Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2009, 09:25 AM   #61 (permalink)
Slow and easy
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 509

Josie - '87 Pickup
90 day: 30 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
Looks like a good idea but it is probably beyond the capability of any DIYer.

You'd have to get the airfoil shape, pitch and spacing JUST RIGHT for it to work worth a hoot.

You could guess, I suppose, but what good is a design based on a WAG?
For those of us with block-o-cheese front ends - looking at you, Dave, and myself for that matter - it shouldn't be that big a deal - no need for complex curves.

Where'd I leave that set of castoff venetian blinds...?

And hey - what the heck is a WAG?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________

You're not in front of me...
I'm 25,000 miles in front of you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 07:54 PM   #62 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,607
Thanks: 870
Thanked 636 Times in 372 Posts
combo grille

Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
Hello -

Could this be an example of a "combo grill"? :

Help with my aero mods: 1.8L 05 Auto Toyota Corolla


The shape looks close to the description, but each slat is honeycombed with smaller holes. Maybe the smaller holes "vanish" at higher speeds?!?!?! Probably just more designer poop.

CarloSW2
If Santa would bring ecomodder a big wind tunnel,we'd be able to check this sort of thing out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2009, 11:11 AM   #63 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,639

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 559
Thanked 690 Times in 491 Posts
I bet it could be done with yarn.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2009, 02:24 PM   #64 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,502

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
90 day: 42.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 340
Thanked 418 Times in 286 Posts
Frank -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I bet it could be done with yarn.
Yeah, but the wind tunnel would be so much cooler. When I went to UCLA in 1984, for years I would pass by this big rusty cylindrical tank laying on it's side, maybe half the size of a gas truck tank. One day when my Dad was visiting, he told me that it was the wind tunnel they built for *him* and other students as part of their research in the 1950's/1960's. Those were they daze!

Back on topic, wouldn't a pressure gauge behind the grill get the job done?

EDIT: Wouldn't it be easy to model this grill in a CFD program? You don't have to model the whole car, just the grill, the radiator, and some hood/side parts of the car.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society

Last edited by cfg83; 04-23-2009 at 02:49 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 08:37 PM   #65 (permalink)
Mech & Aero Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Garland, Texas
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I maintain my assertion that there is nothing special about the grille from the PopSci article. Any internal cooling flow passage that presents some net flow resistance will result in an increasingly greater portion of the external flow going outside rather than inside the passage as the vehicle speed increases. Although, the capture streamtube for the cooling passage gets increasingly narrow with vehicle speed, the volume of flow through the cooling passage still increases because the pressure difference between the inlet and outlet increases with vehicle speed. (The above discussion is a slight simplification: it is actually the ratio of external and internal velocities that determines the pressure loss coefficient and the streamtube shape.)
I researched automotive cooling airflows from 1988 to 1990 and co-wrote an SAE paper on my findings. If there actually were some amazing aerodynamic trick with a front grille, Jack Williams, my co-author from Ford, surely would have been aware of it. Jack Williams now teaches short courses for SAE on vehicle cooling aerodynamics. Anyone who wants to learn the state-of-the-art for vehicle cooling performance and drag should go to sae.org and buy a couple of Jack’s latest papers. 2001-01-0996 “Aerodynamic Drag of Engine-Cooling Airflow with External Interference” and 2002-01-0256 “Cooling Inlet Aerodynamic Performance and System Resistance”.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2009, 08:50 PM   #66 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,639

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 559
Thanked 690 Times in 491 Posts
I believe you.

It's just the fact that they are doing this "speed based restriction" in an attempt to regulate flow rather than just sticking an eggcrate grille on there.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2009, 09:40 AM   #67 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Candia, NH
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post

And hey - what the heck is a WAG?
Wild A** Guess.

as opposed to a SWAG
which is a
Scientific Wild A** Guess
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 04:14 PM   #68 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
I suspect a similar effect could be achieved with holes of the proper diameter and spacing. Titrating-up would facilitate testing. Hmmm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2009, 05:41 PM   #69 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,639

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 559
Thanked 690 Times in 491 Posts
You are correct; screens are known to behave like that.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Temperature controlled grille block Piwoslaw Aerodynamics 19 11-09-2008 11:24 PM
Grille Blocking Front or Rear trikkonceptz Aerodynamics 11 08-04-2008 12:45 PM
Grille block: front or back and top or bottom? 07b2300 Aerodynamics 11 07-07-2008 11:19 PM
grille blockers... malibuguy Aerodynamics 24 06-25-2008 02:38 AM
Full Grille Block: Upper Grille DifferentPointofView Aerodynamics 12 02-28-2008 11:14 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com