Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-28-2013, 04:21 PM   #31 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
http://ecomodder.com/forum/353369-post604.html

__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-28-2013)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-28-2013, 05:32 PM   #32 (permalink)
.
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Salt Lake valley Utah
Posts: 923
Thanks: 114
Thanked 397 Times in 224 Posts
Go to the "65 efficiency mods" link in the top of the page. There are many things there that are already proven to increase 1-3mpg or far more. Take any of those mods and make a product out of it. Well even help you improve that product! And if it's well made at a good price that justifies the return investment in less fuel costs, some of us here would even be happy to buy it.

A lot of people here don't have the skills or resources to make something like a kammback with the fit or finish that would pass the "wife approval test." Some people want more mpg, but care to much about what other people think about them to tape cardboard and coroplast to their cars. If you made a molded plastic kammback for example that looked oem enough, then you have a market to sell it.
__________________
I try to be helpful. I'm not an expert.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 06:42 PM   #33 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
6 mpg

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBld View Post
From the front license plate I added two arms extending out to a piece of angle iron estimating what I thought would be the best deflection of the air by the "arrow" (side view) of the angle iron rail. After various tests I landed on a setting that averaged in my 2005 Kia Rio (stick) a 6mpg increase!
My Kia is long gone. I no longer do the long driving route. I test our Ford Focus when possible, with various materials, shapes, angles and placements. ***You who thrive in this ecomodder atmosphere could be a lot of help!***
A friend who is a metalwork craftsman is helping manufacture the blade. It is aluminum and mounts off the front license plate (at least on the Rio, Focus, Prius and other models we are testing). We call it the GasBlade.
Would love to hear what you think. Could see about making my units accessible (with permission already from the administrator here at ecomodder). Am trying to add pics (as attachments... hope it works). Pics and video clips are accessible at a crowdfunding site if you would like to view the gallery there (again, this is with permission from admin). GasBladePatent | Indiegogo
Perhaps you finally released the parking brake,as your mileage improvement is not attributable to the 'GasBlade'.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 07:25 PM   #34 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
christofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 292

00C - '00 Toyota Corolla
90 day: 43.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 147
Thanked 190 Times in 73 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by plasticuser View Post
What happens when that device hits a small child that runs in the road?
BTW, this device most likely renders the car unregisterable where I live.

10.B.1
a. REJECT when:
1) Bumpers are not 4.5 inches in vertical height.
2) Bumpers do not extend to the entire width of original body
wheel track.
3) Bumpers are missing, improperly attached, broken, or have
portions protruding which create a hazard.

4) Bumpers are not made from a material that is strong enough
to effectively transfer impact.
http://publicsafety.utah.gov/safetyi...T%20Manual.pdf
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 08:22 PM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carson City, Nevada
Posts: 612

Jimmy - '00 GMC Jimmy SLT
90 day: 21.18 mpg (US)

The White Gnat - '99 Suzuki Swift
Team Suzuki
90 day: 51.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 114 Times in 90 Posts
If the car were supersonic, something like that might potentially cause a shock wave to start ahead of the car and miss the rest of the body. I can see that *mayyybeeee* reducing drag. But at the extremely low subsonic speeds we drive at, I'd be shocked & stunned if it was proven to actually work.

It shows a thought process in the OP that seems to be not too far off, though. I'd believe something like that quicker than I would magnetized fuel, turbulenced intake air, 2 oz. of 'snake oil' in the gas tank, or self-generated and burned hydrogen wizardry...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 10:50 PM   #36 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
It's not very "sexy"- needs to look like a front-mounted Ram Implosion wing.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
air blade, front drag reduction, frontal area, frontal drag reduction, gasblade





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com