Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-04-2010, 01:50 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
5speed5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 118

TBSS - '08 Trailblazer SS 2WD
90 day: 18.87 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '09 Impala SS
90 day: 22.96 mpg (US)

Big Blue Hippo - '06 HHR 2LT
90 day: 42.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
How do you feel about the EPA mpg rating change in 2008?

In 2008, the EPA changed it's mpg rating methods to account for faster speeds and acceleration, A/C use, and colder temperatures. This resulted in the lowering of the mpg ratings for all cars (and particularly for hybrids). (See video on the subject: 2008 Fuel Economy Tests )

For the 26 years I've been driving, I've always regularly beaten the EPA estimates for every car I've owned long before I ever heard of hypermiling or ecomodding...just using common-sense driving.

For me, the new numbers are less informative rather than more. Now when I look at the mpg numbers in a new-car ad, my brain instantly goes into "ignore mode".


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Daily driver:
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 01:54 AM   #2 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
You said it- same here.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 01:56 AM   #3 (permalink)
Honda Ecomodder
 
redline5th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jackson, TN
Posts: 46

The Civic - '98 Civic DX
90 day: 41.59 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Well, I guess they're going to be more lax... but they've always been lax. Like you said most people with common sense can get quite a bit more to the gallon.

I guess it's a good thing because they won't come across as "dishonest" to their customers.

People will be much happier when they get higher than the EPA's standards.

Yet at the same time it will be worthless to those of us that actually check our fuel mileage.
__________________
http://thechriscoleman.com/
Alas.... no more 40mpg -- Now B18C swapped.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 02:05 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
5speed5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 118

TBSS - '08 Trailblazer SS 2WD
90 day: 18.87 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '09 Impala SS
90 day: 22.96 mpg (US)

Big Blue Hippo - '06 HHR 2LT
90 day: 42.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
On the plus side, since ecomodder.com is using these new numbers, it makes me look like a really great hypermiler for my two trucks even though I would call my TBSS numbers plain lousy and the Colorado number (only one so far) is just barely acceptable.
__________________
Daily driver:
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 02:21 AM   #5 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
I can see an upside to the EPA basically mandating a lower number for all vehicles...

The next time CAFE standards are raised, the equivalent mileage of each vehicle (based on the way we all drive, and the way the ratings used to be) will actually be higher than the CAFE standards.

Since the EPA is downplaying everything, if CAFE raises the bar to 30MPG average, and the EPA averages have all gone down about 10% since 2008 changeover, that means that to meet the 30MPG standard, they'd have to be getting 33MPG by the "old" rating system.

I like.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Christ For This Useful Post:
Piwoslaw (03-04-2010)
Old 03-04-2010, 02:25 AM   #6 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Good point.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 02:31 AM   #7 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
Something about glass half full, et al.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 02:56 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,145
Thanks: 9
Thanked 98 Times in 78 Posts
Everybody loves to hate the EPA.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 07:14 AM   #9 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,674

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 54.91 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
I'm pretty sure the CAFE test is different than the EPA test. Thus, you get 33 mpg on the CAFE test, but the EPA test you only get 30 mpg. They aren't the same test.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 07:36 AM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maine
Posts: 758

oldscoob - '87 wagon gl/dr
90 day: 47.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
I ignore the numbers too. Always have. started in '87.
never called ecomod, but had long trips daily. Knowledge unfolds eventually. The net has helped this alot, forums like this one. Revealing the unknowns in your own car...

Once downdraft swapped out for injection, the numbers are crazier than ever.Even the horsepower numbers..it is a shame for anyone with a few years.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
101.5 MPG on my 2003 Ninja 250!!! theycallmeebryan Motorcycles / Scooters 264 04-23-2012 12:37 PM
Review: 2008 Nissan Altima 2.5 S, CVT RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 10 03-09-2010 02:40 AM
Review: 2008 Chevy Malibu LT (31.3 MPG) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 12 05-16-2009 09:07 AM
EM Blog: GM engineers feel MPG gauges should be in all cars MetroMPG Instrumentation 0 05-15-2008 02:07 PM
Review: 2009 Toyota Corolla LE (37.9 MPG) RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 22 05-09-2008 04:55 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com