Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-01-2011, 09:48 PM   #1 (permalink)
recently enlightened...
 
Jean-Seb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 56
Thanks: 12
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
High Torque starter more efficient ?

I was wondering if anyone knows if a high torque starter is more efficient than a full size one. I'm assuming it takes more energy but in a shorter period of time.

I have the full size one on the car and a high torque in the living room, I don't know if it's worth the time to put it on.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 10:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 829

The Van - '97 Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Max - '98 Maxima SE
90 day: 26.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
The high torque starter has a gear reduction which means it can start the engine with a smaller electric motor and most likely fewer amps. It also weighs a bit less. But to be quite honest, unless the one in your car is going out, there isn't an advantage to swapping it out.

Newer cars are going to high torque starters, which are likely cheaper to manufacture, and fit into tight spaces easier. So the availability of parts are better than for the old school starters, making it a favorite of starter rebuilders.
__________________

Gotta love wife, kids, and car!


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 07:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
recently enlightened...
 
Jean-Seb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 56
Thanks: 12
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks for the reply, now I have a good excuse to leave it in the parts box. lol

I'll need to do the experiment if I ever do put it on.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 08:59 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 118

starly - '82 starlet DL
90 day: 40.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 24 Times in 8 Posts
high torque starter motors (or gear reduction starter motors) are mostly used in newer engines due to the higher compression ratios they have. makes it easier on the starter than an original one
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 09:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: williamsburg, virginia
Posts: 2,061

Vulcan - '05 Vulcan 500 LTD
90 day: 60.08 mpg (US)

Mag Pearl - '011 Fiesta SE Hatch
90 day: 45.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 108
Thanked 309 Times in 228 Posts
Nissan was using them in the mid 1970S. Four cylinder was direct drive and 6cyl was gear reduction. Supposedly they like the gear reduction starters in drag racers. The direct drive ones would not hold up in the 6 cylinder cars for a long time.

regards
Mech


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com