Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register
Now


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-13-2008, 09:56 AM   #1 (permalink)
Old Retired R&D Dude
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woburn Mass USA
Posts: 318

CRV99 - '99 CRV LX
90 day: 26.38 mpg (US)
Hatch Wing on 2009 Toyota Matrix


http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/.../photo_01.html


Is this little rear wing going to help or hurt the cd?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Cheers,
Rich

1999 Honda CRV LX 5 speed stick
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 10:20 AM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 1,668

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
90 day: 45.63 mpg (US)

Daox's Matrix - '03 Matrix
90 day: 38.15 mpg (US)
It looks like the spoiler is higher than the roof. If this is the case then it is bad for aero.

If you look at the 03-07 Matrix you can see that the spoiler on it follows and extends the taper of the roof line. That type of spoiler helps aero.
__________________
EcoRenovator.org - Efficient living and green home improvement
Matrix Build Thread
Paseo Build Thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 11:00 AM   #3 (permalink)
Purveyor of Swedish steel
 
SL8Brick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
If you look at the 03-07 Matrix you can see that the spoiler on it follows and extends the taper of the roof line. That type of spoiler helps aero.
Very true, but this one is aweful for FE:

__________________
1993 Volvo 240 Wagon - 2.3ltr SOHC/Automatic - 279k miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 01:43 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Auburn, NH
Posts: 421

Wicked Wanda - '99 Beetle GLS
90 day: 30.08 mpg (US)

Green Monster - '99 Explorer Sport
90 day: 16.99 mpg (US)

Dad's Taxi - '99 Odyssey EX
90 day: 24.23 mpg (US)
The hatch on the new Matrix is more sloped than previous years. A spoiler like this probably helps since it break the airflow away from the body in a straighter line. That usually helps Cd.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 01:47 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin
Posts: 61

Silver Bullet - '03 Protege LX
90 day: 39.42 mpg (US)
hurt
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2008, 02:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
Weight Reduction
 
ankit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 303

4x4 - '06 Altima 2.5 Special Edition
90 day: 29.04 mpg (US)

Mom's Van - '99 Voyager SE
90 day: 25.62 mpg (US)
Send a message via AIM to ankit
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2003protege View Post
hurt
It would probably help if the spoiler was slightly modified so that its angle would slope downward as the same angle of the rooftop.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 01:56 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 808
upswept rear wing

Hurt.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 03:05 PM   #8 (permalink)
Old Retired R&D Dude
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woburn Mass USA
Posts: 318

CRV99 - '99 CRV LX
90 day: 26.38 mpg (US)
So far, the 'Hurt' vote seems to indicate that Toyota made a mistake on this one.

To this total novice aero DIYer, that looks like a wing for putting down pressure on the rear wheels. At the cost of a lot of drag.

edit:
Good news. I checked their site, and the "Hatch-mounted roof end spoiler" is not standard on the less expensive versions..
__________________
Cheers,
Rich

1999 Honda CRV LX 5 speed stick

Last edited by Xringer; 06-14-2008 at 03:18 PM. Reason: Adding one line of text..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 03:24 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 808
drag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xringer View Post
So far, the 'Hurt' vote seems to indicate that Toyota made a mistake on this one.

To this total novice aero DIYer, that looks like a wing for putting down pressure on the rear wheels. At the cost of a lot of drag.

edit:
Good news. I checked their site, and the "Hatch-mounted roof end spoiler" is not standard on the less expensive versions..
The Matrix body type does not generate lift.So since the up-kick on the wing would generate downforce,that type of wing becomes a solution for a problem the Matrix doesn't have.My guess is that it's a "Rally-inspired" concession to styling.If they make one ( as others have mentioned already ) that follows the original roof and side contour,that would be the one to go with.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 05:04 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Auburn, NH
Posts: 421

Wicked Wanda - '99 Beetle GLS
90 day: 30.08 mpg (US)

Green Monster - '99 Explorer Sport
90 day: 16.99 mpg (US)

Dad's Taxi - '99 Odyssey EX
90 day: 24.23 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
The Matrix body type does not generate lift.So since the up-kick on the wing would generate downforce,that type of wing becomes a solution for a problem the Matrix doesn't have.My guess is that it's a "Rally-inspired" concession to styling.If they make one ( as others have mentioned already ) that follows the original roof and side contour,that would be the one to go with.
How do you know for sure it doesn't generate any lift? The profile resembles a wing shape to me. Anyway, the problem here is the perspective of the photo. It's shot from ground level giving the appearance that the spoiler tilts up. The rear edge actually winds up horizontal, or parallel to the road surface; which is what you want when breaking airflow away from the body to reduce drag.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008, 11:33 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master of None
 
thirdman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9
according to my ever-so-questionable research, it will hurt:





  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2008, 11:40 PM   #12 (permalink)
Old Retired R&D Dude
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woburn Mass USA
Posts: 318

CRV99 - '99 CRV LX
90 day: 26.38 mpg (US)
That third image seems to show a better cd with a little flat wing sitting out
about 5 or 6 inches behind the top.. What's up with that?
__________________
Cheers,
Rich

1999 Honda CRV LX 5 speed stick
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2008, 11:38 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 36

SaturnSl1 - '00 SL1
90 day: 40.21 mpg (US)

MyPickup - '96 Ranger

CRX HF - '89 CRX HF
90 day: 51.59 mpg (US)
Project for somebody with a little more time and know how than me....

Using the aerodynamic program recently discovered, can somebody sketch a typical sedan and then put a short wing angled down at a nice tear-drop shape.

I'm wondering if I can have a portion of the results that a boat-tail would give while only having a very small wing where the roof line ends.

Taking a guess, I would think it would only help some, but it may be enough to make it worthwhile.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2008, 08:48 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 100
Hi All,

Look over the driver on the new Matrix. The roof peaks, and then is downhill towards the aft. So, the thirdman model is incorrect, and not predictive.

The downhill section is going to impart downward movement to the air. If they did not have that extension, flow would seperate in front of the rear of the car a little bit. That the extension is for, to keep the flow from sepearting.

The tip of the spoiler is higher than the lowest portion of the roof. But well below the height of the roof over the driver.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 12:18 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master of None
 
thirdman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9
My model is for a Ford Festiva, and I just posted it as an example.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 11:40 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
gascort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 200

Gascort - '93 Escort Wagon
90 day: 40.5 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raysp30 View Post
Project for somebody with a little more time and know how than me....

Using the aerodynamic program recently discovered, can somebody sketch a typical sedan and then put a short wing angled down at a nice tear-drop shape.

I'm wondering if I can have a portion of the results that a boat-tail would give while only having a very small wing where the roof line ends.

Taking a guess, I would think it would only help some, but it may be enough to make it worthwhile.
You're talking about a Kammback. If you already don't know what they are, do a search about them on here, and look at MetroMPG's current project: making a permanent Kammback extension...
__________________
"You laugh now at my recycled materials-ecomodded car. I laugh later when I see you at the fuel pump!"
The day will come (soon) when a Geo is worth more than a Hummer, except for scrap metal. http://www.scientificmethodfueleconomy.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 11:11 AM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 36

SaturnSl1 - '00 SL1
90 day: 40.21 mpg (US)

MyPickup - '96 Ranger

CRX HF - '89 CRX HF
90 day: 51.59 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gascort View Post
You're talking about a Kammback. If you already don't know what they are, do a search about them on here, and look at MetroMPG's current project: making a permanent Kammback extension...
Not quite. I'm talking about a Kammback that is only 2-3 inches long.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 01:39 AM   #18 (permalink)
Sequential
 
Concrete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kansas
Posts: 129

The Truck - '00 S10 Extended Cab
90 day: 24.24 mpg (US)
Not so fast

I think thirdman is onto something

in the first half this infomercial they show a back view of this concept SAAB
looks like it has active spoilers that extend behind the hatch and under the bumper - but they seem to indicate they are for low drag - "10% reduction"

not unlike what thirdman has shown



and I am very interested in the thirdman concept for my truck cab
but expect it may be a very tricky to get it just right
and if it is not right I'm sure it would increase drag
a Kamm back may just be more practical for those of us that don't have wind tunnels

BTW
justpassntime is building a short Kamm back - similar to matrix wing
he says it will be somewhat adjustable during development
could shed some light on this topic to have some real world data
Are there any magic numbers?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 06:59 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 808
lift

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperTrooper View Post
How do you know for sure it doesn't generate any lift? The profile resembles a wing shape to me. Anyway, the problem here is the perspective of the photo. It's shot from ground level giving the appearance that the spoiler tilts up. The rear edge actually winds up horizontal, or parallel to the road surface; which is what you want when breaking airflow away from the body to reduce drag.
I'm given to understand that van and wagon style bodies do not generate the kind of lift that would be found in a fastback or notchback body style.The explanation given, is that the way the air mass is distributed for vans and wagons,yields essentially the same air velocity above the body,as it is alongside.Without the velocity differential,there cannot exist a pressure differential which would induce the lift.Sure,the matrix does have some roof camber,and it occurs directly over the driver's head,and there is some lift associated with deformation of the streamlines,but at normal highway speeds,this would present no challenge to stability,especially something which could be cured by something at the far end of the roof.And actually,if the air could continue rearward,at its defined slope,it would achieve atmospheric pressure at a distance,1.78 times the body height,behind the point of maximum camber.If the hatch wing tilts up,it blasts the airstream into turbulence which cannot recover it's kinetic energy into static pressure,and you're left with higher drag.Air needs about 3.5 more time to decelelerate without separation,than the time it can withstand during acceleration from rest.The long progressively increasing curvature roofline,with no interruptions,provides that gentle deceleration ramp the air needs to reach equilibrium pressure.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2003 Toyota Matrix Block Heater Daox EcoModding Central 17 11-28-2008 01:33 PM
Review: 2009 Toyota Corolla LE (37.9 MPG) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 23 11-13-2008 12:45 AM
2008 Pontiac Vibe (Record Results) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 15 03-07-2008 11:59 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
All content copyright EcoModder.com