Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-23-2011, 07:33 AM   #1 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Increased crankshaft/bearing wear with stop/start systems

Powered by Google Docs

Basically they figure stop/start systems will go through 3x the number of start cycles than regular engines, and a start cycle is a cycle the crank and bearings experience lack of pressurized lubrication.

Of course if new bearing tech doesn't fix it, an oil pressurizing system could be added.

Those of you who extensively P&G might want to consider that 3x wear thing being a possibility for you...


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 12:03 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,145
Thanks: 9
Thanked 98 Times in 78 Posts
Many cars with start stop already use an electric oil pump to reduce the load on the engine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 12:15 PM   #3 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,382

Herbie - '86 Golf Diesel
90 day: 51.89 mpg (US)

Steve - '92 Festiva
Thanks: 955
Thanked 324 Times in 273 Posts
Shame that the warning comes from an advert, eh?

I don't disagree, but at the same time, I've seen plenty of really high mileage cars with no engine rebuilds on them to suspect that this is more like slick 50 and ptfe-additive oil.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 12:37 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
vtec-e's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 506

De Yaris - '04 yaris T2
90 day: 69.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 103
Thanked 28 Times in 19 Posts
I recall an article that mentioned that the crankshaft bearings etc was made of tougher stuff to hold up against the extra start/stopping. It was a while back though so don't ask me where it was!
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 04:50 PM   #5 (permalink)
Northern most ecomodder
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 571

reddxhatch - '95 Civic DX
Team Honda
90 day: 46.04 mpg (US)
Thanks: 18
Thanked 60 Times in 38 Posts
Don't load your engine till oil pressure comes back up. Should solve most of the issue.
__________________
Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 05:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
in tents
 
dennyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 157

The Adventure Wagon - '94 Loyale Wagon 4x4
Subaru
90 day: 33.43 mpg (US)

Electro-Monkey - '011 Karate Monkey BMC V2S Front Hub Motor
90 day: 694.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
I wonder which is greater - connecting rod forces before the oil pressure comes up (very low load, just compression), or the radial load from the starter pinion gear? What I'm getting at is, would hybrid systems with electric motors coaxial with the crankshaft avoid a major component of startup wear, by eliminating the pinion gear load on the crank bearings?

A quick calculation for my car: 92mm bore = 10.3 square inches, at 170psi (last time I checked compression) that's 1750 lbs on the connecting rod. I don't have my starter motor torque & pinion diameter handy...
__________________

Last edited by dennyt; 04-23-2011 at 05:08 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 07:13 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 710

318iS - '95 318iS
Team m8
90 day: 34.36 mpg (US)

Track Slag 535 - '89 535i Sport
Team m8
90 day: 19.12 mpg (US)

328 Shooting Brake - '97 328i Touring SE
Team m8
90 day: 24.32 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 23 Times in 22 Posts
Pulse withe E(on)c would eliminate this:0

Failing that, at £500 for a hunkajunk, I can get through 30 new(to me) cars before hitting the price of a car with start/stop
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2011, 12:55 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
vacationtime247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Muncie, IN
Posts: 238

The S cart - '91 Ford Escort Wagon LX
90 day: 33.66 mpg (US)

Pint-oh! - '78 Ford Pinto Pony

Black Beauty - '89 F-350 Dually Diesel Lariat XLT Crew Cab
90 day: 17.67 mpg (US)

The Toylet - '87 Supra 350 Chevy V8 / 700R4

In-Durrrr-Oh - '09 Enduro TMEC 200cc Enduro
90 day: 60.9 mpg (US)

Tem-poo - '86 Tempo GL 4 Door 2.0 Liter Diesel 5 Speed
90 day: 51.12 mpg (US)

Family Truckster - '92 1992 Diesel Caprice Station Wagon project

Ass Tick - '01 Pontiac Aztek GT 5 Door

DoGo#2 - '99 Durango Dodge Durango SLT
Thanks: 11
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Should be less of an issue with good oil and smart use. I'd venture to bet that they were not nice at all to the test engines. Testing them under a worst case scenario. When I EOC, the engine is already at operating temp. Don't accelerate hard after re-start and be smart. Mostly use it on the Escort and it was a freebie. So if something terrible happens, I'm not really out anything.
VT247
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2011, 09:59 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 93
Thanks: 9
Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
I was always under the impression that the worst wear came from a "dry" start, after the engine had been off long enough to allow the oil toy drain down to the sump and reducing the remaining film too much. If you engine is only off a minute I don't believe that this is the case.

Unfortunately the engine is restarted as you are trying to accelerate with the herd away from a light. With an electric oil pump, you could give it a second or two to build some pressure or you could use an accumulator for instant pressurization, albeit with a more complex system.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2011, 05:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,956

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbrowning View Post
I was always under the impression that the worst wear came from a "dry" start, after the engine had been off long enough to allow the oil toy drain down to the sump and reducing the remaining film too much. If you engine is only off a minute I don't believe that this is the case.
Dry and cold - thick oil that doesn't lube as well.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com