Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-31-2011, 10:04 AM   #1 (permalink)
n00b
 
stimpsonjcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dawsonville
Posts: 36

stimpsF150 - '01 F-150 Supercrew
90 day: 16.5 mpg (US)

stimpversa - '010 Versa S
Team Nissan
90 day: 34.37 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Idling in N vs D observations

Before I got my scangauge I had done a little testing with my generic ODB reader and had noticed that the % load indicator did show a significant difference between idling in gear vs D in my automatic. So while I don't shut off my engine at lights, I do shift into N if I know it will be a long light.

I have retested this with the scangauge by timing the amount of time it takes for my overall tank average to drop a tenth of a MPG while sitting still in N vs D.

The difference is about 30%. Which is to say that sitting at a light in N costs you 70% of sitting there in D.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stimpsonjcat For This Useful Post:
Cd (09-01-2011)
Old 08-31-2011, 11:05 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 484

Bonnie - '98 Bonneville SSE
3800
90 day: 26.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 65
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
I would look at gal per hr difference I'm not sure exactly what your results were due to the wording, but on my car shifting in to N the gph increases for a short time then slowly drops down to use slightly less than when in D. I do not bother to shift into N when at a light as I will need to be sitting for about a minute for it to matter.
__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 11:59 AM   #3 (permalink)
Ohh snap
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 848

Lesbaru - '00 Outback
90 day: 21.98 mpg (US)

Convertalier - '00 Cavalier Z24 Convertible
90 day: 26.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 44
Thanked 87 Times in 46 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
I've found the only difference whether the transmission is in Neutral or Drive with the engine idling is if I'm on the brakes or not. Holding them down brings up the gph by .02 usually. So I just use the emergency brake if it's going to be a short stop. No paying for the brake light use out of my gas tank!
__________________

Daily Driver
Winter Beast
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 12:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Kodak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 346

Canyon - '07 Canyon 2wd regular cab
90 day: 24.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 37 Times in 23 Posts
Any rpm difference stimpson?
__________________
EcoDriving: Turning more fuel into usable forward motion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 01:59 PM   #5 (permalink)
n00b
 
stimpsonjcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dawsonville
Posts: 36

stimpsF150 - '01 F-150 Supercrew
90 day: 16.5 mpg (US)

stimpversa - '010 Versa S
Team Nissan
90 day: 34.37 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Hmmm...i will revisit this and check the gph also.

My basic premise was that if the load drops then the fuel use should also.

I had noticed that on short trips the avg usage tends to drop fast when stopped, so i just timed how fast it dropped in N vs D.

It is probably the same math either way, but i will go look at the gph display and we shall see.

Fun tool to play with!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 12:34 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orange Country, CA
Posts: 89

Leviticus - '97 Sebring Convertible JX
90 day: 21.33 mpg (US)

Fiesta - '012 Fiesta SE
90 day: 30.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I think it really depends on the car, I've seen people say their gph goes down in N and others say it's lower in D.
For example, in my car in D gph is about .45-.49, while in N it usually stays above .50.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 12:41 AM   #7 (permalink)
Engineering first
 
bwilson4web's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 677

03 Prius - '03 Prius
90 day: 52.67 mpg (US)

10 Prius - '010 Prius III
90 day: 53.31 mpg (US)
Thanks: 58
Thanked 119 Times in 86 Posts
It is likely to be a function of the vehicle warm-up state, somewhat specific to the make and model. In our 2003 Prius:
  • coolant below 70C - engine will run unless in "R"
  • unloaded "N" idle - runs about 0.30 gallons/hr
  • loaded "D" idle - runs about 0.60 gallons/hr
  • sometimes when stopped - "R" and pulse engine turns engine off
  • coolant 70C and above - engine can "auto off" following the multi-stage warm-up
Regardless of which car, the ScanGauge or an OBD scanner that shows mass air flow is needed to track the fuel burn. Then experiment and find out what works.

Bob Wilson
__________________
Local record

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 11:52 AM   #8 (permalink)
n00b
 
stimpsonjcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dawsonville
Posts: 36

stimpsF150 - '01 F-150 Supercrew
90 day: 16.5 mpg (US)

stimpversa - '010 Versa S
Team Nissan
90 day: 34.37 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
New testing, fully warmed vehicle.

-Idling in N shows gph = 0.18
-Idling in D shows gph = 0.22

Quick math tells me I wait at between 6 and 12 minutes worth of lights per day.

So best case savings = 0.2 hours of idle * 0.04 gph delta = 0.008 g/day saved.

At 240 days a year driving this is 1.92 gallons.

Hmmm...doesn't seem at all worth the effort.

I will abandon this method for a few days and check overall mpg for effect.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 12:40 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 18603, USA
Posts: 699

The Crimson Crawler - '04 Elantra GLS
90 day: 36.71 mpg (US)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 47 Times in 34 Posts
You IDLE at LIGHTS???
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 12:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
...the above discussion is one reason GM has the 6T40 automatic transmission used in the Cruze automatically shift into "Neutral" when stopped at stop lights, to reduce engine "loading" and thus improve MPG (slightly).


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Old Tele man For This Useful Post:
Cd (09-15-2011)
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com