02-18-2012, 03:17 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
How JAGUAR did aerodynamics
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
02-18-2012, 03:49 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
|
Cd
I did a speed-read through the article.Didn't see any drag data.
The original 1969 Datsun(Nissan) 240 Z had Cd 0.546.
The original E Type was estimated @ Cd 0.45.
|
|
|
|
|
02-18-2012, 06:54 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Windsor ON Canada
Posts: 373
Thanks: 21
Thanked 37 Times in 32 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
I did a speed-read through the article.Didn't see any drag data.
The original 1969 Datsun(Nissan) 240 Z had Cd 0.546.
The original E Type was estimated @ Cd 0.45.
|
It's so weird how such sporty looking cars back in the day had terrieble Cd, the newer SUV's have a better Cd than the 240z
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
02-19-2012, 11:12 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
Nice read, thanks. Just today saw an XJS in Robstown, TX at the truckstop.
|
|
|
|
|
02-20-2012, 12:05 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Wanting more for less
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 313
Thanks: 23
Thanked 73 Times in 45 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
I did a speed-read through the article.Didn't see any drag data.
The original 1969 Datsun(Nissan) 240 Z had Cd 0.546.
The original E Type was estimated @ Cd 0.45.
|
Are you sure of that 240Z Cd figure?
I've seen 0.465 or 0.467 quoted before, but nothing that high.
At least Datsun tried harder with the 280zx, it's usually quoted as 0.385  |
|
|
|
|
02-20-2012, 11:29 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 499
Thanks: 20
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
|
Jaguar had as many misses with their aero work as they did hits.
The C type overheated and all cars failed to finish at Le Mans. The D type did better.
The E type had a number about equal to a VW Kombi bus...around .45 as mentioned above.
The early XJ's did little better with .41 but the number was quoted with so many "adjustments" is was virtually meaningless.
The managed somewhat better after ditching Malcom Sayer and getting people under Ford's management who actually knew what they were doing.
Peter.
|
|
|
|
|
02-21-2012, 06:08 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
|
weird
Quote:
Originally Posted by GRU
It's so weird how such sporty looking cars back in the day had terrieble Cd, the newer SUV's have a better Cd than the 240z
|
No kidding! Most cars,vans,and SUVs today have lower Cds than the Corvette had when I was in college. |
|
|
|
|
02-21-2012, 06:22 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
No kidding! Most cars,vans,and SUVs today have lower Cds than the Corvette had when I was in college.
|
Fortunately we can still bash them with their enormous frontal area.
I love my 280Z.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to UFO For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 04:33 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D.O.G.
Are you sure of that 240Z Cd figure?
I've seen 0.465 or 0.467 quoted before, but nothing that high.
At least Datsun tried harder with the 280zx, it's usually quoted as 0.385 |
I second that figure based on several sources.
Datsun/Nissan actually performed water tunnel testing on the 240Z .
I used to have a Z car and it was like slamming on the brakes every time I tried to coast in that car. Absolutely horrible aerodynamics for such a sleek looking design.
|
|
|
|
|
