Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-12-2017, 07:13 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 463
Thanks: 320
Thanked 107 Times in 81 Posts
How much does a belly pan or front air dam decrease drag?

I was thinking about making a belly pan for my 05 Civic to reduce aerodynamic drag. Then I read on this forum that I can get 75% of the aerodynamic benefit of a belly pan just by making a front air dam. If that is true, I would much rather save the time, money, effort and weight and just make a front air dam. How much of a difference does a front air dam make? I am considering making one, but I am not really a fan of the look. I would be OK with it though if I could gain at least 0.5 MPG on the highway. Is a gain of 0.5 MPG or more likely to happen? Thanks for the help, I am new to Ecomodder.


Last edited by EcoCivic; 07-12-2017 at 10:16 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-12-2017, 07:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
Almost as much as an air dam.
The front under the car is so aerodynamically poor it's best just to block off the air flow.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (07-12-2017)
Old 07-12-2017, 07:43 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 463
Thanks: 320
Thanked 107 Times in 81 Posts
But would an air dam block the airflow under the car? To me it would seem like the air would just go through the gap at the air dam and just go under the car anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2017, 08:36 PM   #4 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
Yeah it's one of those counter intuitive things that has been proven time and time again in the wind tunnel.
That's why the belly pan improves aero. Because all the stuff hanging down, pockets and gaps causes a ton of drag.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (07-12-2017)
Old 07-12-2017, 08:50 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Memphis, Tn
Posts: 463
Thanks: 320
Thanked 107 Times in 81 Posts
Very interesting, thank you. How much of a difference does a front air dam make? I am considering making one, but I am not really a fan of the look. I would be OK with it though if I could gain at least 0.5 MPG on the highway. Is a gain of 0.5 MPG or more likely to happen?
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EcoCivic For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-15-2017)
Old 07-12-2017, 10:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
The general rule is airdam no lower than the lowest part of the undercarriage. Frontal area isn't affected.

0.5mpg starting from 20 or 60mpg? Probably doable at 30-40mpg.

The belly pan gets increasingly important toward the rear. Under the engine compartment you should be aware of cooling air flow. At least a partial pan behind the rear axle will set things up for a diffuser, which is at least as important as the air dam.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
EcoCivic (07-12-2017)
Old 07-15-2017, 12:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
difference

Quote:
Originally Posted by EcoCivic View Post
Very interesting, thank you. How much of a difference does a front air dam make? I am considering making one, but I am not really a fan of the look. I would be OK with it though if I could gain at least 0.5 MPG on the highway. Is a gain of 0.5 MPG or more likely to happen?
I GOOGLED images of the '05 CIVIC.It looks like Honda may have already optimized the airdam on the car.
There is a chance that lowering the airdam down to around 3-inches of ground clearance might cut drag an additional 1% but it would strike every driveway ramp,curb,and parking lot barrier unless you were very vigilant in your driving.
$1,000,000 concept cars and supercars get around this with active aero and adjustable-height suspension systems.
I'd have you look under the next Tesla you can find and inspect how Musk's team engineered that belly.You'd be looking at the industry standard for a low drag belly and diffuser.
I can't tell you what difference in Cd it would make.But if you're interested in aft-body streamlining later on,the belly would insure really good flow back there,which in mandatory for boat-tailing to function to it's highest potential.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (07-18-2017), COcyclist (07-17-2017)
Old 07-17-2017, 11:16 AM   #8 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
Welcome Eco, I have used airdams on many vehicles over the years and they do help mpg at highway speeds. As Aerohead stated they are very easy to strike on all kinds of objects even if you think you are being careful. Several of my airdams were commercially made including the GLH factory airdam I installed on my Dodge Omni. I can tell you I have broken every one. I use a full belly pan now and it is holding up very well.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to COcyclist For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-22-2017), mcrews (09-26-2017)
Old 07-17-2017, 11:45 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
puddleglum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 421

Rondo - '07 Kia Rondo EX
Last 3: 20.47 mpg (US)

Tinkertoy2 - '00 Toyota Echo base
Team Toyota
Last 3: 46.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 96 Times in 69 Posts
I found on my Rondo that a full air dam hurt my mileage but a partial on both front corners and installing a belly pan helped. Different cars and different air dams are going to perform differently. You may have to do some experimenting with cheap materials first. I am a fan of belly pans. They are more work, but are more effective IMO. The other advantage of the pan is raising under hood temps and reducing warm up time in colder weather. In my mind it's a win win. Only downside I've found is mine increase cabin noise a bit.
__________________



Almost all my driving is done 1-5 miles at a time.
Best short trip: 2.4 l/100 km, 3.9 km
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to puddleglum For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-22-2017), COcyclist (08-09-2017)
Old 09-23-2017, 03:03 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
teoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,245

A3 - '12 Audi A3
Thanks: 65
Thanked 225 Times in 186 Posts
What about an active airdam that lowers itself one above a certain speed?

Would an angled airdam have any negative effects? Something like a hinged panel that is attached on front and lowers itself.

Or the inverse, atached at the back side and is pulled up with a small servo motor via rope. The wind would swing it open when the speed goes up, the servo would pull it up when not needed.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com