Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

View Poll Results: IS this to extream
Yes, your one crazy person 23 85.19%
no, looks great 4 14.81%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-30-2008, 03:17 AM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Minded
 
Chris D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 667

Lunar Mist - '02 Toyota Tacoma SR5
90 day: 25.31 mpg (US)

Silver Streak - '08 Toyota Corolla S
90 day: 38.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 25 Times in 12 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Chris D.
Looks like a kit car, I dig it! just dont go into steep driveways

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-30-2008, 05:21 AM   #12 (permalink)
Certified Freak
 
Greenblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 120

Greenblazer's Taco - '07 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner Double Cab SR5 V6 4.0Liter
90 day: 24.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am not an aerodynamic expert, but I agree that your tail is too long, and not sharp enough. The flat part in the rear is bad from an aerodynamic standpoint. I would suggest you follow the stock hatch line and curve the bottom up to meet it in a sharper point. Take a look at the Aptera's tail for some inspiration.

Later,

Allan Greenblazer
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 06:25 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 25

Fortuga - '03 Subaru Forester X
90 day: 21.68 mpg (US)

The Beater - '94 Nissan Sentra EX
90 day: 28.88 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I trimmed your nose, rear and back roof (no more tall passengers) to what I believe to be a more reasonable shape that will still give you the benefit while allowing you to park better. I think it is more practical this way, even though you may not be squeezing every last drop of FE out of it.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 09:07 AM   #14 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
I think that tail ^ is a bit short / steep. You might get flow separation somewhere along the way. I'd go with something in between the two.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 10:00 AM   #15 (permalink)
Veggiedynamics
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 684

Volt12 - '12 Chevy Volt base
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Yeah its the steepness of the tail that makes it so long.. the design I came up with was discussed by Areohead and Bajoos and I.. the profile i have there matches his profile but is extended to lessen the wake at the flat tail... less flat tail = less for a wake to form
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 10:08 AM   #16 (permalink)
Veggiedynamics
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 684

Volt12 - '12 Chevy Volt base
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JV-Tuga View Post
I trimmed your nose, rear and back roof (no more tall passengers) to what I believe to be a more reasonable shape that will still give you the benefit while allowing you to park better. I think it is more practical this way, even though you may not be squeezing every last drop of FE out of it.
practicality isn't a major concern, the nose thats already built as shown and on the car has not given me any problems with parking or entering driveways ect.

My main goal is if I'm going to go through the effort to make a tail it might as well be the best I can make... no compromises.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 10:28 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
ttoyoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: boston ma
Posts: 381
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

My main goal is if I'm going to go through the effort to make a tail it might as well be the best I can make... no compromises.

In that case copy the tail of the m-111 record car. Put casters under it. They probably had *some* idea what they were doing, and they did not cut corners to save money, they made this car for prestige.
Just be aware the car may tend to turn into crosswinds on the road.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 10:30 AM   #18 (permalink)
Veggiedynamics
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 684

Volt12 - '12 Chevy Volt base
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenblazer View Post
I am not an aerodynamic expert, but I agree that your tail is too long, and not sharp enough. The flat part in the rear is bad from an aerodynamic standpoint. I would suggest you follow the stock hatch line and curve the bottom up to meet it in a sharper point. Take a look at the Aptera's tail for some inspiration.

Later,

Allan Greenblazer
The stock hatch line is to fast (steep) the air seperates from it.. no sence in making any tail for it then.. I would gain nothing
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 10:33 AM   #19 (permalink)
Veggiedynamics
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 684

Volt12 - '12 Chevy Volt base
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttoyoda View Post

My main goal is if I'm going to go through the effort to make a tail it might as well be the best I can make... no compromises.

In that case copy the tail of the m-111 record car. Put casters under it. They probably had *some* idea what they were doing, and they did not cut corners to save money, they made this car for prestige.
Just be aware the car may tend to turn into crosswinds on the road.
yeah.. that may be bad.... I however am not running at 100+ mph like the 111.. no need for a shark fin on the back..
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 10:58 AM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
ttoyoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: boston ma
Posts: 381
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
For computational fluid dynamics modeling :
http://www.fluent.com/solutions/automotive/aero.htm
Big money unless you get it free at school. Not the eaisest to learn. Pitfalls for the unskeptical, i.e. you make an error in setting up the model or test conditions (true for any modeling software) you might get wrong answers and not realize it. I used to use it years ago, to model air flow thru heat sinks and air distribution ducts, and it was easy to spend weeks making models, running the simulation, interpreting the results. In the end, the PCB layout guys put components where THEY wanted, and we would make ducts and heatsinks so the product would not catch fire.
If you have no training in modeling with it, it will take you less time and you will have more fun just making the real thing. If you have the software free and someone can show you how to use it, then make models.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ben Nelson's Electro-Metro Build thread bennelson Fossil Fuel Free 1499 12-22-2019 07:24 PM
Gravity racer gallery - extreme aerodynamics trebuchet03 Aerodynamics 37 12-14-2010 05:04 PM
Extreme Vibe experiment trikkonceptz EcoModding Central 4 05-20-2008 11:50 PM
Extreme Idea 'IMA' for almost any car? landspeed EcoModding Central 6 04-03-2008 01:56 AM
AFS Trinity EXTREME Hybrids!!! cfg83 General Efficiency Discussion 10 01-18-2008 07:15 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com