01-10-2011, 10:42 AM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 3,940
Thanks: 513
Thanked 501 Times in 306 Posts
|
A whole 78 years?! Let's see if we can use it up faster!!!
|
|
|
|
01-10-2011, 11:22 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 45
Thanks: 25
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Sure there could be TONS of oil out there, but considering exploding demand and the increasing cost of extraction per barrel it's getting increasingly uneconomical... Fun times we're living in eh?
__________________
Slowly modding my 2000 sonata to what it should be... one project at a time.
|
|
|
|
01-10-2011, 11:25 AM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
I are aerodynamic kitteh!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 625
Thanks: 219
Thanked 150 Times in 86 Posts
|
I dunno... It became economical to extract oil from shale back in 2007.
We are talking about 400,000,000,000 barrels of oil. At $90 per barrel, that's about $36,000 TRILLION dollars. If it were taxed at 10%, that's enough to pay off the national debt completely, I think.
|
|
|
|
01-10-2011, 12:37 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
|
The thread is starting to remind me of when drilling ANWR was all the rage. The SUV/righty tighty crowd thought that sinking some pipes in there would allow them to drive all over creation for the rest of their lives at 97 cents/gallon. Then I rained on their parade with the best available estimates of the size of the reserves vs. U.S. consumption.
|
|
|
|
01-10-2011, 01:26 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 108 Times in 80 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
Oil is finite. By definition, there is a peak.
We passed worldwide oil discovery in 1965 or 1966. The fact that we are even considering using the so-called oil sands is proof that we are getting a little desperate...
Meanwhile, the BP oil pipeline in Alaska was leaking, again:
Congress Investigates Alaska BP Pipeline Leak : NPR
|
As usual Neil, the professional activist, is running his mouth and displaying his ignorance. The last time we heard this "we are running out of oil" nonsense was in the 1970's; the Leftist activists began crying that 'the sky is falling!' - just as they are doing again now.
"Peak oil is often confused with oil depletion; peak oil is the point of maximum production while depletion refers to a period of falling reserves and supply."
I would suggest everyone read this link rather than get their information from a biased cartoon video:
Peak oil - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As expected, Neil would like to give the phrase a different meaning to keep you ignorant and promote his ideology.
|
|
|
|
01-10-2011, 01:30 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thymeclock
As usual Neil, the professional activist, is running his mouth and displaying his ignorance. The last time we heard this "we are running out of oil" nonsense was in the 1970's; the Leftist activists began crying that 'the sky is falling!' - just as they are doing again now.
"Peak oil is often confused with oil depletion; peak oil is the point of maximum production while depletion refers to a period of falling reserves and supply."
I would suggest everyone read this link rather than get their information from a biased cartoon video:
Peak oil - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As expected, Neil would like to give the phrase a different meaning to keep you ignorant and promote his ideology.
|
I'd say you crossed the line into personal attacks.
|
|
|
|
01-10-2011, 01:37 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
I are aerodynamic kitteh!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 625
Thanks: 219
Thanked 150 Times in 86 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
I'd say you crossed the line into personal attacks.
|
Remember, thymeclock, it's never okay to directly describe somebody negatively.
However, you can imply it all you want, because that's okay. "FauxNoise," anyone?
|
|
|
|
01-10-2011, 01:39 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
|
Is Fauxnoise a person posting here? 
|
|
|
|
01-10-2011, 01:40 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
|
...kick the **** out of the facts and figures all you want, but please "no shooting" of the messengers!
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Old Tele man For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-10-2011, 02:01 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,533
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,019 Times in 568 Posts
|
I'll echo that - no getting personal please.
And I'll bet a unicorn's tear duct that nothing useful will come of this thread. And so with the lightning reflexes of an OPEC minister adjusting production output... thread locked!
Hey, here's an idea... Let's talk about improving vehicle efficiency (or driving efficiency) instead of politics!
EDIT...
PS., arragonis, this authoritarian forum admin thanks you for the chuckle
Quote:
|
Unfortunately my boss (who plays online poker at work) has decided to cut off You-tube
|
|
|
|
|
|