Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadgetman
I can't help but get a giggle over your comment!
Calling my customers my "Posse"! You know, it may be a little funny, but it's also kind of true! No one believes as much as I, except maybe for those who have experienced the modification first hand.
This is where I get a little annoyed at the posts here (and other places) where the posts are all about conjecture and hypothesis that contradicts the evidence at hand.
With so many positive reports, how is is that an individual can say they are all untrue?
How can any person justify denying the evidence, usually couched in terms approaching slander of the individual presenting the evidence?
What happened to the good old days, when researchers actually researched, rather than condemn the individual who comes with something new?
Well, thank you for the little chuckle.
For those of you not swayed by the negative opinions of those who have no experience with this technology, then feel free to hear what my clients have to say at [***]
My name is Ron Hatton.
I AM responsible.
|
Ron,
you said"
With so many positive reports, how is is that an individual can say they are all untrue
Do you remember Hitler and the Nazis? They said they didn't burn up any jews and a lot of people still believe them....to this day.
Your logic is replaced with blind passion. While I admire passion, I am saddened when it is blind.
How simple to simply follow accepted forms of testing and silience us.
