Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-16-2011, 12:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 265

YJ - '89 Wrangler

FOCUS - '00 Focus ZTS

The Wife's Hot Rod - '09 G8 GT
Last 3: 23.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Electric clutch for mechanical fan?

I read that electric fans are less efficient at cooling than mechanical fans. Converting motion to electricity & back to motion again.

Has anyone with a mechanical fan thought about making an electric clutch instead of using the thermal clutch? It could use the same controls as a single speed electric fan.

I think you would want to use a light weight fan blade to control the weight & accelleration. I have never taken an AC pump apart to know how much the clutch wieghs, or if the clutch could handle the instant torque it will see.

What are your thoughts?

Don


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2011, 01:27 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,674

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 54.91 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
For as much as a radiator fan is on, I'd say electric is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2011, 08:57 PM   #3 (permalink)
50 mpg Fiat 500 Project
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 172

USPS LLV - '91 Postal Truck LLV
90 day: 14.57 mpg (US)

My Stock S/R - '99 Escort ZX2 S/R
Team ZX2
90 day: 25.7 mpg (US)

Screaming Yellow Zonker - '99 Escort ZX2 S/R
Team ZX2
90 day: 28.68 mpg (US)

Black Beauty - '94 Corvette Convertible LT1
90 day: 18.79 mpg (US)

Blanco - '012 500 1.4L MultiAir 5MT
90 day: 37.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
the rotating mass of the clutch system and the drag present even when the clutch is disengaged would probably negate any savings one would make from converting an electric fan to an electro-mechanical one as you suggest, since the electric fan operates during a smaller percentage of the operating time.

best bet is to improve air flow over the radiator to the point of not needing to use the fan.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2011, 12:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Fans are mostly needed for low speed operations so improving the airflow enough to eliminate the need for them is tough.

That said, my F150 has no fan, but then again it sees virtually no stop-n-go town traffic either.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2011, 10:54 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ballarat
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Building one now

Hi, I have a Toyota Landcruiser which uses 30 litres of LPG to the 100 k's so I am building a remote electric clutch for the existing fan. I am useing an old Ford air con compressor clutch which I believe will handle the torque as these compressors use about 3 to 5 hp and start under full load. My fan although spinning free on 6003 2rs bearings will probably be spinning anyway when engaged as the air flowing past it will most likely turn it. The electric clutch pulls 2 amps and is designed to cycle often. Modern cars disengage this clutch at certain speeds automatically. Steve
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 11:57 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,145
Thanks: 9
Thanked 98 Times in 78 Posts
Check out a Mercedes 190e 2.3 or a 90s C220. These cars had a mechanical fan with electric clutch from the factory. There are many others. I replaced mine with a normal puller electric fan because it's more efficient and cheaper to replace. The electric coil is fixed on the water pump behind the fan pulley (doesn't spin).
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2011, 10:03 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ballarat
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks looks good, I am setting the cluch up in place of an existing idler pulley and will make provision for it to be locked together mechanically with a couple of set screws in the case of an electrical fault in the clutch whilst in the middle of nowhere.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 01:59 AM   #8 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Since I've totally removed the mechanical fan on my pickup and seen how little the fan is actually needed, I'd vote for a simple electric fan install just for the fact that- at least for my usage patterns- the fan is barely needed at all thus whatever inefficiency penalty there may be from the mech-elec-mech conversion losses is more than offset by the removal of all mechanical fan losses. Now, if there is a usage pattern that requires much more fan use- like on a tractor- I can see where the clutched mechanical fan would be the more efficient choice.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 12:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
...ah-h-h, but that same "clutch" would work great on an alternator!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 01:22 PM   #10 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...ah-h-h, but that same "clutch" would work great on an alternator!
Would it?



(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com