Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-06-2009, 01:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Engine Braking

I'm confused on this. It seems to me that since the engine spins faster while braking, then it is burning more fuel, so how is it more efficient?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 02:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 3,067

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
90 day: 67.16 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 52.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Modern engines don't inject fuel while decelerating in gear.
__________________
EcoRenovator.org - Efficient living and green home improvement
Prius Build Thread
Paseo Build Thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 02:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ohhh i see. Thats interesting.
So pretty much the engine is turning but no fuel is being burnt?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 03:11 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Harvest, Alabama
Posts: 239

Suzi - '94 Swift GA
Team Metro
90 day: 48.46 mpg (US)

Prius II - '05 Prius Package 6
90 day: 49.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Yes, but the engine turning is slowing your vehicle down... so it is better than using your breakpads to slow down, but you don't coast as long as if you were coasting in gear.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 02:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bush AK
Posts: 55

Zuk - '88 Samurai
90 day: 18.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I see it repeated all the time, I am curious why engine braking is better than using the pads? I definitely understand the concept on long hills where the pads will heat but for normal driving around town? Brake pads for a car are pretty cheap and easy to replace.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 02:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 493

Jeep Offspring - '97 MPV Allsport 2wd
90 day: 19.05 mpg (US)

Geeeoooh - '93 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 46.86 mpg (US)

Truckwez - '04 Dakota SLT
Thanks: 7
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Most cars don't use gas when the engine is doing the braking. The clutch pad doesn't get too much heat from friction when engine braking either. The BEST way to slow down, is EOC to stop.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 02:39 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bush AK
Posts: 55

Zuk - '88 Samurai
90 day: 18.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Agreed that best is EOC to stop. The clutch pad should not be getting any heat from friction while engine braking, as it should not be slipping (especially as it has less force on it than when under heavy acceleration)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 03:13 PM   #8 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 4,428

Cara's Work Log - '00 Caravan
90 day: 28.21 mpg (US)

Cara - '00 Caravan Base
90 day: 29.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 70 Times in 63 Posts
Engine braking is better than using your brakes because your engine doesn't turn into dust.

There is a huge problem with brake dust on roads in California, because people think they should stomp on the gas, then stomp on the brake just as hard, instead of attempting to smoothly flow through traffic. It leaves brake dust on the roads, which in turn gets washed into water sources, asbestos and all. (Not that newer pads have asbestos in them, I don't think.)
__________________


"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
Because bean counters always win, that's why.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 11:08 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Arragonis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 26

Helga - '05 Fabia VRS
90 day: 42.71 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyatt View Post
Yes, but the engine turning is slowing your vehicle down... so it is better than using your breakpads to slow down, but you don't coast as long as if you were coasting in gear.
The trade-off can be difficult to calculate though. If I coast in gear then I use no fuel and with long gearing (30mph / 1000rpm - 6sp Diesel) I can coast for a long time and my MPG reads at infinity. If I coast out of gear I can go slightly further but then engine is burning fuel to keep going and MPG depends on speed, can be between 40-65.

I'm interested in working out whether its better to accelerate more strongly uphill that try to cruise for longer at a lower throttle, and also whether its better to be in a lower gear (less effort but more RPM) vs a higher one. My experimentation so far has not been conclusive.

(All figures Imperial)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 02:18 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 515
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
If you're braking in neutral, the engine is idling and burning gas.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Restore oil additive... suspectnumber961 Success Stories 11 09-02-2009 01:05 PM
Engine braking and stop lights Piwoslaw Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 23 08-12-2009 12:02 AM
Engine braking without using fuel idea Dane-ger EcoModding Central 35 06-26-2009 03:17 AM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 12:38 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com