09-21-2016, 10:55 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,936
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,801 Times in 938 Posts
|
Honda S-Dream Streamliner: 260 mph on ~190 HP
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vman455 For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
09-22-2016, 12:57 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,665
Thanks: 7,767
Thanked 8,575 Times in 7,061 Posts
|
It looks like a little Speed Demon, but you'd need to be one of those Paralympians to fit in the thing.
Darrel Vittone pushed an engine based on a 25hp VW case, in a Karmann Ghia body to 151.4 on that same Salt.
|
|
|
|
|
09-22-2016, 07:02 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
|
Looks more like the motorcycle class out there.
|
|
|
|
|
09-22-2016, 12:17 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,659
Thanks: 128
Thanked 764 Times in 461 Posts
|
I bet it would still do over 90 mph if you took dropped in the guts from my Insight!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
09-22-2016, 02:06 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
.........................
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455
|
Very cool, I always like seeing land speed cars. Especially those that go absurdly fast with tiny engines.
But...
I guess I expected a little more from a corporate backed team.
A real pioneer in Land Speed racing is Jack Costella and he has helped build a series of cars called the Nebulous Theorem that this Honda seems to borrow from heavily.
Link:
Jack Costella's Official Website
This Honda streamliner would fit into the J engine class (Under 750cc). Those records are currently set at 266mph (Fuel) and 269mph (Gas) by the Costella & Yacoucci team with a 700cc engine.
Link:
Bonneville Records
So, very cool. But I like the amateurs' car a bit better.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to darcane For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-22-2016, 03:10 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,665
Thanks: 7,767
Thanked 8,575 Times in 7,061 Posts
|
Jocko Johnson's Triple Nickel:
http://www.sonicwind.com/jocko-4.html
If I hadn't gone looking, I'd never have seen his M-B coupe
I note the NACA duct in the windshield.
The Sonic Wind website in general is on-topic
 |
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-22-2016, 11:16 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowmeat
I bet it would still do over 90 mph if you took dropped in the guts from my Insight!
|
I'd sure hope so, since my stock Insight can hit the high 90s on level roads & no headwind :-) |
|
|
|
|
09-23-2016, 03:15 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
.........................
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowmeat
I bet it would still do over 90 mph if you took dropped in the guts from my Insight!
|
Well, you're halfway there...
Power needed to overcome aerodynamic drag is proportional to speed cubed. At higher speeds, rolling resistance is a small factor and can be ignored to get a close approximation.
Assuming it takes 190hp to go 260mph in this car, 80hp (67hp gas engine, 13hp electric motor) will get it going... ~195mph.
It should do 90mph using just the electric motor from the insight. |
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to darcane For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-23-2016, 08:27 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,014
Thanks: 2,869
Thanked 2,513 Times in 1,553 Posts
|
I wonder what its fuel economy was at that speed.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
09-24-2016, 12:48 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
|
Cd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455
|
We could use a rear view of the car.If the parachute tubes are exposed,the Cd will be compromised.
With clamshell doors covering them,or an ejectable fairing (like Summers Brothers' Goldenrod) the Cd can be trimmed to the minimum.Around Cd 0.115 (subsonic).Less than 4-sq-ft frontal area.Weight is meaningless out there.They need all they can get to prevent wheel-spin and loss of control.
Low drag is nice.Driver safety is paramount.
PS @ above 250-mph,these cars are transonic,with shockwaves forming over parts of the body.The coefficient of drag will be transient,changing over the speed range.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
