Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-14-2009, 03:25 PM   #11 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
I doubt there's any slipping going on. My commuting distance traveled doesn't change between rainy days and dry days.

I've been running "hyper" inflated tires for the duration of the data collection above. (nearly 3 years of daily commuting)

__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-14-2009, 03:28 PM   #12 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
Hello -

Today I got 49.4 MPG on the way to work. I took an alternate route that swapped a few freeway miles for a few city miles, but avoided the monster traffic jams that I was seeing on sigalert.com . I can normally get sub-60 MPG. I think 57 MPG is about "normal" for my regular route. That would mean :

49.4 / 57 = 0.866666 => 86.7% => a 13.3% drop in MPG.

I am not making any scientific claims here, but I think I am seeing "ballpark same" results as the study.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 03:30 PM   #13 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Anything more than the friction necessary to maintain tractive response between the tire and the road is wasted as heat. The water acts as a coolant and friction modifier, reducing the actual Cf between the rubber and the road, as it were. Water which as wet the road to a state of equilibrium will be in small pockets formed in the asphalt, and in such small quantities, water can exhibit qualities of a solid, especially if approached at high velocities, due to the surface tension and overall density. This would suggest that in addition to having a lubricant property, it also "smooths out" the surface of the driven road, which we already know is of benefit to fuel economy, but not tractive motion.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 04:42 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Matt Herring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Andover, MA
Posts: 857

Bone's 2010 Prius - '10 Toyota Prius Black
90 day: 56.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
Over the past two weeks I've had some experience with wet roads (some days more than others) and I've seen about a 10% drop in mpg on the days I specifically tracked my mpg for that day. On my commute to work (same route every day) I average in the 65 mpg range at this time of year. Twice last week on wet roads with ALOT of standing water I averaged 58 and 59 mpg (10-11% drop).

In my Prius ANY water dramatically slows the car...certainly much more than I experienced in my 4runner.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 05:27 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Private
Posts: 282
Thanks: 2
Thanked 73 Times in 47 Posts
I know my EOC distance is not as good on wet roads. Probably the biggest reason for my difference in mpg's. Anyone up for some coastdown testing? Another thing is the humidity and a lower pressure associated with a rain pattern contributes to higher density altitude, which means less efficient engine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 05:53 PM   #16 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 286 Times in 199 Posts
On my commute, I get my best fuel economy in the rain because traffic goes much slower.

On the open road, rain and wind (often seen together) are noticeably detrimental, according to the ScanGauge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 09:11 PM   #17 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
On my commute, I get my best fuel economy in the rain because traffic goes much slower.

On the open road, rain and wind (often seen together) are noticeably detrimental, according to the ScanGauge.
Obviously, you don't live in/near Harrisburg, PA or NY, NY. I can't vouch for other areas, but in those two places specifically, when it rains, even if you can't see 10 feet in front of you, traffic seems to speed up. It's like they know the cops aren't around because they can't do anything even if they were, and they go nuts!
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 10:41 PM   #18 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by moorecomp View Post
I know my EOC distance is not as good on wet roads. Probably the biggest reason for my difference in mpg's. Anyone up for some coastdown testing? Another thing is the humidity and a lower pressure associated with a rain pattern contributes to higher density altitude, which means less efficient engine.
Ah, but some would argue the lower air density = less aerodynamic drag.

And I've read some people swear they get better MPG at altitude, with the less dense intake charge depowering the engine, requiring a wider throttle opening, reducing pumping losses and improving efficiency. Same effect could happen with low vs. high pressure at the same altitude (assuming OBD computer controlled mixture).

And I completely agree about the shorter coasting distance on wet roads.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 01:15 AM   #19 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,691

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,268
Thanked 721 Times in 458 Posts
I've noticed a slight drop in FE (10%) when it's raining. This may be b/c then I drive in gear a little more often, less coasting, especially in traffic. But then I drove slower, and use even more engine braking.

I've also been thinking that effect of raindrops on the car. When a car is going at a constant speed and is hitting drops of rain (whose velocity vector is usually orthogonal to the car's direction of movement - I'm assuming no wind), then each of those drops gets accelerated to the car's speed. When you add up the total weight of all drops over a certain distance or time duration, it's like accelerating a large mass of water.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
cfg83 (10-15-2009)
Old 10-15-2009, 01:42 AM   #20 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Piwo - This falls back on something I thought about, as well.

Since you're hitting all those rain drops, each one having a very small impact which occurs at a random interval, each one of those rain drop impacts is effectively slowing down your forward momentum, by driving your car into the ground with it's (albeit small) impact.

Quantify the amount of force that several hundred gallons of water might have (over a long drive), and of course, you'll see that it really does add up to some force being exerted on the vehicle. Of course, the difference is negligible, I'm sure.

__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com