Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-13-2011, 01:20 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA Northeast
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I want to completely remove my belt

I only have two drains on my belt: power steering and alternator. The solution for the power steering is easy, just loop the rack lines and develop some arm strength. At that point it seems silly to have a belt just for the alternator, so I'd like to learn to stop using that too. People have recommended deep cycle batteries and solar chargers, but I wonder if I could take a simpler approach. I was hoping I could just run without the belt for as long as possible, then pull it back on and charge back up as needed.

In order to minimize current usage, I was planning to remove the wiring for every unecessary device, such as the radio and (maybe) cabin fan. I was also hoping that I could push start the vehicle as often as possible. I once had a 4.0 liter explorer 4x4 with a bad starter, and I push started it everywhere I went for at least a month. My current motor is only 1.6 L and will have no belt or transfer case, so I believe it will be a lot easier to pop start. The question is, will I damage or excessively wear down any parts by doing this?

My plan was to try this until the battery dies, and then plan to hook up the belt and charge whenever I reach 80% of that time interval. So another couple of questions, how long would my battery keep it's charge like this, and how long does it take to fully charge back up?

I also might install an aluminum underdrive pulley to minimize the wasted energy when there is no belt.

Thanks!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-13-2011, 02:04 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 433 Times in 353 Posts
With an under-drive pulley the alternator is still trying to put out the same number of watts and if anything it is going to have a harder time doing so at an idle so at an idle you will still have that load on your engine but it's not going to be doing any useful work, or if it is it will be stressing the alternator more and could make it fail sooner.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2011, 02:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA Northeast
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks, I would install a smaller alternator pulley as well so they are still matched. The goal of the underdrive pulley would be to minimize drain with no belt. A lighter smaller crankshaft pulley should take less energy to spin.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2011, 02:38 PM   #4 (permalink)
in tents
 
dennyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 158

The Adventure Wagon - '94 Subaru Loyale Wagon 4x4
Subaru
90 day: 33.43 mpg (US)

Electro-Monkey - '11 Surly Karate Monkey BMC V2S Front Hub Motor
90 day: 694.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 31 Times in 23 Posts
Install an onboard trickle-charger and just plug your car in every night. It's better to charge your battery from the grid than by burning gasoline in a small engine.

You can do daily driving without the belt, and run the belt for long road trips that would drain the battery.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2011, 02:50 PM   #5 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
First off, if you start deep cycling your starting battery it will die fairly quick. They simply aren't made to do that. Second, if you recharge from the alternator its just as bad doing it now vs later (unless later is always during braking, aka regenerative braking). Also, the radio and fan don't use any power if they aren't on (ok, the radio uses a tiny amount, not worth removing anything). You definitely need to keep the cabin fan for defogging the windows and heat. I dunno, I think your way is way more complex and more inconvenient than just disabling the alternator, getting a deep cycle battery, and charging from an outlet. I've been running for over a year with my alternator disable and it works great.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2011, 03:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurcher
 
mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 333
Thanks: 148
Thanked 109 Times in 80 Posts
Hi 07aveoSVM,
The engine rotating parts are 10 times heavier than that pulley. You won't be able to measure the difference between an over sized pulley and an under sized one in the amount of power the engine needs just to spin.

But anyway your main electrical load will be your engine electronics, and brake lights as needed. Assuming you don't drive at night. If you get LED brake lamps you can reduce that load by about 80% The engine, gauges and other incidentals might need 10 to 20 amps. A car battery has a reserve capacity (RC) rating, which is how many minutes it will deliver 25 amps before it is so run down it probably won't start the engine. RC is in the range of 80 to 100 minutes mostly. So you could probably run the engine for 3 or 4 hours. Assuming newish good battery with a full charge. Charging time with the alternator will probably be about the same as discharging time. The alternator will deliver a very large initial charge, but that will taper off quickly to 10 or so amps and the battery will take a few hours of that.

But but but, I don't see what you are saving. Unless you charge the battery from the grid...
-mort
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2011, 05:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,390

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,187
Thanked 4,378 Times in 3,353 Posts
Daox- How often are you having to purchase a new battery? I've often wondered how much money can be saved in fuel vs the cost of more frequent battery replacement. I normally get 8yrs or so on a battery in a car with an functioning alternator.

As everyone else has stated, the under-drive pulley won't help much, and you need to charge the battery from the grid to get any benefit.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2011, 06:05 PM   #8 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 286 Times in 199 Posts
You're going to need to install suspenders!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RobertSmalls For This Useful Post:
mort (05-13-2011)
Old 05-13-2011, 07:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 07aveoSVM View Post
Thanks, I would install a smaller alternator pulley as well so they are still matched. The goal of the underdrive pulley would be to minimize drain with no belt. A lighter smaller crankshaft pulley should take less energy to spin.
Smaller pulley = belt has to bend and unbend more to get around it = less efficient drive.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2011, 09:22 PM   #10 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
Daox- How often are you having to purchase a new battery? I've often wondered how much money can be saved in fuel vs the cost of more frequent battery replacement. I normally get 8yrs or so on a battery in a car with an functioning alternator.
We still have to wait and see. I've been using the current new battery for a little over a year. Before that, I had acquired a heavily used deep cycle battery that was on its last leg. That one lasted me roughly 1 year, but wouldn't keep the voltage up in winter thus the new battery.

__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com