Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-04-2008, 10:53 PM   #11 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,659

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 78.84 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 106.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 71 Times in 49 Posts
I had an '89 Accord and could hear the difference in airflow with the lights popped up.

It's worth mentioning that the mpg hit from the pop up lights up also includes the additional electrical load. So it won't translate exactly to a 4 mpg savings by going to the flush mounts - but it's going to be better than before.

Nice work!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 01:27 AM   #12 (permalink)
What? THIS IS MY GOOD CAR
 
justpassntime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 285

The Japillac - '87 Accord LXi Sedan
90 day: 31.77 mpg (US)

Ranchero GT - '73 Ranchero GT

Spaz - '83 S10 4X4 Tahoe
90 day: 27.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to justpassntime
Thanks for the compliments. I am going to start working nights. I will post the difference in night vs day mileage next week.
__________________
Honda...the economical, renewable resource.


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 01:55 AM   #13 (permalink)
Old Retired R&D Dude
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woburn Mass USA
Posts: 397

Transporter - '09 Escape XLS
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
I had an '89 Accord and could hear the difference in airflow with the lights popped up.

It's worth mentioning that the mpg hit from the pop up lights up also includes the additional electrical load. So it won't translate exactly to a 4 mpg savings by going to the flush mounts - but it's going to be better than before.

Nice work!
The power being used by the lamps does eat up some power/HP,
but even if the lights weren't on, I could still feel the heavy drag on my 1991 Laser RS when I hit the Flip-up button.

And, when I was zooming along with them already flipped up, and switched on the power to the lamps,
I really didn't feel much of a drag, if any at all..

What is 200W translated into HP?
__________________
Cheers,
Rich
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 07:41 AM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 138
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi Xringer,

200/749 is .267 HP
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 09:30 AM   #15 (permalink)
Harebrained Idea Skeptic
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 168

The White Car - '84 300td
90 day: 28.84 mpg (US)

The Blue Car - '86 535i
Last 3: 23.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by justpassntime View Post
I have had cars before that if the high beams were on the lows were too, I thought they were all that way.
What many folks don't understand is that those "low" beams are actually low/high beams with dual filaments. Thus, while your "low" beam headlights were on with the highs, they were on high beam, not low beam. The headlights you installed and many new headlights only have a single filament per headlight.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 10:22 AM   #16 (permalink)
Old Retired R&D Dude
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woburn Mass USA
Posts: 397

Transporter - '09 Escape XLS
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by donee View Post
Hi Xringer,

200/749 is .267 HP
Dang!! Seems like those rap guys with the 800 watt subwoofers are wasting
a considerable amount of gas while annoying everyone in the neighborhood..

Heck, the power going to my high beams could power an E-Bike for miles!!
__________________
Cheers,
Rich
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 03:36 AM   #17 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 4,446

Cara - '00 Caravan Base
90 day: 28.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 148
Thanked 72 Times in 64 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn D. View Post
What many folks don't understand is that those "low" beams are actually low/high beams with dual filaments. Thus, while your "low" beam headlights were on with the highs, they were on high beam, not low beam. The headlights you installed and many new headlights only have a single filament per headlight.
I know this thread is old, but I'm sure since it's linked on the mods thread, people see it, and this quote, which is not wholly correct.

Dual filament bulbs turn off one filament in favor of the other, so only one at a time is on. If they were wired correctly, both could be used, but the heat would destroy them quickly. This is most common with sealed beam single-headlight (per side) designs.

Now, Look at EF/ED Honda Civics (These I know for sure). They're Two-bulb composites (per side).

When you turn the headlights to low beam, the low beams come on. When you turn the headlights to hi-beam, the lows stay on, and the highs come on. Thus, 4 headlight setup, all working at the same time. These bulbs are 9005/9006, by the way, so they're not dual filament bulbs.

While one could argue that this is inefficient, removing the wiring and such to stop this action, and make only the highs come on when the highs are on, and only have the lows on when it's the selection, would ultimately be a waste of time. The physical energy would be better spent utilizing some other method than attempting to gain .1 HP of efficiency loss.

Verdict: Wiring all four headlights to work at the same time in tandem while in hi-beam mode is safer due to added lighted area, and saying that it's a waste of efficiency is simply splitting hairs to find a reason to say someone else was wrong.

BTW, OP, nice job on the hood... looks spiffy as a clean unit. Don't forget to remove the motors and frames under those buckets... extra weight
__________________


"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
Because bean counters always win, that's why.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2008, 02:21 AM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Minded
 
Chris D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brooklyn Park, MN
Posts: 615

Lunar Mist - '02 Tacoma SR5
90 day: 25.31 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Chris D.
that looks pretty trick, like it came that way from the factory..
gives the front end a more agressive look if ya ask me..
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 10:04 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
LarryClapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3

eco-rod - '86 Accord LXi
90 day: 35.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I need to do this to mine. How long did this take to do?
Four more mpg, would be nice. I would bet side mirrors are costing us the same mileage as lights.
__________________

Last edited by LarryClapp; 03-15-2009 at 10:18 PM.. Reason: Adding to it.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Tags
fender skirts

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1989 crx si fender skirts crexcrex Aerodynamics 26 07-18-2008 04:06 AM
87 Accord LXi Mods justpassntime EcoModding Central 0 06-28-2008 03:05 AM
Considering fender skirts Johnny Mullet Aerodynamics 7 05-17-2008 11:01 PM
Addition of low profile rear spolier- Toyota Corolla TimboliahPantsOnFiyah Aerodynamics 2 04-22-2008 10:18 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com