Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-17-2009, 10:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 77

The Odyssey Van - '11 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 29.1 mpg (US)

silver racecar - '13 hyundai accent GS
90 day: 38.8 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
Turbo diesel dilema!

I have a little dilema.....I drive a 2006 Dodge Ram 2500 with the cummins turbo diesel. My most current mod was that I blocked the grill approx 90%. What I have noticed by doing this is that the water temp now runs in the 190-200 degree range which is up approx 10 degrees and the intercooler is much hotter than before. Much hotter as in the outlet of the intercooler is almost too hot to touch after just cruising at 3-4psi vs before when you could barely feel the temp difference between ambient and outlet under the same conditions. My question is the much hotter air going in my motor hurting me more than my grill block off is helping? I am getting better mileage but I have been doing a lot of "N" coasting during my daily driving in the order of around 20% of the trip. Any help and/or tips appreciated.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-18-2009, 09:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
chuckm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Monroe, LA
Posts: 308

Exploder - '02 Ford Explorer xlt

Rolla - '02 Toyota Corolla ce
Team Toyota
90 day: 44.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
You could certainly benefit from an intercooler water spray. High temps at your intercooler are drag on your fuel economy and hP. Try looking through these links to do something about it. I would guess that the aero benefit is less than the thermodynamic hit you are taking.
__________________
"Jesus didn't bring 'Natty Lite' to the party. He brought the good stuff."
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 09:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 77

The Odyssey Van - '11 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 29.1 mpg (US)

silver racecar - '13 hyundai accent GS
90 day: 38.8 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
I just calculated that at 3psi boost the block off is causing about a 5% decrease in power and at 10psi boost it is causing about 15% decrease in power. I'm sure the block off does not cancel these loses! What should I do? Lose the grill block off and focus on driving style?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2009, 09:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Yes, or relocate/enlarge the intercooler.

If the IC is in only inline with part of the radiator/grille, leave that section uncovered. Focus on other parts of the truck for aero gains, if you can't relocate the IC.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 03:36 AM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckm View Post
You could certainly benefit from an intercooler water spray.
Quote:
...or relocate/enlarge the intercooler.

OK... the guy blocked off the air flow over his intercooler and you say, Oh no, don't let air flow over an air-to-air heat exchanger, spray water on it or re-engineer it instead!

Come on!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 10:55 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
JackMcCornack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 179
Thanks: 5
Thanked 39 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckm View Post
High temps at your intercooler are drag on your fuel economy and hP.
The raised air intake temp is certainly going to reduce the max HP available to you, but I'd think it would improve fuel economy because the lower density air reduces pumping losses. If I'm wrong about this I'd sure like to know it, because I went to some trouble to provide a hot air intake for my turbo diesel street car (mine's a Kubota with no intercooler, but the principle should be the same, right?)
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 12:28 PM   #7 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Yes, I was going to say the cooler is more a performance and horsepower thing than anything; there are plenty of successful turbo installs with no intercooler at all.

My guess is there would be some loss of peak power but if you aren't using peak power anyway you won't notice anything different.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 12:42 PM   #8 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Except under load, it may start knocking like crazy, due to the increased temp.

If you're going to go cooler-less, at least watch your IAT and EGT for awhile, to make sure that when you're pushing higher boost numbers that you're not getting too hot.

I suggested moving or getting a larger intercooler because typically, on a diesel, (at least from what I know, admittedly not alot.) you won't get any better economy using cold air vs. warm air.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 01:23 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 12

The Cat - '92 Mercury Cougar LS
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I Would Remove The Grill Block. I'm No Genius When It Comes To Diesels But A Couple Of My Buddys Have Diesels And I Know That Hotter Air Going In Can Raise The Exuast Gas Temperature And If That Gets To Hot It Can Cause Damage To The Motor. The Trucks Are Engineered To Stay Within A Specific Operating Temperature And Unless You Install A Pyrometer To Keep An Eye On The EGT You Really Have No Idea How Hot Its Getting.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2009, 02:19 PM   #10 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Diesel knock?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New here with 2006 Dodge Ram 2500 Turbo Diesel nubbzcummins Introductions 3 09-02-2010 01:35 AM
63mpg in a 1986 Isuzu Trooper Turbo Diesel TheWildHippie Success Stories 18 08-10-2010 11:40 AM
Diesel Power Magazine Fuel Economy Shootout JQmile EcoModding Central 3 03-18-2009 09:23 PM
Wanted (1st gen VW turbo diesel) 3lr For Sale 19 10-28-2008 03:28 AM
As I Had Thought Big Dave General Efficiency Discussion 54 09-02-2008 11:00 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com