Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-08-2017, 01:26 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 51
Thanks: 28
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Ok, so I duct taped over the upper grill on my 2005 Civic but left the bottom open since that is where I put my transmission oil cooling radiator, and I don't want to overheat my transmission. I will reply with an update soon.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-08-2017, 06:05 PM   #12 (permalink)
Ecomuggler
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 5,261

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 40.43 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 33.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,169
Thanked 891 Times in 665 Posts
Also, while many newer cars have huge grills, much of that is fake. People want to believe they have a mouth-breathing monster, but there is no reason for it.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (09-08-2017)
Old 09-09-2017, 02:16 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 8,367
Thanks: 10,260
Thanked 4,399 Times in 2,441 Posts
how much

Quote:
Originally Posted by EcoCivic View Post
I have heard that between 1/4 and 1/3 of the aerodynamic drag on a car is from the cooling openings. That sounds like a LOT of the drag on a car is from air going through the radiator, and I have a hard time believing that cooling causes 1/4 to 1/3 of the aerodynamic drag on a car. If that were the case, wouldn't I have lost a measurable amount of gas mileage when the front grill fell off my 2005 Civic? I was sure that having a big hole in the front of my car would hurt highway mileage at least a little, but the effect on gas mileage even at 60-70 MPH on the highway was not measurable. Also, if drag from cooling was so significant, why do people only get 1-3 percent MPG improvements, presumably mostly from faster warm up, from a full grill block? nPlease help me understand!
I've never seen more than 16% of overall drag reported as a worse-case scenario.
2% is credited to good racing design.
1976 Ford Lameller Grille was associated with a 12% drag reduction
1938 Adler-Jaray saw 15.78% with a 100% block
2013 Dodge Dart,active shutters 3-to-5%
1982 Pontiac Trans AM bottom-breather 3.08%
1967 Corvette EV with 100% block 6.5%
1986 FIAT R&D 100% block 10.2%
1978 Chevette 4-DR with 100% block 7.56%
2009 Audi A2 100% block 9.7%
2007 Ford Fusion 999 hybrid LSR 100% block 7.35%
By the old metric,you'd see a 1% improvement in HWY mpg for every 2% drag reduction,based only upon the original mpg.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (09-13-2017), EcoCivic (09-09-2017)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com