Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-28-2012, 12:01 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 382

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '011 CBR250R
90 day: 92.93 mpg (US)

Ninja 250R SE Green - '09 Ninja 250R SE
90 day: 65.9 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Fit Auto
90 day: 32.56 mpg (US)

Kawi Ninja650 - '07 Ninja650
90 day: 65.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 59 Times in 51 Posts
How long until we get rid of the camshaft?

How long before we are finally able to get rid of the cam shaft and put the infinite possibilities of computer control into our valve timing with electro magnetic lift? With direct injection and stratified charge, we could then also tend to eliminate the throttle plate.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 01:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
...I've wondered about that too, for years.

...if they ever migrate up from 12VDC electrical system to 48VDC as they proposed awhile ago, there's a darn good chance that direct electrical control of valve lift & duration could be 100% under computer control...unfortunately, it takes lots of CURRENT to make inertia "change" positions quickly, hence the need for higher VOLTAGE source.
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M

Last edited by Old Tele man; 01-28-2012 at 06:05 PM.. Reason: spelling error corrected
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 02:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,145
Thanks: 9
Thanked 98 Times in 78 Posts
You'll never get rid of the cam because it will always be cheaper, more efficient and more reliable than stuffing magnetic coils in a hot vibrating environment. Throttleless gasoline engines have been around for years.




Last edited by tjts1; 01-28-2012 at 02:10 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 03:17 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 590

Ladogaboy - '011 Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.18 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '011 Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 57 Times in 46 Posts
In terms of reliability, magnetic properties can be affected by the engine heat, so that is something else to take into consideration.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 04:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 491
Thanks: 17
Thanked 41 Times in 31 Posts
Sendler, sadly it may well take a long long time.

OHC and 4 valve / cylinder were around at the turn of the last century (ie 1900's or so) and look how long they took to become more or less standard.

Will technology drive cars or will the demands of the car makers drive technology?

I personally think car makers will adapt when they have absolutely no other options...and even then it will be a tantrum session to get it all to happen.

Peter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 06:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ashland, WI
Posts: 247

Nameless - '06 Canyon
90 day: 33.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 37 Times in 28 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
You'll never get rid of the cam because it will always be cheaper, more efficient and more reliable than stuffing magnetic coils in a hot vibrating environment.
I would not say never, but trying to pull a valve almost a half inch using an electromagnet is a real challenge. Doing it at the speeds necessary is beyond available materials.

I designed an electromagnet once to pull 1600 lbs over a quarter inch air gap. It needed over 200 volts at 50 amps to drive it.
__________________
34.9 MPG summer 2011. Winter 2011-2012 was warm, so only dropped to 30.1 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 06:37 PM   #7 (permalink)
Gen II Prianista
 
Rokeby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ballamer, Merlin
Posts: 391
Thanks: 155
Thanked 98 Times in 59 Posts
I guess hydralics are out of the running... too slow/complicated?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 06:51 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 590

Ladogaboy - '011 Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.18 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '011 Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 57 Times in 46 Posts
I think the biggest problem is that no one wants to put the energy into such a radical change for what is, ultimately, a dying technology.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 07:03 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: saskatoon
Posts: 13
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
As soon as it's cheaper to do it differently.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 07:06 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ashland, WI
Posts: 247

Nameless - '06 Canyon
90 day: 33.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 37 Times in 28 Posts
Electromagnets and hydraulics are much more complex and expensive than some bumps on a shaft. Also camshafts have much higher mechanical efficiency.

Dual cams with dual VVT have much of the theoretical efficiency benefits of fully programmable valve timing.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
34.9 MPG summer 2011. Winter 2011-2012 was warm, so only dropped to 30.1 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com