Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-05-2009, 01:33 PM   #31 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 4,438

Cara's Work Log - '00 Caravan
90 day: 28.21 mpg (US)

Cara - '00 Caravan Base
90 day: 29.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 147
Thanked 70 Times in 63 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
Nothing you say makes any sense at all. But I'm sure that won't stop. Keep it up.
Odd, I understood it perfectly. Must be a redneck thing...


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________


"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
Because bean counters always win, that's why.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 01:50 PM   #32 (permalink)
Moderator
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 1,377

The Truck (Retired) - '99 A3 Jetta TDI
90 day: 62.27 mpg (US)

The Guzzler - '08 Elantra GL
90 day: 32.95 mpg (US)

The Green Machine - '00 A4 Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
Speek fer yerself, buddie!

I like the idea of brighter lights, mostly because I live/drive in rural areas. It's nice to see the deer with enough time to stop.
You just need wider beams for that, not more light. It takes very little light to notice the reflection in an animal's eyes, especially when the background is pitch black. Actually, even with more light, what would be most noticeable is still the eyes, because animals usually blend in with their environment.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 03:35 PM   #33 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 4,438

Cara's Work Log - '00 Caravan
90 day: 28.21 mpg (US)

Cara - '00 Caravan Base
90 day: 29.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 147
Thanked 70 Times in 63 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
You just need wider beams for that, not more light. It takes very little light to notice the reflection in an animal's eyes, especially when the background is pitch black. Actually, even with more light, what would be most noticeable is still the eyes, because animals usually blend in with their environment.
At 55-60 MPH on local roads, I want to see further as well.

In some cases, though, I think people confuse headlight bulb quality with headlight lamp crappiness. If the lamp is cloudy, the bulb won't make a difference. I see people with crappy lenses going and getting these $20 a bulb headlights, and expecting a major change with them... Yup - Keep spending it, buddy!
__________________


"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
Because bean counters always win, that's why.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 04:05 PM   #34 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 515
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
My Hella H9 halogen projectors.

If you can't see with these, you shouldn't be driving.

9005 halogen bulb in 20 year old 9006 factory bmw projector.

Nobody needs HIDs.

Natural sunlight.


Incandescent lamp. Very similar spectrum output to regular halogen bulb.


HID light


http://ledmuseum.home.att.net/spectra.htm

HID bulbs fool the brain into thinking that the light is brighter when in fact the narrow spectrum reduces your ability to see contrast. The worst part about HID bulbs is the glare from a wet road surface to oncoming drivers. I would have no problem if HID headlights were banned in this country.

Last edited by tjts1; 11-05-2009 at 04:10 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 02:18 PM   #35 (permalink)
for(mpg i=0;i<65;i++)cD--
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 24

Hatchy - '97 Civic DX
90 day: 43.04 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
These graphs are probably deceptive because of their normalization: the peak output of the light seems to be rescaled so that it ends up at ~4000 "intensity counts". If we consider that for a given power, an HID bulb will produce a whole lot more lumens, and in the specific situation that we're talking about, the claims are something like 2.5x the output of halogen bulbs using less power, the graph starts to smell funny.

Here's a quote from wikipedia that might shed some light (sorry) on the issue at hand:

"[...] luminous flux is adjusted to reflect the varying sensitivity of the human eye to different wavelengths of light."

and then

"The lumen can be thought of casually as a measure of the total "amount" of visible light in some defined beam or angle, or emitted from some source. The number of candelas or lumens from a source also depends on its spectrum, via the nominal response of the human eye as represented in the luminosity function."

both from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumen_(unit)

so if we made generated graphs of the different headlight options in question and did not normalize for output, they would look look very different.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 05:59 PM   #36 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 55

Deceptive - '98 Neon R/T
90 day: 43.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
christ, i try not to drive when i dont have to, but unfortunately my job is driving trash trucks. Itd be nice if the city would let us start later on foggy days, but thats just not gonna happen. Even worse is when they switched to cng, they bought cheap junk trucks. There rediculously, dangerously slow, pulling out scares the crap out of me.

Every 2 years theres usually a big pileup on the freeways, 50 cars or more.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 03:40 PM   #37 (permalink)
Ecomod noob
 
zjrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tooele, UT
Posts: 340

ZJ - '95 Grand Cherokee Laredo Upcountry
90 day: 19 mpg (US)

Neon - '03 Neon SE
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

S'Crew - '02 F150 Supercrew XLT
90 day: 18.54 mpg (US)

EX - '94 Explorer
90 day: 19.58 mpg (US)

Ranger - '90 Ranger
Last 3: 28.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I agree that more light in rural areas is a boon. As well as a wider beam. I replaced my stock Neon headlamps with some aftermarket units that have separate H7 bulbs for the projector low beam and reflector high. While a VAST improvement in both low and high, I still would like more. The projectors give a very defined cutoff that takes some getting used to. The bulbs that came with the headlamps are really crappy and give the highbeams a sort of "flashlighty" appearance. I swapped to some Osram H7s and that improved. And were still just 55W.

I still want more light, I drive in the desert...
__________________
When it comes to Heroes, RENEGADES are mine!


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2009, 01:06 AM   #38 (permalink)
wdb
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 67

Scootie - '08 Fit Sport
90 day: 37.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
You just need wider beams for that, not more light. It takes very little light to notice the reflection in an animal's eyes, especially when the background is pitch black. Actually, even with more light, what would be most noticeable is still the eyes, because animals usually blend in with their environment.
Would you please drive ahead of me on my nightly commute and make sure all the deer are looking my way? ;-)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
My Hella H9 halogen projectors.
H9's are very nice bulbs.
Quote:
HID bulbs fool the brain into thinking that the light is brighter when in fact the narrow spectrum reduces your ability to see contrast.
Having driven a very considerable number of miles in rural countrysides behind both kinds of light (HID and halogen), I agree. Halogen lit landscapes have more contrast and color.

Speaking of upgraded bulbs: anyone with 9005/HB3 or 9006/HB4 bulbs should look into. HIR 9011/9012 bulbs. They produce a tremendous amount of light at the same wattage as stockers, do not add glare to oncoming drivers, and can be popped right into stock lights with only a slight modification to the base. They're expensive but worth every penny IMO. And they really last, unlike a lot of aftermarket bulbs; I have been running the same 9011's for almost 100K miles in two of my cars.

The fine folks at rallylights.com sell 9011's: Susquehanna MotorSports - Auto Performance Product
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electric car conversion: Project ForkenSwift MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 857 11-16-2009 01:33 PM
AC Dodge Neon Electric Conversion Videos bennelson Fossil Fuel Free 50 11-16-2009 09:08 AM
FS Silver TDI Corrado with Black Leather 100% Diesel Conversion with Origninal Paint G60ING For Sale 8 03-09-2009 01:34 AM
Propane or natural-gas conversion kits! blackjackel Fossil Fuel Free 18 10-03-2008 10:01 AM
E-Bike Conversion Kits in Canada caledondave Introductions 3 07-30-2008 11:11 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com