Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-01-2008, 06:30 PM   #1 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
Larger/Heavier Flywheel?

I'm not sure if this has come up at all, but would a larger flywheel enhance FE?

The rationale is to sustain momentum, especially in city driving. (Kinda thought of this from reading an article on F1 racing, which then turned to recalling the hours of playing Gran Turismo and the "Lighter Flywheel" mod).

RH77

__________________
“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research” ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-01-2008, 08:46 PM   #2 (permalink)
Awesomeness personified
 
AndrewJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 642

Harold - '94 Honda Civic CX
90 day: 54.51 mpg (US)

Margot - '08 Surly Big Dummy
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts
Send a message via AIM to AndrewJ
I don't think it'll help.

A flywheel is just going to help engine momentum, if you're using P&G then you don't really want more engine momentum.

Plus, from a more theoretical standpoint, a flywheel is an energy storage device. So you're storing your gasolines energy in kinetic form.
You're also losing energy through mechanical friction (of the flywheel) and you're losing energy every time you have to spin the heavier flywheel up to speed.

Same thing as lighter wheels really. I know there's some debate about lighter wheels, but I don't think anyone's in a big rush to go put heavier wheels on their car for the sake of FE.

I can appreciate the "whatever's good for racing is bad for FE" idea, but I don't think it applies in this case.
__________________
"I got 350 heads on a 305 engine. I get 10 miles to the gallon. I ain't got no good intentions." - The Drive By Truckers.

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 09:41 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
I would surely works, as its worked in the past. There was the golf ecomatic which used a flywheel to store energy, shut the motor down at stops and help relaunch the car with the flywheel momentum. The car acheived 16% better FE.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 10:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
MechE
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,151

The Miata - '01 Mazda MX-5 Miata
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 18 Posts
1. It won't increase thermal efficiency - so if you're putting energy into a FW, it's not going to make running the engine any more efficient
2. At steady state - there's no difference
3. You can shift earlier without dropping rpm as much
4. You'll be able to go further while engine braking

So for 3 and 4, I don't see that big of benefit... If you're going to coast, EOC or throw it in neutral.... I don't see 3 as a big deal - 99% of the time you'll be in or out of gear, not shifting...

For 4, you can get the same benefit by adding dead weight to your car...

If the FW can be disengaged while not "charging" or "discharging" that energy... That would be beneficial for city driving
__________________
Cars have not created a new problem. They merely made more urgent the necessity to solve existing ones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 11:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
Good info guys -- just brainstorming...
__________________
“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research” ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 11:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
EV test pilot
 
bennelson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oconomowoc, WI, USA
Posts: 4,435

Electric Cycle - '81 Kawasaki KZ440
90 day: 334.6 mpg (US)

S10 - '95 Chevy S10
90 day: 30.48 mpg (US)

Electro-Metro - '96 Ben Nelson's "Electro-Metro"
90 day: 129.81 mpg (US)

The Wife's Car - Plug-in Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
90 day: 78.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 663 Times in 388 Posts
Do a web search about flywheels.

There is some really interesting research using large flywheels as energy storage devices.

Think regenerative breaking where slowing down transfers energy into a big flywheel. It spins very quickly. The energy could then be transfered mechanically back to the wheels again, or could run a generator/motor to drive the car.

Really interesting stuff, wish I could think of a good web page about it.

Now this is not a flywheel as in the thing at the end of your engine. It is a HIGH RPM device made of fancy space age stuff.
__________________


300mpg.org Learn how to BUILD YOUR OWN ELECTRIC CAR CHEAP
My YouTube Videos
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 11:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
MechE
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,151

The Miata - '01 Mazda MX-5 Miata
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RH77 View Post
Good info guys -- just brainstorming...
__________________
Cars have not created a new problem. They merely made more urgent the necessity to solve existing ones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2008, 11:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
MP$
 
diesel_john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 595
Thanks: 5
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Send a message via MSN to diesel_john
Lightbulb

not any help on the engine except for what Frank said.
But, off by itself sitting in a partial vacuum, hooked to only a motor/generator. a high speed flywheel, humming along from regen. don't need as big of engine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 12:53 AM   #9 (permalink)
Awesomeness personified
 
AndrewJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 642

Harold - '94 Honda Civic CX
90 day: 54.51 mpg (US)

Margot - '08 Surly Big Dummy
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts
Send a message via AIM to AndrewJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by bennelson View Post
There is some really interesting research using large flywheels as energy storage devices
Really interesting stuff, wish I could think of a good web page about it.

The main problem seems to be safety. Having a massive flywheel (the only kind that'll store enough energy) is quite a safety concern. That's the main problem with energy storage.

Batteries can short out.
Gasoline can blow up.
Flywheels can run off and trash everything.

Oh well.
__________________
"I got 350 heads on a 305 engine. I get 10 miles to the gallon. I ain't got no good intentions." - The Drive By Truckers.

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 01:00 AM   #10 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bennelson View Post
Do a web search about flywheels.

There is some really interesting research using large flywheels as energy storage devices.

Think regenerative breaking where slowing down transfers energy into a big flywheel. It spins very quickly. The energy could then be transfered mechanically back to the wheels again, or could run a generator/motor to drive the car.

Really interesting stuff, wish I could think of a good web page about it.

Now this is not a flywheel as in the thing at the end of your engine. It is a HIGH RPM device made of fancy space age stuff.
Kind of like the Medium-Duty Hybrid Trucks with hydraulic pressure build-up on slow-down/stop. The hydraulic fluid pressure gets the vehicle moving from a stop, then the hybrid system starts the Diesel engine and takes over. In this case the spinning wheel/disc acts as a "torque storage device"?

Instead of brakes (hey, sometimes ya gotta use them) the device would spin from momentum and store that energy to get started again. I'm sure other devices would take priority for installation.

RH77

__________________
“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research” ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
flywheel. power bus DAN General Efficiency Discussion 4 10-02-2013 12:24 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com