Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Success Stories
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-30-2014, 11:38 PM   #51 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I didn't look at the patent either; I saw the lil picture.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-31-2014, 01:34 AM   #52 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carson City, Nevada
Posts: 612

Jimmy - '00 GMC Jimmy SLT
90 day: 21.18 mpg (US)

The White Gnat - '99 Suzuki Swift
Team Suzuki
90 day: 51.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 240
Thanked 114 Times in 90 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
Which is the beauty of this forum, everyone is just picking it apart - like chefs looking for meat in a vegetarian salad.

No meat here. Just meat flavoring.
Sorta like, "where's the beef?" ?
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2014, 08:38 AM   #53 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
Which is the beauty of this forum, everyone is just picking it apart - like chefs looking for meat in a vegetarian salad.

No meat here. Just meat flavoring.
Not meat flavoring, so much as meat by-products.

__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2014, 03:12 PM   #54 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 42.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
Then you're the guy who could answer this: don't rare earth magnets have a really sharp drop off of effectiveness at some critical temperature? And that critical temperature isn't all that hot.

Just as a f'rinstance, like a not-too-exotic N45 neodymium, the critical temp is...what?

[looks up "Curie temperature"]

Okay, never mind. Inside the engine is hot, but not THAT hot.
It's more complicated than that. Things like "temperature coefficient of coercivity" that the electrical engineer in the next office understood far better than I did. Which is why he chose samarium cobalt magnets for use in a liquid cooled electric motor operating at 250 deg F. My electromagnets ran at slightly above room temperature, so I chose neodymium magnets for the higher energy product.

The temperatures of a piston pretty much rule out any permanent magnet.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 08:37 AM   #55 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
^^
It looked to me like he was describing the magnets being attached not to the piston directly, but to the crankshaft. It's a little cooler there.

And still I give the idea no credence. I mean, it isn't without some merit but really it only appears to be shoving the IMA bits inside the crankcase, like the other guy said. And that's just daft. There are no unique gains to be had by it, it would likely necessitate making the crankcase bigger to accommodate the extra bits - try finding a manufacturer who's going to do THAT - and it would radically complicate the process of working on the engine AND the hybrid system. As if labor charges weren't high enough already.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 11:22 AM   #56 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 42.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
If you really stuffed an engine full of electromagnets, you could maybe get the engine to turn over. But you would never get useful power out of it.

Electric motors have only a few thousandths of an inch clearance between the rotor and stator for a reason. Increasing that clearance by only a thousandth of an inch measurably reduces power and efficiency.

Pelmear's patent talks about an electromagnet in the cylinder head pulling up on a permanent magnet in the piston when the piston is near the bottom of the stroke. A real world electromagnet that fit in the head would have trouble picking up a paper clip at that distance. It's clear that the Pelmear engine is pure vaporware.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 03:01 PM   #57 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 11

SKIP-FIRE - '87 Mercury Topaz LS
90 day: 80.42 mpg (US)

HP2g - '87 Ford Mustang LX
90 day: 122.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
HP2g Hybrid Engine

Thanks for inquiring. There is no big battery bank, fuel is used instead of plugging in. You should go to the Energy Technology Company w/ 110mpg Hybrid V8 Engine. website for answers to your questions


Quote:
Originally Posted by sarguy01 View Post
Okay, so your engine deactivates cylinders, has electro magnets in the cylinders and has a built in system so the crankshaft acts like an electric motor. I'm left with a lot of questions...

When is the electric crankshaft motor adding power? With a V-8, I wouldn't think you'd need any assistance in reaching 400 hp. Does the test car use a battery pack or is this motor generating that much energy and not storing it? If the motor is making that much energy, doesn't that use valuable E85 power just to spin a generator/alternator? It takes energy to make electricity, so how much fuel is used just to power the electric motor crankshaft? Isn't this the same argument as HHO systems? In real applications, it would take a large amount of electricity to generate an ample amount of hydrogen, which would end up making the engine use way more fuel? How much torque can your electric motor crankshaft deliver?

How do the magnets work? Do they pull and then push the piston down? I am assuming the pistons have a piece of iron in them or an electromagnet of some sort. Does that add a lot of weight to the rotating mass of the engine? Is this used in conjunction with the electric crankshaft motor, like running both at the same time?

During the cylinder deactivation, are the valves opening to allow the rotating mass to spin freely or do the valves stay shut? During cylinder deactivation, are the cylinder magnets running and is the crankshaft electric motor running? Can one cylinder effectively push the vehicle along and generate enough electricity to power the magnets/motor?

Do you have any pictures of this engine? I'd like to see what you have aside from an animated Youtube video. It’s patented, so would it hurt to show us a few pics of the crankshaft and cylinder magnets??
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2014, 05:23 PM   #58 (permalink)
Hydrogen > EV
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,025

Silver Flea - '05 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 994
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
Go to your website for answers? I don't mean this in a critical way, but couldn't you just provide them?
__________________





Best Tanks:
Mustang - 54.83 mpg (US) at the Green Grand Prix
Insight - 82.91966 mpg (US) over 818.5 miles.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to UltArc For This Useful Post:
sarguy01 (06-09-2014)
Old 06-09-2014, 08:33 PM   #59 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sarguy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 468

Mazda5 - '12 Mazda 5
90 day: 25.22 mpg (US)

Big D - '11 Dodge Durango Crew
90 day: 18.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 86
Thanked 87 Times in 54 Posts
Your website is vague. There are no pics of the motor. Lots of marketing and little proof of an actual product.

No wonder no one believes anything you write.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sarguy01 For This Useful Post:
pgfpro (06-10-2014)
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
110mpg, engine, hp2g, hybrid





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com