Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-10-2016, 05:55 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 64
Thanks: 9
Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
Thumbs up BEST + CORRECT Aerodynamic Streamlining Template

Which is the best aero of all and correct Old VS. New

Tesla vs. Old






old....












best of + correct Template all....

Thanks for help...


Last edited by slipknotsv; 04-10-2016 at 07:08 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-10-2016, 12:46 PM   #2 (permalink)
Eco Dabbler
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 45
Thanks: 33
Thanked 33 Times in 19 Posts
It's a good question. I like the concept of superimposing these shapes over photos, but it's a bit misleading in some respects.

There is no "best" shape for all vehicles. The blunter one would be better for a little lower speed. I have no idea what speed that is compared to the Tesla version, but that's the direction. The faster you go (within limits), the longer the aspect ratio to be optimum. Also, as we superimpose the shape it counter-assumes the vehicle purpose. Some vehicles just need to be taller or longer to fill their function.

Finally, beware of the 2d limitations in thinking when viewing shapes like these. Sides of the vehicle are just as important -and ground effect too.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ByDesign For This Useful Post:
ChazInMT (04-11-2016)
Old 04-10-2016, 06:30 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
ByDesign has correctly summarized the tyranny of Thee Holy Template.

Quote:
Tesla vs. Old
[citation needed]
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 02:49 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 64
Thanks: 9
Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
best template is ..........? from these? Recommendations and most accurate.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 08:37 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ByDesign View Post
Finally, beware of the 2d limitations in thinking when viewing shapes like these. Sides of the vehicle are just as important -and ground effect too.
Yes, true - true - true.

One thing I've noticed in many of the wind-tunnel videos I've watched is that the stream of smoke which actually manages to go over the roof seems limited to one 4-inch wide spot dead center on the upper lip of the front grille.

A notable amount of the smoke coming out of the wand/probe goes off the top of the side windows and an alarming amount get blasted at the side view mirror area with just slight off-center locations.

Going back to the plan view importance; based on the smoke tunnel videos it appears that just about 1/4 the air mass, 1/8th each front corner runs along the lower sides of the vehicle.

Makes sense if we allocate the air pattern as seen in the attached marked-up (by me) photo.

MORE random pics...... - Page 3858 - Pelican Parts Technical BBS
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 08:46 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
In the watermelon image posted I can visualize the car in the melon.

I can see very little air going over the center-line, and all that air hitting the mirrors at the quarter-line.

I can see the top of the side windows being the point where a battle to equalize air flow pressures ensues.

I can see a small amount of air going along the sides.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 10:09 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aardvarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Evensville, TN
Posts: 676

Deep Blue - '94 GMC Suburban K2500 SLE
90 day: 23.75 mpg (US)

Griffin (T4R) - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5
90 day: 25.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 237
Thanked 580 Times in 322 Posts
Doing some overlays in the past, I noted that several low drag Toyota cars fit AST-2 pretty well. Honestly the difference between the two templates mentioned is so slight, I am not sure how you would pull off building one versus the other without specialized equipment.

As others have mentioned the AST-2 side overlay template is just a starting point in one dimension, however it is a really good starting point for those of us who wouldn’t have a clue were to start without it.

The hard part is actually going out and building something. It really doesn’t take that much creativity to start with a 2D view/print and figure out a decent (but non ideal) 3D shape that will work for your vehicle and your intended purpose. Personally, I am shooting for a shape that is “not as terrible as it used to be” which is within the realm of my abilities (I hope) and tools (as I am presently wind tunnel deficient). Actually implementing that by building something is where the work is.

There is a top overlay and rear view of the AST-2 vehicle that have also been posted, which with a bit of imagination describe the AST-2 “vehicle” in full 3D. It is probably "too ideal" for direct implementation on typical boxy vehicles.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aardvarcus For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-09-2016), redpoint5 (04-11-2016)
Old 04-11-2016, 11:18 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 64
Thanks: 9
Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
best Template AST-2........ ?

We wait for statement Aerohead.....

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2016, 11:47 AM   #9 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
There are some horrendous looking, lumpy vehicles (aerocivic, illuminati seven) that claim ridiculously low Cd so perhaps strict adherence to a profile is not as critical as one might think.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
aerohead (05-09-2016)
Old 04-11-2016, 12:58 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 64
Thanks: 9
Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
next........


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
aerodinamics, best aerodinamic, template

Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com