Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-12-2010, 09:38 AM   #1 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,674

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 54.91 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
Electric water pump effect on warm up times

I've seen it mentioned several times now that electric water pumps reduce warm up time. I think I asked this question in another thread somewhere else and never really got a good answer.

Can anyone explain in detail how an electric water pump can reduce warm up time?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2010, 09:53 AM   #2 (permalink)
EV Wannabe
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 304

The Booger - '92 MX-3
90 day: 23.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 30 Times in 22 Posts
I will argue that an electric water pump will NOT reduce warm up time. If your thermostat is working correctly, your coolant should circulate only in your engine. Stirring a pot of water on your stove will not make it heat up slower. Without coolant flow (aka electric water pump turned off), you will create hot spots in your engine which is not good. The only advantage will be an increase in efficiency by not having to spin a pump and move a bunch of water. If you can run an electric pump though a resistor to severely slow it down during warm up, this could be beneficial. But stopping the pump altogether? Eep...I would be scared of that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2010, 10:01 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 484

Bonnie - '98 Bonneville SSE
3800
90 day: 26.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
I agree with the above statement the only way it could help is by flowing slower when the temp is low but if it only has one speed it will make no difference, I guess if it flows less that stock overall it could do that too.
__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2010, 11:25 AM   #4 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 497

wood hauler - '91 F-250
90 day: 22.06 mpg (US)

3800 Sunfire - '02 Sunfire
Thanks: 27
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
I would be hesitant to use an electric water pump. Electric is not as efficient as direct drive. If the motor burns out, you are stuck. Me tinks de ol fashun wai is bet.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 3.55 10.25" rear.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2010, 12:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,032

pimp mobile - '81 gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 259 Times in 203 Posts
there are some opportunities to save a bit of energy with an electric water pump.

if it is brushless then it can be made very reliable.

you can delete the thermostat with the right control scheme, thermostat is basically a large pumping loss most of the time. The mechanical pump has to work against the thermostat most of the time. An electric pump only has to pump hard enough to keep the temperature correct.

install a more efficient / smart alternator and the electric options get more efficient overall. Direct drive vs belt driven would also help.

options like adding a thermos bottle to store hot coolant for later get much simpler with an electric pump.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2010, 12:57 PM   #6 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,674

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 54.91 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
I agree there is probably room to improve efficiency with an electric pump.

However, will it help with warm up?

So far I would agree with mechman. You can stir a heating pot faster or slower and it still warms up in the same amount of time.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2010, 01:25 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: williamsburg, virginia
Posts: 2,061

Vulcan - '05 Vulcan 500 LTD
90 day: 60.08 mpg (US)

Mag Pearl - '011 Fiesta SE Hatch
90 day: 45.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 108
Thanked 309 Times in 228 Posts
With a bypass hose and properly operating thermostat, you will get a thermosiphon effect with warming coolant.

Early model T Fords used a thermosiphon system with no water pump.

I think you would get a better efficiency return if you regulated the temperature of the coolant entering the engine after leaving the radiator.

The temperature difference between coolant exiting at a 180 degree thermostat and that same coolant entering the engine after going through the radiator can be over 120 degrees.

A combination of a bypass and radiator exit thermostat that keep incoming coolant at the temperature difference experienced in the summertime would (in my opinion) significantly improve overall economy.

Combine a WAI and WCI (warm coolant entry) and you could maintain most of your summertime mileage into some fairly colder temperatures.

Remember the old Packards with the adjustable radiator fins.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2010, 02:00 PM   #8 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
you can delete the thermostat with the right control scheme, thermostat is basically a large pumping loss most of the time. The mechanical pump has to work against the thermostat most of the time. An electric pump only has to pump hard enough to keep the temperature correct.

install a more efficient / smart alternator and the electric options get more efficient overall. Direct drive vs belt driven would also help.

options like adding a thermos bottle to store hot coolant for later get much simpler with an electric pump.
I dunno... pumps and fans draw the most power when they are moving the most fluid. Yes, it seems counterintuitive. Try running a box fan, then throw something against it that blocks the air- it speeds up! If it speeds up, the motor is seeing less load. Do the same thing with a shop vac. Or a sump pump. They all react the same way. So if there's a restriction in an auto cooling system, it should serve to reduce load.

I've long wanted direct drive for accessories though. And a thermos bottle.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2010, 09:31 PM   #9 (permalink)
EV Wannabe
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 304

The Booger - '92 MX-3
90 day: 23.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 30 Times in 22 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
thermostat is basically a large pumping loss most of the time. The mechanical pump has to work against the thermostat most of the time. An electric pump only has to pump hard enough to keep the temperature correct
Nope. When the thermostat is closed, a bypass is open to allow full coolant flow back to the water pump inlet. It takes absolutely no more power to pump through the bypass when the engine is cold than it does to pump through the rad when it is hot. The thermostat is two valves: rad closed/open and bypass open/closed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2010, 09:49 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: belgium, wi
Posts: 262

Bus - '94 School Bus huge

Stupid - '01 Blazer LS
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)

hawk - '00 Superhawk
Thanks: 2
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Electric does work. It is efficient, and uses less power than a mechanical pump. Many cars cannot eliminate the mech. pump because it is driven in the serp. belt system or the timing belt system. Building an idle within these systems would be difficult. Also, some pumps use the block as part of the back of the pump, this provides some difficulties as well. as for speed, for $200 you can buy a pwm to control the speed. I would not use a resistor.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can I use a GENERATOR to power an Electric car directly? Nerys Fossil Fuel Free 123 07-25-2011 09:24 PM
Testing: WAI's effect on engine warm up Daox EcoModding Central 24 01-13-2011 09:41 PM
Electric Cars Push Japan Engine Parts Makers to Crisis Mode tjts1 The Lounge 12 01-17-2010 12:23 PM
Greetings from Maryland! thedarave Introductions 7 10-14-2009 10:47 PM
Run Your Car on Water!!! (emulsion that is) Coyote X EcoModding Central 17 04-01-2009 01:20 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com