Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-11-2016, 04:55 AM   #1 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
HP to get tires up to speed

I just tried to figure out how much power it takes to get my tires up to 65 mph and was blown away at the result. Does it really take 65 hp to get four 75 lb wheels up to 65 mph??? No wonder the truck is slower with these heavy digs compared to the light trailer tires that were on it before!

I forgot the brakes at 30 lbs each.

I love the way they carry weight and grab at the ground, but holy moly batman, 65 hp?!?!?! I only have 150 hp to begin with!!!!

Does anyone know if this is right? Most of the weight is near the outside, since they are armored tires and have 1" thick sidewalls. No idea how thick the tread portion is, but i can air the tires down to nothing and they still look like they are "properly" inflated.

If anyone can give me some insight (haha) on this, go for it. I guess it comes out to about 400 lbs of wheel/brakes to get to 65 mph.

__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-11-2016, 06:03 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,998

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,711
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,454 Posts
I'll recalculate in metric.
300 lbs is almost 150 kg,
65 mph is about 30 meter per second.

Rotational mass on the outside of the wheel takes twice the effort to speed up (one time for motion relative to the vehicle, one for absolute average movement).
The power needed to reach a speed is the quadrate of that speed in m/s times the mass, divided by 2.

It takes 150 * 2 * (30 * 30 / 2) = 135.000 Joules to get those wheels up to speed.
One hp is about 740 Joules per second (Watt), times 65 is about 50 kiloWatt

If all this is correct the mass of your wheels add 2.7 seconds to the time needed to speed up to 65 mph using 65 hp.
It would take one second at 180 hp, it would take 3 minutes on one horse.

Why would you want to go that fast?
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.

Last edited by RedDevil; 11-11-2016 at 06:59 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2016, 06:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
I am figuring for interstate speeds. Either way, thats a lot of lost power that ultimately gets turned into heat.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2016, 01:28 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
LittleBlackDuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Land Downunder
Posts: 229

CT - '11 Lexus CT200h Luxury
Thanks: 26
Thanked 80 Times in 61 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaacCarlson View Post
I am figuring for interstate speeds. Either way, thats a lot of lost power that ultimately gets turned into heat.
Wrong! It is stored as kinetic energy stored in the spinning wheels. Basic physics.

Simon
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2016, 01:29 AM   #5 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,456

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,211
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
HP is a rate of energy, not a total quantity of energy. Therefore, you can accellerate anything of any mass up to any speed with any HP, given enough time.

As RedDevil points out, it doesn't make sense to talk about HP without also including a time factor.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2016, 01:29 AM   #6 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LittleBlackDuck View Post
Wrong! It is stored as kinetic energy stored in the spinning wheels. Basic physics.

Simon
Wrong! The end result is always heat, basic physics.
It is only stored until you stop.

__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com