Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-14-2009, 03:33 AM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hamburg, New York
Posts: 27

The TACO - '011 Tacoma Base 4x4 single cab short bed
90 day: 21.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000mc View Post
speaking of design... you wouldnt want a windshield like the one in the original post. looks like a 90s chevy full size, now they might be reliable, but sooner or later youre going to want to open that hood.
Actually, the headlights and flat grill means it's a 88 or 89, 90-98 had composite one-piece headlights. also looks like 94-01 dodge dually rear fenders mounted on the front.
And, I'm pretty sure that although that windshield would probably help one's mpg's, it would dangerously decrease visibility where the front meets the sides and the cost of the custom 40-inch wipers would probably offset the fuel savings lol


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 03:37 AM   #12 (permalink)
My Goal: 35 MPG All City
 
RandomFact314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 616

The Neon - '00 Neon
90 day: 25.38 mpg (US)

G/F's Car - Kyan - '01 Rio
90 day: 23.94 mpg (US)

The Accord - '97 Accord LX
90 day: 22.41 mpg (US)

Lizzy (all city) - '88 CRX Si
House of Tudor
90 day: 31.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Like so....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 24bitBlackandwhitelongws.jpg (29.7 KB, 93 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 04:25 AM   #13 (permalink)
Grasshopper
 
alohaspirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 916

Makai - '01 Echo 4D Auto
90 day: 34.45 mpg (US)

Mauka - '00 Echo 4D Auto
90 day: 34.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 28 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
I asked around at the local body shops before doing my mods on my own and nobody wanted to have anything to do with it. They wouldn't even do something small, like removing the roof railing.

Ill take it a step further.

I probably wouldnt pay a shop to do it.

Instead I would ask around to see if anyone
needs a side job and then barter for some/all of it.
__________________
Past Present Future?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 05:11 AM   #14 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,709

Svietlana - '05 307 SW
Diesel
90 day: 59.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 622
Thanked 323 Times in 205 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomFact314 View Post
Like so....
I'd go with the skirts and roof extension. In (random)fact, why not go all out with the roof extension, with a hinge to allow trunk access? Also, an aggressive nose job would score points.



On the other hand, if you're mostly city driving, then weight reduction and reducing RR might be better.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 24bitBlackandwhitelongws2.jpg (12.0 KB, 161 views)
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell

Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread


Last edited by Piwoslaw; 09-14-2009 at 10:29 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 01:21 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
wagonman76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,006

Red Car - '89 Celebrity CL 4 door
Team Chevy
90 day: 36.47 mpg (US)

Winter Wagon - '89 6000 LE Wagon
90 day: 28.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts


Maybe something like this? I have one, the dash is like 3 feet long and not moveable, it is a royal pain to work on. Getting to the back of the engine requires laying on your belly and stuffing your head and arms back there, and I'm small too. If the engine ever goes, it would have to come out from the bottom.

On the truck in the original post, I wonder if the whole thing opens for engine access.
__________________

Winter daily driver, parked most days right now


Summer daily driver
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 01:23 PM   #16 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
Your dash is longer than mine... and I have at least 2 feet from tip to windshield LOL.

There's this giant black panel in there that I thought about putting solar panels on, but the cost is still prohibitive.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 04:14 PM   #17 (permalink)
Slow and easy
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 509

Josie - '87 Pickup
90 day: 30 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
The truck in the top picture is, I'm pretty sure, a screencap from the movie Tango and Cash.

Dumb movie. It did introduce the definition of the word "FUBAR" to everyone, however. So there's that.

Would I do that? Maybe, if I had the money. My truck is pretty upright, and a longer slope would open the hole in the air a bit more gradually. However, I wouldn't bother until I had already done a kammback to take full advantage of the smoother flow coming over and around the front.
__________________

You're not in front of me...
I'm 25,000 miles in front of you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 09:28 PM   #18 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 1,651
Thanks: 539
Thanked 93 Times in 54 Posts
A quote from Hot Rods article entitled " Wind Camp"
Concerning aero 'myths' -
" The biggie: windshield rake: According to Eaker, "Here's a myth I can bust. Once the windshield is past 45 degrees of rake-and many stock cars average like 60 degrees-you will not see an improvement from laying it down at an even steeper angle." We proved this on the Camaro, building a hugely sloped "windshield" out of foam core. It did nothing."

This quote comes from the guy that runs the A2 wind tunnel, and worked on the EV-1 aerodynamics.

( Am I the only one that would love to invite him over to our site ? )

Here is a link to the article : Car Aerodynamics - Hot Rod Magazine

BTW, Note that this is a several page article
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 10:57 PM   #19 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,236

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 868
Thanked 294 Times in 248 Posts
Cd - you have to consider that they were testing a stock car with a naturally high Cd, though, and no airflow improvement at the rear. Obviously, any change to the windshield angle would not alone be the end-all be-all of aero, but would work as an aide to keeping the flow smooth over the top of the car and off the boat tail, if it existed.

What I'm saying is that there might be more of a gain if the car had other aero mods.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"


I'd like to think that people might open their eyes at some point... instead, I find it more and more likely that I'll just close mine.

-- Author kept secret.

Je ne veux pas d'une meilleure vie. Je veux être heureux avec celle que j'ai maintenant.
(I do not want a better life. I want to be happy with the one I have now.)


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 01:36 AM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA
Posts: 117

saturn - '99 sc1
90 day: 35.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
Cd - you have to consider that they were testing a stock car with a naturally high Cd, though, and no airflow improvement at the rear. Obviously, any change to the windshield angle would not alone be the end-all be-all of aero, but would work as an aide to keeping the flow smooth over the top of the car and off the boat tail, if it existed.

What I'm saying is that there might be more of a gain if the car had other aero mods.
didnt they get down to a cd of like .20 or some awesomely low number?

the backside of those camaros looks pretty aero to me, especially thiers that looks like it has some rake to the whole car


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
$2.50 Wheel Skirts gascort Aerodynamics 15 07-05-2008 12:32 PM
Alternative to big motor and big $$$? WaxyChicken Fossil Fuel Free 16 01-29-2008 12:02 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com