Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-17-2011, 01:10 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
puddleglum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 158

Rondo - '07 Rondo EX
90 day: 25.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 30 Times in 16 Posts
How do you calculate EV fuel economy

I understand converting the cost of electricity to cost/mile and then to equivalent fuel economy. What I'm really wondering is if most of you include a value for battery depletion into your calculations. Since batteries have a limited cycle life, I would think they should be included as a fuel cost. I was reading an article from a guy with an EV Honda Civic that figured that, even though he only spent $40/year on electricity, when his battery costs were factored in, his cost/mile was actually higher as an EV than when the car was on gas. Just wanting to hear what your thoughts are.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2011, 01:42 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Jyvaskyla, Finland
Posts: 94

Golfwagen - '89 Golf mk2
90 day: 107.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Originally I was planning lead battery pack for my conversion because of relatively cheap price. After I made a excel file that roughly calculates this "economy" thing I turned my head and went lithium way. I included current price of electricity and gasoline, expected battery life, average fuel/electricity consumption and total price of batteries for given size pack in these calculations. I also noted kilometers driven each year. Lead and gasoline were pretty much in the same level depending on price of batteries and gasoline. But if lithium cells lasted anywhere over 1000 cycles they won this comparison. If you drive a lot lithium pack pays itself back faster. Might take years though, especially if you don't drive much.

I believe what he says. Cost/mile can be higher but it depends from at least those factors I mentioned.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2011, 03:12 AM   #3 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
I was just musing about that on the e bike thread...
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2011, 07:31 AM   #4 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,032

pimp mobile - '81 gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 259 Times in 203 Posts
Well the other thing to consider is that most people faced with a decision like "lead vs lithium" are considering building something, and it is going to be somewhat experimental in nature so they don't yet have a feel for how it will accelerate/etc. So since they don't even know if they will like the final result of their experiment yet there is a strong impetus to keep initial costs down, which favors lead to a large degree (including chargers and bms, etc).

As more EV's appear and people get more experience with what the numbers actually "feel" like, I expect that more will choose lithium style with confidence however.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com