Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > DIY / How-to
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-14-2011, 04:52 AM   #11 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 580

Princess - '92 MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
90 day: 33.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 113 Times in 79 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
if I reset the timing without jumping the ECU, the computer switched it back. If I recall properly, I just about watched the pulley move back to stock timing.
It might have been resetting idle speed by adjusting timing, not resetting base timing. Idle should have initially increased a bit when you turned the distributor.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________



Remember, even if you win the rat race - you're still a rat.

2010: 454.92L for 5313.90km => 8.56L/100km (27.5MPG US) (5 months)
2011: 606.11L for 7754.04km => 7.82L/100km (30.1MPG US) (Full year)
2012: 170.10L for 2405.00km => 7.07L/100km (33.3MPG US) (In progress)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2011, 07:43 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 801
Thanks: 46
Thanked 81 Times in 63 Posts
Most cars in the last couple of decades have automatic idle stabilization with more than enough control authority to keep the idle RPM steady with a small advance in ignition timing like that.

Generally cars are built with safety margins in just about everything important. Spark advance is such a thing--if a car does not have a knock sensor, the timing is almost always set such that even going uphill in Death Valley on a 110 degree day the car will not knock. Advancing the timing can cut into that margin, but under most driving conditions it won't matter.

If a car does have a knock sensor, chances are that it is set up to run much closer to the "ragged edge" where knock occurs. In that case adding static timing will mostly cause the knock sensor to retard the timing more than if it were in the stock position. Which basically gives you no effect from the mod.

I doubt that two degrees' advance will hurt anything in this case.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 11:23 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
cbaber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Saint Joseph, MO
Posts: 96

Lean and Mean - '98 Civic HX
Team Honda
90 day: 40.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
I know this thread is old but its important for potential DIY'ers to know that the #1 cylinder on Honda engines is the one farthest to the right (drivers side), not to the left near the distributor. I don't know if this effects setting your timing or not, but probably not since it seemed to work ok for you.
__________________
1998 Honda Civic HX
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 09:19 AM   #14 (permalink)
60+ mpg at posted speeds
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 1,190

Black and Green - '98 Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 64.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 384
Thanked 166 Times in 113 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbaber View Post
I know this thread is old but its important for potential DIY'ers to know that the #1 cylinder on Honda engines is the one farthest to the right (drivers side), not to the left near the distributor. I don't know if this effects setting your timing or not, but probably not since it seemed to work ok for you.
Thanks for the correction. I confirmed what you say in my copy of the Honda service manual, and you are right. I have made a note in the instructions identifying the error in the pics. And I'll retake the photos when I can. Thanks again. The thread may be old but it is still up on the internet, and I want it to be correct.
__________________


Black and Green will be rebuilt over decades as parts die--until it becomes a different car. Goal is only 60-70 mpg at posted speeds. I'm not trying for highest possible mileage.

Calculators: standard deviation, Ohms Law, & drag HP losses.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 01:29 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: B.C. CANADA
Posts: 66

WD-40's VX - '92 Civic VX
Team Honda
90 day: 53.71 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
An old indian (Nothing racist intended) trick to allow you to see the mark on the timing belt pulley is to use white chalk on it and rub off the excess.
The mark is cut into the pulley so rubbing off the excess leaves only the cut full of chalk. Now its bright and easy to see with the timing light.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 11:24 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 46

truck - '06 Silverado WT
90 day: 22.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
california98civic - do you have any small logger or scan gauge device able to measure engine knock? A widely used way to tune for gas mileage is to increase advance until knock then back off slightly, but then because you have no access to multiple tuning tables (VE, spark, throttle, pressure, airflow, rpm etc), you'd have to test for knock at WOT to be safe, then back off if it was knocking some at WOT (I thought all 1.6 civics of your year model had knock sensors). Short of that, a few degrees advance won't hurt anything (set back to stock for emissions time), unless it throws a code. If it throws a code after advancing the dizzy while driving, it's likely enriching the AFR and running in open loop (no fuel trims running off O2 sensors) then the adjustment was for nothing. Have you thought about a Hondata tune or do you already have one?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
Actually, the notion of the ECU undoing your changes is a myth, it couldn't possibly, it doesn't even know you have made any! The reason the car must be put in test engine mode is that it fixes the timing to a certain value, in normal mode the timing might be all over the place, making it impossible to adjust meaningfully with a light.
This depends on the vehicle, some vehicles with cam sensors run off spark maps in the ECU and no matter how much the dizzy is turned or what procedure is used, timing won't increase or decrease (it'll just be really out of tune with respect to the degreeing of the cam). Also some vehicles can adjust base/idle timing with the dizzy but won't affect engine under load, depends a lot on the vehicle/ECU/distributor. Honda's are pretty simple.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 12:00 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 385

1996 geo metro - '96 metro base
Thanks: 1
Thanked 54 Times in 42 Posts
bad idea - no gains - misery to be had

Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
Thanks for the caution. I appreciate it.

Here's an interesting link for anyone wanting more detail about advancing the timing and torque and other issues: What Happens When the Timing Is Advanced

Regards,
james
....The risk in advancing the timing is that the flame front (the increase in pressure) from the burning air/fuel mix strikes the piston head before, at, or too close to TDC to create the optimum forward rotation of the crank.

If the downward force reaches the top of the piston before the piston is able to react with a downward motion then the force is directly to the crank, rather than to the rotation (a bit like how landing on a stiff leg transmits the jar to the hip). .....


from the link -
peak combustion pressure must happen at 14 degrees ATDC for best results
always
except at idle
except on start

if you tamper with base ignition timing - you change peak combustion pressure timing by the amount of your tampering


there are already inconsistencies in peak combustion pressure timing events in non tampered with systems - if you move the average of those peaks back by advancing base ign timing some of those peaks will overlap
TDC

peak combustion pressure will happen before the piston has reached TDC
which is
bad

this is a very bad idea -
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 12:18 AM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 385

1996 geo metro - '96 metro base
Thanks: 1
Thanked 54 Times in 42 Posts
knock retard per cylinder graphed



this shows knock retard per cylinder in a VW Passat
Knock retard is the correction in ignition timing to prevent spark knock .
this system has so much ping that there is around 60kw of knock retard at 40% of calculated load
which on this system will peak around 95% - here it is much less

consider that the 4 cylinder vw engine in the jetta from that year has only 85kw maximum power output

why ?
customer is using poor quality 87 octane in an engine designed for 93octane and has been for some time , heavy carbon deposits from partial misfires have increased compression ratio in all cylinders
the car can not get out of it's own way ....

there are no DTCs and the "check money" light is off .

this is what a system that has knock correction will do if you advance base ignition timing beyond specification.
on a system without knock correction , results can be much worse

fix ?
solvents injected to clean carbon from combustion chambers and a tank of the correct top tier premium shell gas -
customer did not believe the difference this would cause ... until he felt it .

Last edited by mwebb; 03-28-2012 at 12:20 AM.. Reason: no DTCs
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 12:33 AM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 46

truck - '06 Silverado WT
90 day: 22.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
mwebb - if caly98 is only advancing 2 deg, nothings going to be hurt, especially if he drives for mileage, he'll never get anywhere near the peak combustion temps that kill engines. Ideally he'd go through some type of tuner that will only increase spark in a closed loop while cruising at a certain rpm range. But that's much more expensive than just turning the distributor
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2012, 01:24 PM   #20 (permalink)
60+ mpg at posted speeds
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 1,190

Black and Green - '98 Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 64.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 384
Thanked 166 Times in 113 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mja1 View Post
california98civic - do you have any small logger or scan gauge device able to measure engine knock? A widely used way to tune for gas mileage is to increase advance until knock then back off slightly, but then because you have no access to multiple tuning tables (VE, spark, throttle, pressure, airflow, rpm etc), you'd have to test for knock at WOT to be safe, then back off if it was knocking some at WOT
I have a scan tool that I bought for diagnostic purposes, and it offers some data my ultra gauge does not. But since I don't have a MAF sensor, I would not have that data on the tool either. By "spark" do you mean a timing advance readout or something else? Because the timing advance data would be inaccurate once I jump the system and start changing timing at the distributor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mja1 View Post
Have you thought about a Hondata tune or do you already have one?
I have thought about Hondata, and looked into it. My specific OBD2 ECU is not ideal for their services, though other 6th Gen Civic trim levels are (such as the EX). I wish I had a 2005+ HX. Its redesigned ECU is specifically cited as one that Hondata will tune for MPG if desired. That would be cool.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mwebb View Post
peak combustion pressure will happen before the piston has reached TDC
which is
bad

this is a very bad idea -
This would be true with a more aggressive advance, which I did not do, and with more aggressive driving, which I don't do. I advanced 2* and the car never crosses 2500/2600 RPMs. It will sit at lower cruise levels soon, when I switch-out the final drive gear for a VX 3.250:1 gear.

Lastly, I advanced the timing last May and have driven at least 10,000 miles since then. I'm fine.

Thanks for your concern and for offering your cautions to readers.

[EDIT: btw, I just remembered that one of your fixes I already do... I have been running 89 Octane for months.]


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________


Black and Green will be rebuilt over decades as parts die--until it becomes a different car. Goal is only 60-70 mpg at posted speeds. I'm not trying for highest possible mileage.

Calculators: standard deviation, Ohms Law, & drag HP losses.

Last edited by California98Civic; 03-28-2012 at 06:47 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com