Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-08-2009, 12:49 PM   #11 (permalink)
Monster under my bed
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 996

Svietlana - '05 307 SW
Diesel
90 day: 52.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 162
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
What's interesting is they're offering the Blue model as the least expensive one in the Accent lineup.
Can't be. That's just not what car companies have gotten us used to in the last few years. I can (almost) understand someone not getting a better FE car b/c it was much more expensive, but now who would buy a non-Blue Accent?

If only other car companies were like that...


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"You can't call yourself human if you think only of yourself."

Don't laugh at things you don't understand.

Quote:
The more you drive, the less you think. Thats why I always take the bus.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 01:51 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Safety Harbor, FL
Posts: 57

Lil Sulf - '94 Corolla
Team Toyota
90 day: 39.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smaller engines are generally less expensive, right? I don't know if there is a difference in engine displacement or some other specs, but smaller is usually cheaper to build, right? Hyundai is offering FE as the cheaper route, and those that want more power or acceleration or w/e can pay for it.

Hyundai is getting major +rep in my eyes.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

And that's without a Scangauge o.O
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 03:07 PM   #13 (permalink)
Monster under my bed
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 996

Svietlana - '05 307 SW
Diesel
90 day: 52.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 162
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sulfuric View Post
Smaller engines are generally less expensive, right? I don't know if there is a difference in engine displacement or some other specs, but smaller is usually cheaper to build, right?
That's how it should be, but look at the prices of an SUV and a modern econocar. The latter is like 3 times smaller, its engine has 6 times smaller displacement, but costs at least the same (or more likely more) than the SUV.
This is partially because of politics, and partially because the smaller engine is usually more advanced technologically.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"You can't call yourself human if you think only of yourself."

Don't laugh at things you don't understand.

Quote:
The more you drive, the less you think. Thats why I always take the bus.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 03:26 PM   #14 (permalink)
marcusmodder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 867

The Golden Egg - '93 Previa DX
90 day: 26.97 mpg (US)

Chewie - '03 Prius
90 day: 48.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 116 Times in 65 Posts
Where is the ecomodder badge? Where are the ecomodder royalties? Seriously, they should have a thread here somewhere where we could help them out. The rear end of all these cars need help.

It reads like a project list. I'm still surprised at how modest these numbers are considering the 15 year old metro still has them beat by miles with 38 city, 45 highway mpg.

I'm still waiting for the mild hybrid plug in alternatorless edition.
__________________
"I'd love to have an affordable, efficient hydrogen car. I'd park it next to my unicorn"


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 12:13 AM   #15 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,735

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 78.84 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 81.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 273 Times in 172 Posts
One thing to remember is the relatively small increases in highway MPG from aero & gearing tweaks may actually work out to be better in real life, because the average speed of the EPA highway test is only 48 mph.

Yet another reason the official tests should include a simple top gear fuel consumption vs speed graph.

EG. if MPG @ a steady 70 MPH were a regularly discussed data point about cars, the manufacturers would have a greater incentive to do the mods (like aero) that would have a large effect on it.
__________________
Latest project:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Latest test:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
- electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 09:22 AM   #16 (permalink)
Driving the Rolling Couch
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 348
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by basjoos View Post
I wonder what the rpm of the engine is at 60mph. The Fit and Yaris are both buzzbombs at highway speeds.
My fiancee's 09 Fit AT turns about 2200 RPM at 60. At 70-75 it's around 2600 IIRC. She gets about 30-31 city and ~41 highway, more if she keeps her foot out of it.

If you read closely, the major differences in the Blue vehicles are the eco-things such as the aero and the shift light. The engine changes are spread throughout the model.

I'd buy a basic Accent quickly if I needed a little commuter/runabout.
__________________
1999 Buick LeSabre
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hyundai ecomods the 2010 Elantra - MPG up by 8% city, 6% hwy MetroMPG EcoModding Central 23 10-08-2009 05:12 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com