Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > DIY / How-to
Register
Now


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-31-2008, 03:30 PM   #41 (permalink)
Addicted
 
bbjsw10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Findlay,OH
Posts: 537

bbjsw10 - '91 Metro Xfi
90 day: 51.06 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clev View Post
Would the fuel system keep pumping in fuel if the car is moving in gear with the ignition killed?
You shouldn't kill the engine with it in gear. Is what I would think.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
I should do a writeup of my ignition coil kill switch method. It would be interesting to compare the two methods to see if there's any difference in the way the car stops/restarts.
Do it!! People need choices. I did mine like that but didn't like the idea of pumping in fuel that didn't burn. But mine is TBI so it is a little different than some. Takes more time for fuel to reach cylinders than MPFI does.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 03:31 PM   #42 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,033

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
I doubt it, but I've never tried that.
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 03:32 PM   #43 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,033

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbjsw10 View Post
Do it!! People need choices. I did mine like that but didn't like the idea of pumping in fuel that didn't burn. But mine is TBI so it is a little different than some.
Mine's Throttle Body Injection also. I'll add it to the to-do list for when I get back.
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 03:37 PM   #44 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Crestline, CA
Posts: 161

The Clunker - '90 Accord EX
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Uranus - '04 Ion 2
90 day: 36.23 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbjsw10 View Post
You shouldn't kill the engine with it in gear. Is what I would think.
In my case, what I need is to be able to kill the fuel but still use engine braking (17+ mile downhill from my house.) I'll have to try out a fuel pump kill.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 03:40 PM   #45 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,033

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Ah, now I see what you're asking.

Your car already has a feature called Deceleration Fuel Cut Off (DFCO). I'm not exactly sure what your specific RPM threshold is for this state to be active, but it's likely your fuel is already off under those conditions.

Build yourself an MPGuino, and you'll know for sure!
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2008, 04:01 PM   #46 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Crestline, CA
Posts: 161

The Clunker - '90 Accord EX
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Uranus - '04 Ion 2
90 day: 36.23 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Ah, now I see what you're asking.

Your car already has a feature called Deceleration Fuel Cut Off (DFCO). I'm not exactly sure what your specific RPM threshold is for this state to be active, but it's likely your fuel is already off under those conditions.

Build yourself an MPGuino, and you'll know for sure!
Yeah, I'll have to do that. As my speed drops, I eventually start hearing a slight burble from the exhaust, indicating to me that at least a little fuel is getting in. My one key-off test indicated that I could get all the way down with the key off, except for about a 4 second light 5th-gear acceleration after a particularly sharp corner. Having the fuel cut off the whole way seems like the way to guarantee that I don't use a drop of fuel the whole way down.

Seems like an MPGuino should be my second mod (after a vacuum gauge, that is.)
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2008, 09:47 AM   #47 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Funny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 174

Rolling Lemon - '02 Corolla S
90 day: 41.6 mpg (US)
I know I am quite late getting in on this thread, but I'm surprised that no one has suggested the best of both worlds... Cut off BOTH the Injectors AND the Ignition. It would be a less than complicated bit of wiring to have a couple relays work off one momentary switch. Just an observation, as I plan to make the above mod to the Rolling Lemon in the very near future.

Also, a question for all those that are far more informed than myself, If the injectors are shut off and the fuel pump is still running, won't that cause undue stress on the fuel pump? Or is there a return line on most fuel injection systems that prevents this? All comments are appreciated.
__________________
American by right
Ecomodder by choice
Hypermiler by necessity

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2008, 12:14 PM   #48 (permalink)
dcb
Master EcoModder
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 3rd rock
Posts: 1,310

pimp mobile - '81 gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Funny View Post
I know I am quite late getting in on this thread, but I'm surprised that no one has suggested the best of both worlds... Cut off BOTH the Injectors AND the Ignition.
LOL, see post #2

Kill switch how-to


You have to be careful how you kill the ignition, camshaft sensor seems to work well on metros but the low tension coil lead doesn't seem a reliable place.

Oh, and MPGuino users might have to add a 10k pullup (to 12 volts) resistor if they add an injector kill switch, otherwise playing with the kill switch will look like some serious injector duty cycle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2008, 01:03 PM   #49 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Funny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 174

Rolling Lemon - '02 Corolla S
90 day: 41.6 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
LOL, see post #2
My mistake, it has already been stated. However the solution (i.e. Schematic Diagram.) has yet to present itself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
You have to be careful how you kill the ignition, camshaft sensor seems to work well on metros but the low tension coil lead doesn't seem a reliable place.
This is a very important point, my only question about the statement is most vehicles are equipped with a fail-safe just in case the engine stalls while the car is in motion? We are just inducing a stall situation, right? So what's the fuss about?
__________________
American by right
Ecomodder by choice
Hypermiler by necessity

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2008, 03:01 PM   #50 (permalink)
dcb
Master EcoModder
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 3rd rock
Posts: 1,310

pimp mobile - '81 gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)
Update, sorry this didn't sink into my head till now, but on the metro at least (and probably many other cars) YOU ONLY NEED TO INTERRUPT THE CAMSHAFT SENSOR CIRCUIT. I just ran some real world tests to confirm this. This would be a good wiki thing.

Let me explain,

interrupting the camshaft sensor tells the computer that the engine is now doing 0 rpm. The computer responds by sending out an ignition signal appropriate for 0 rpm AND an injector signal appropriate for 0 rpm. In other words, it stops both the ignition and the injector.

I confirmed this by monitoring the mpguino instant injHIus while coasting in gear while pressing the camshaft circuit interrupt kill switch. when I hit the switch, the injHIus would go to 0 even though the engine was still turning over via engine braking. I believe the ignition is also being killed because the car shuts down cleanly but havent confirmed with an actual test (i.e. play with the timing light and the kill switch).

So the actual circuit could just be a normally closed switch put in series with the camshaft sensor.

Other cars might be different, that is where the wiki would be useful.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2008, 03:18 PM   #51 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Crestline, CA
Posts: 161

The Clunker - '90 Accord EX
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Uranus - '04 Ion 2
90 day: 36.23 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
Update, sorry this didn't sink into my head till now, but on the metro at least (and probably many other cars) YOU ONLY NEED TO INTERRUPT THE CAMSHAFT SENSOR CIRCUIT. I just ran some real world tests to confirm this. This would be a good wiki thing.
Oh, excellent idea! Does doing this trigger the Check Engine light?
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2008, 03:24 PM   #52 (permalink)
dcb
Master EcoModder
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 3rd rock
Posts: 1,310

pimp mobile - '81 gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)
Not on a 98 metro. But if it does on other cars then we should add a column to the hypothetical wiki table to indicate that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 07:33 PM   #53 (permalink)
METROANNOSAURUS REX
 
FunkSkunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marble, NC
Posts: 120

The Mach .05 - '98 Metro LSi
90 day: 48.88 mpg (US)
Ok I'm lost is there a write up for 96 & newer EOC cut-off switch? Or will the original work for any year Metro? GREAT THREAD btw!!
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 10:17 PM   #54 (permalink)
Addicted
 
bbjsw10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Findlay,OH
Posts: 537

bbjsw10 - '91 Metro Xfi
90 day: 51.06 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkSkunk View Post
Ok I'm lost is there a write up for 96 & newer EOC cut-off switch? Or will the original work for any year Metro? GREAT THREAD btw!!
Thanks, and I believe you could adapt this to work on 96 newer as well, or any car with enough knowledge. I may switch mine to dcb's way of the camshaft sensor. Especially when my MpGuino stuff is waiting at post office for me.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 10:37 PM   #55 (permalink)
METROANNOSAURUS REX
 
FunkSkunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marble, NC
Posts: 120

The Mach .05 - '98 Metro LSi
90 day: 48.88 mpg (US)
Sounds good! I'll have to look over my factory service manual and see where I need to splice in to make this happen! Thanks again
__________________


Last edited by FunkSkunk; 09-28-2008 at 11:18 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 02:56 PM   #56 (permalink)
93 Metro Streamliner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 20

AeroMetro - '93 Metro
Hi, I have a 1993 Metro that I am modding.

What is the benefit of cutting the injector wires, or the coil power, or the cam sensor, etc, instead of just cutting the ignition wire from the key switch?

Is there any reason I shouldn't simply install an SPST toggle switch in the ignition wire (black with blue stripe) coming from the key?

Also, can anyone tell me the purpose of the big yellow wire with the black stripe? It is currently disconnected with no apparent effects.

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 03:06 PM   #57 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,033

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Depeding on the OBD-II protocol your vehicle uses, cutting the ignition may cause a ScanGauge to shut down and take an unacceptably long time to re-initialize after you turn the power back on again. During that time, it's not recording speed/distance, and over time will skew the SG data and become a pain in the butt.

The ISO protocol in the Metros is one like this.

The other kill switch methods stop the engine witnout interrupting power to the SG, so it continues happily factoring speed/distance into the MPG calcs while instant MPG sits at "9999" (the SG value for 0 fuel use.)
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 03:09 PM   #58 (permalink)
93 Metro Streamliner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 20

AeroMetro - '93 Metro
A 1993 Metro doesn't have OBD-II, does it?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 03:11 PM   #59 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Crestline, CA
Posts: 161

The Clunker - '90 Accord EX
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Uranus - '04 Ion 2
90 day: 36.23 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Depeding on the OBD-II protocol your vehicle uses, cutting the ignition may cause a ScanGauge to shut down and take an unacceptably long time to re-initialize after you turn the power back on again. During that time, it's not recording speed/distance, and over time will skew the SG data and become a pain in the butt.

The ISO protocol in the Metros is one like this.

The other kill switch methods stop the engine witnout interrupting power to the SG, so it continues happily factoring speed/distance into the MPG calcs while instant MPG sits at "9999" (the SG value for 0 fuel use.)
Well, that and I wouldn't want to power cycle the ECU any more often than necessary...
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 04:27 PM   #60 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,033

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Good point, Clev.

---

Nope, it doesn't, hypermiler01.

I didn't know what kind of car you had when you posted your first question. You'll be wanting to build yourself an MPGuino for your instrumentation, and it's not affected by ignition-off.
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kill switch for 88-95 Honda Civic/CRX/DelSol AndrewJ DIY / How-to 18 Today 01:05 PM
Kill switch accomplished homeworkhome53 DIY / How-to 12 11-05-2008 06:22 PM
help W/ Remote Kill Switch Idea 93hatchDX DIY / How-to 21 07-31-2008 04:46 PM
Geo Metro Kill Switch Idea? HotRod EcoModding Central 4 07-28-2008 12:43 PM
Winter mod - heater blower integrated with engine kill switch MetroMPG EcoModding Central 3 12-31-2007 11:31 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
All content copyright EcoModder.com