build ups.
The 6.2 and 6.5 engine have 2 main serries of pumps DB2 (mechanical) and DB4 (electronic problem child). The DB4 serries system should be avoided at all costs.
The 4911 pump is DB2 serries.
I do not have the 4911 pump in my 6.5L, I have the other less notable DB2 serries pump, but it gets me around. In almost 6 year I have never had a problem with my DB2 pump.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 02:09 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Wow, thanks for all the info

This would actually potentially be part of a larger non-profit org, so if it was we'd be doing swaps from vehicles that were donated. Getting a Chevy or GMC diesel pickup donated is pretty possible, especially the older 6.2L.

The market would be less "the classic car guys" than someone looking to switch over to diesel for its fuel efficiency and run on biofuels (like all the folks driving Mercedes diesels out here on the west coast), but wanting to drive something a little more interesting. Maybe $7k or $8k is a little optimistic for a sedan.

Good to know about the IP difference. Were the DB2 and DB4 pumps used on different model years? Or do I just have to look at the engine and see if it's electronic in order to find out?

Quote:
The 6.2L and 6.5L share the same transmission bolt pattern as the small block and big block chevy. The chevy diesels and SBC, BBC all share the same motor mounts too.

What else do you want to know about the 6.2 and 6.5 diesels?
This is great to know. Do you know what vehicles use the SBC/LBC tranny and motor mount bolt patterns? Is it all GMs? (Chevy, Buick, Pontiac, Cadillac, Oldsmobile)
Do you know how the gearing would work mating those old transmissions to the 6.2L/6.5L?
Do you think 35+mpg could be expected?
And, as a more personal interest, would those transmissions be able to handle heavy towing?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 02:42 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
If you were to put a frightliner diesel engine in a pickup truck then I could see a market there, but people who want old cars that are shinny and new want something slick and impressive, building classic cars as electric would almost be more practical, but not.
I think the frightliner vans have a 2.5l turbo diesel engine in them, so it seems like it could fit in a wide range of vehicles, a ford ranger with it would be impressive as a tow vehicle.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com