Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > DIY / How-to
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-27-2011, 05:24 PM   #461 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Dr. Jerryrigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: mass
Posts: 175

The Sh*t-Box - '99 Impreza Outback Sport
90 day: 27.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldbeaver View Post
I made my own kit of a very hard iron, very heavy, and expensive.
It produced a lot of HOH gas
Please give all the data you can. How much gas? What wattage was is using? If you can please do some mpg testing.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Redneck Repair forum
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2011, 11:30 AM   #462 (permalink)
57.4 mpg best trip.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chile
Posts: 143

Mercedes 89 D - '89 300 E
90 day: 33.86 mpg (US)

Skodie - '09 Octavia TDI PD
90 day: 41.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to oldbeaver
HOH kit real experience details

Sorry, I typed a long answer to you, twice, and it was lost by the system, and I was logged out.

All my effort for you was lost, TWICE.

I will not type it for a third time.

Oldbeaver
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2011, 12:09 PM   #463 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,724

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 459 Times in 315 Posts
oldbeaver -

Sorry about that. What browser are you using? If you are having logout problems, please check the "Remember Me" box when you login. That stops the auto-logout for most users.

When I have long posts I usually type them in a Notepad and then copy-paste them into my reply.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2011, 03:14 PM   #464 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
After losing several long, involved, researched, carefully composed compositions to cyberspace I got in the habit of making long compositions either in MS Word, or in a draft in my email.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2011, 04:02 PM   #465 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,724

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 459 Times in 315 Posts
Frank -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
After losing several long, involved, researched, carefully composed compositions to cyberspace I got in the habit of making long compositions either in MS Word, or in a draft in my email.
Yes, that's good advice and practice in general. From my understanding this forum is using off-the-shelf software, so a percentage of the problems you see here are true for many forums.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2011, 08:57 PM   #466 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Dr. Jerryrigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: mass
Posts: 175

The Sh*t-Box - '99 Impreza Outback Sport
90 day: 27.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldbeaver View Post
Sorry, I typed a long answer to you, twice, and it was lost by the system, and I was logged out.

All my effort for you was lost, TWICE.

I will not type it for a third time.

Oldbeaver
Sorry to hear that. It's happened to me a few times. My trick is to copy the post so I can paste it if something goes wrong.
If you feel like writing it for a third time, I'd really like to read it.
__________________
Redneck Repair forum
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2011, 02:55 PM   #467 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Posts: 76

sukisuki - '00 Grand Vitara 4wd
90 day: 21.88 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
Here, just to add more gasoline to the fire!
http://pesn.com/2011/03/03/9501777_H...esis_Approved/
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2011, 03:07 PM   #468 (permalink)
57.4 mpg best trip.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chile
Posts: 143

Mercedes 89 D - '89 300 E
90 day: 33.86 mpg (US)

Skodie - '09 Octavia TDI PD
90 day: 41.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to oldbeaver
Real world HHO kit results

Here are my results building and testing HHO systems in my car.

First, lot of people claim high gains with this system. Other people gave Thermodynamics explanations that concluded it is impossible to get power gains with the system.

This attracted me as I am a DIY kind of guy. I decided to build my own system.

I constructed two HOH systems myself.

First system:

The first followed the plans sold in the Internet. It consumed 30 A and produced bubles . However, rpm of the car slowed down when connected. This means it took more energy from the car (through the battery) than the energy it added as HOH gas combustion.
The engine was a Nissan aspirated diesel of 1996.
Additional problems: the system warmed up a lot, then the current consumption overflow the ammeter capacity. The stainless steel used here corroded after three loads of NAOH solution.
It was impossible to run a complete tank of diesel as water evaporated.

Second system:

Then I decided to construct a second system, following instructions of an engineer from the Internet. Then I used a special, very hard, very heavy, very expensive stainless steel.
Making holes broke my tools ten times here.
After assembling and installed in the car, this system produced about five times more HOH gas, and used only half the electricity from the battery. So it was 10 times more efficient than previous system.
However, even though, when connected the engine slowed down, so there was a negative gain of energy too. If it was producing more bang the engine would have accelerated.
Additional problems:
Water didnn´t evaporate so quickly, but production of gas was so much that I had to attach a 12V pump to blow solution to the bubbler. Otherwise, gas becomes to push down the gas in the electrolysis device.
I wanted to sell this device to a truck transport company, but as it didn´t increase power, it wouldn´t increase fuel miling too.
It was impossible to complete a full tank with this system too, not because evaporation or consumption of water, but for foam formation, due to the pumping.

Conclusion: This do not work as claimed by sellers. At all.

I have pictures of the seond system and the system itself.

Oldbeaver
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2011, 04:18 PM   #469 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 26
Thanks: 10
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
The basic issue is that the computer control module (ECM) will add fuel as the Oxygen sensor senses cleaner exhaust. As you know, the leaner a system burns the higher the NOX. I've seen these systems work on small engines (i.e. lawnmower engines) with no ECM, and run well. But place that same system into a vehicle that is x10 the displacement and has an ECM and it never works.

My brother owns a trucking company in OKC and he hired a company to retrofit his semi, but the only result was a clean exhaust. Without the HHO system the semi bellows black smoke but with the system there was no black smoke. But there was no mpg gains either. They adjusted the ECM (yes diesels have them too) but it isn't worth paying the large expense of the system just to clean up the exhaust with no payback. At the same time they took a smaller system and put it in his company pickup truck, Titan V8. Even with missing around with the ECM and tricking the mass air flow sensor, never saw a 1.10th of an mpg gain.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2011, 06:13 PM   #470 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 723

Beetle - '01 Beetle GLS
90 day: 42.61 mpg (US)

4x4 - '89 Pickup DLX
90 day: 30.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 60 Times in 42 Posts
Black smoke is unburned fuel, and will indicate lower mileage.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________

"We think B20 is for suckers" N. Cowell, Denver B100
"Climate change denial is a conclusion in search of a rationalization" labman57
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what do you think of hydrogen mods (with video) igo EcoModding Central 18 11-13-2008 01:54 PM
Hydrogen Less than Gas Arminius The Lounge 4 08-03-2008 03:48 PM
GM's new hydrogen car SVOboy Fossil Fuel Free 0 01-08-2008 01:34 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com