Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-10-2013, 12:04 AM   #1 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
fuel efficiency of vehicles has improved more than efficiency of drivers

Quote:
Cars on American roads have improved their fuel economy. The people who drive them? Not so much.

Our driving habits have collectively diminished some of the fuel-economy gains provided by advances in technology over the past four decades, says a new University of Michigan study. Automakers have increased the fuel efficiency of the nation's fleet by 40 percent since 1970. But there's been a net gain in collective fuel efficiency of only 17 percent over the same timeframe.

Here's why: More than ever, Americans like driving alone. In 1970, there were an average of 1.9 people per vehicle. In 2010, the average was 1.38.

"We increasingly value the flexibility of going where we want and when we want, despite the incremental cost of gasoline, says Michael Sivak, the study's author. "Clearly, we would save a lot of gasoline if we would car pool more, but that comes at a cost of flexibility."

Fewer people per car means more people driving their own cars, each using their own gasoline and thus decreasing the country's net efficiency. The shift has come at a time when the cost of gasoline has comparatively skyrocketed from an average of 36 cents per gallon in 1970 to $2.79 in 2010, according to the study.

Sivak, the director of the Sustainable Worldwide Transportation consortium within the university's Transportation Research Institute, culled his data from research statistics kept by the U.S. Department of Transportation.

He says another reason why the country's efficiency increases haven't matched that of automakers is that even as drivers are more conscious of their fuel economy, they tend to drive more as they increase their fuel savings. So in the end, they don't save as much on gas costs as they think.

"If you look at a large group of people who have bought new cars, they tend to drive more," he said.

Some more numbers from Sivak's study, which you can find in its entirety here:

- The distance U.S. vehicles have traveled increased 155 percent between 1970 and 2010.

- Because of the drop in people per vehicle, the corresponding increase in distance occupants have traveled is only 84 percent.

- In the same timeframe, the country consumed 53 percent more fuel, going from 303,333 million liters in 1970 to 463,233 million in 2010.
autos.aol.com/article/fuel-efficiency-econony-gas-michigan-study/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl31%7Csec3_lnk2%26pLid%3D281707

Re: solo drivers: I knew my eyes weren't lying to me.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
nemo (03-10-2013), niky (03-10-2013), Piwoslaw (03-10-2013), Ryland (03-10-2013), War_Wagon (03-10-2013)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-10-2013, 12:26 AM   #2 (permalink)
5 Gears of Fury
 
War_Wagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,230

Spunky - '90 Honda Civic CX
90 day: 35.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 175
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
A goldfish will grow to the size that it's environment will support. I guess the same applies to people - "Wow I saved $100 on gas this month with my new car, I'd better drive it a lot more to make it worth it" ha ha. When I was in university I hauled 4 other people with me to campus everyday in my '64 Bel Air. Sadly since then, I haven't worked anywhere that I could rideshare with other employees.
__________________
"Don't look for one place to lose 100 pounds, look for 1600 places to lose an ounce." - Tony DeFeo
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 03:16 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carson City, Nevada
Posts: 612

Jimmy - '00 GMC Jimmy SLT
90 day: 21.18 mpg (US)

The White Gnat - '99 Suzuki Swift
Team Suzuki
90 day: 51.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 114 Times in 90 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by War_Wagon View Post
A goldfish will grow to the size that it's environment will support.
Did anyone see the article about the 18" long (about 1/2 meter) goldfish they're finding in Lake Tahoe? Seems people have been dumping their aquariums into the lake, and now these goldfish are becoming MONSTERS. HAH!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 05:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,631

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 702 Times in 445 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
The good news is that obesity has doubled since the 70's. This means that fuel efficiency measured in tonne-miles per gallon, has gone up more!
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 09:07 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
nemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,015

Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix
90 day: 26.7 mpg (US)

SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts
In 1970 there were approximately 49 million men and 30 million women employed. In 2009 the number rises to 74 men and 55 million women. A substantial increase in the number of employed people. That is a lot of commute miles increase.


Reference
Table 2. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years and over by sex, 1970-2009 annual averages

Last edited by nemo; 03-10-2013 at 12:12 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 01:42 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nemo View Post
That is a lot of commute miles increase.
True, but OTOH it's a heck of a lot easier to telecommute these days :-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 05:37 PM   #7 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
If I may, let me paraphrase Frank Lee's central theme:

"...over the years the CARS have gotten SMARTER while the DRIVERS have (seemingly) gotten DUMBER..."

Last edited by gone-ot; 03-10-2013 at 09:00 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 08:54 PM   #8 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,625 Times in 1,450 Posts
Lots of people who can't drive a stickshift (mainly because they don't want to learn it), just rely on the ABS and then don't care about braking efficiently, among other poor driving skills...
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 11:06 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 21

Smokingwheels - '84 Nissan Bluebird wagon LX
90 day: 35.99 mpg (US)

Red Z - '79 Nissan 280 ZX

Blue Ford - '95 Ford Falcon GLI
90 day: 18.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via MSN to Smokingwheels Send a message via Yahoo to Smokingwheels
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Lots of people who can't drive a stickshift (mainly because they don't want to learn it), just rely on the ABS and then don't care about braking efficiently, among other poor driving skills...
The bit about ABS.. and they don't look behind themselves before applying them either. I had to take evasive action in my old car once in order not to run into the back of them.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com